The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Production of fetal asphyxia by maternal psychological stress
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The effects of deprived material circumstances may thus reduce or increase maternal stress, with the support of neuroendocrine and immune mechanisms that may alter feto-maternal exchanges [108,114], causing limited fetal nutrition and/or oxygenation, and leading to both reduced fetal growth [115,116] and a higher risk of preterm birth [117].”
From A Comprehensive Review on Social Inequalities and Pregnancy Outcome—Identification of Relevant Pathways and Mechanisms (2022) · cites this paper as [116]
In the citing paper
“Both human and animal studies have confirmed that subjects exposed to stressors during pregnancy experience a greater risk of both spontaneous abortion and low birthweight [109,116,184,185].”
From A Comprehensive Review on Social Inequalities and Pregnancy Outcome—Identification of Relevant Pathways and Mechanisms (2022) · cites this paper as [116]
In the citing paper
“Exposure to noise may therefore result in fetal asphyxia [115,116] and elicit both preterm birth and fetal growth restriction [202].”
From A Comprehensive Review on Social Inequalities and Pregnancy Outcome—Identification of Relevant Pathways and Mechanisms (2022) · cites this paper as [116]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Antonov, A. N.: Children bom during the siege of Leningrad in 1942.J. Ted. 30:250–259, 1947.
- Copher, D. E., and Huber, C. P.: Heart rate response of the human fetus to induced maternal hypoxia.Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 98:320–335, 1967. · DOI
- Davids, A., and De Vault, S.: Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and childbirth abnormalities.Psychosom. Med. 24:464–470, 1962. · DOI
- Grimm, E. R.: Psychological Investigation of habitual abortion.Psychsom. Med. 24:369–378, 1962. · DOI
- James, W. H.: The problem of spontaneous abortion. X. The efficacy of psychotherapy.Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 85:38–40, 1963. · DOI
- Mann, E. C.: Habitual abortion: A report, in 2 parts on 160 patients.Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 77:706–718, 1959. · DOI
- Myers, R. E.: The pathology of the rhesus monkey placenta.Acta Endocrin. Suppl. 166:221–257, 1972. · DOI
- Pachauri, S., and Marwak, S. M.: Socio-economic factors in relation to birth weight.Indian Ped. 7:462–468, 1970.
- Shaw, J. A., Wheeler, P., and Morgan, D. N.: Mother-infant relationship and weight gain in the first month of life.J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiat. 9:428–444, 1970. · DOI
- Sontag, L. W.: Effect of fetal activity on the nutritional state of the infant at birth.Am. J. Dis. Child. 60:621–630, 1940.
- Sontag, L. W., Steele, W. C., and Lewis, M.: The fetal and maternal cardiac response to environmental stress.Human Develop. 12:1–9, 1969. · DOI
- Tupper, C., and Weil, R. J.: The problem of spontaneous abortion. IX. The treatment of habitual aborters by pschotherapy.Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 83:421–424, 1962. · DOI
- Valerio, D. A., Miller, R. L., Innes, J. R. M., Courtney, K. D., Palotta, A. J., and Guttmacher, R. M.: Macaca Mulatta: The management of a laboratory breeding colony. New York, Academic Press, 1969, pp. 1–140.
Cited by
Psychosocial factors and pregnancy outcome: A review with emphasis on methodological issues
Paarlberg, K. M., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., Passchier, J., Dekker, G. A., & Van Geijn, H. P. (1995) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(95)00018-6 · Cited by 356
Simoncic, V., Deguen, S., Enaux, C., Vandentorren, S., & Kihal-Talantikite, W. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192416592 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Myers, R. E.
- Venue
- The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-62
- ISSN
- 0093-2213
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
