Cited by 76Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFossil Insects in Amber

Small theropod teeth from the Upper Jurassic coal mine of Guimarota (Portugal)

Zinke, Jens·1998·Paläontologische Zeitschrift

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02987825

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zinke, J.
Affiliations
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Zinke, Jens
Venue
Paläontologische Zeitschrift
Published
1998-04
Volume
72
Issue
1-2
Pages
179-189
ISSN
  • 0031-0220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-6812
OpenAlex
W1970227241
Cited by
76
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Paläontologische Zeitschrift (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
Keywords
theropod dinosaurs, isolated teeth, Late Jurassic, Archaeopteryx, Dromaeosauridae, Troodontidae, Tyrannosauridae, tooth morphotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review