Cited by 357Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Psychosocial factors and pregnancy outcome: A review with emphasis on methodological issues

Paarlberg, K.Marieke, Vingerhoets, AD J.J.M., Passchier, Jan, Dekker, Gustaaf A., Van Geijn, Herman P.·1995·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

This review focuses on the research concerning the relation between psychosocial factors and pregnancy outcome. The following four outcome measures are dealt with: (1) birth weight, (2) preeclampsia, (3) preterm labour, and (4) intrapartum complications. The most consistent finding concerns the association between maternal exposure to taxing situations and preterm delivery. Three possible pathways are hypothesized: (1) an indirect influence via unhealthy coping and life style behaviour, (2) a direct influence via stress-dependent hormones, and (3) an additional direct influence via psycho-immunological factors. Intervention studies aimed at improving pregnancy outcome show fairly mixed results. It is recommended that studies on the relationship between psychosocial factors and pregnancy outcome should employ a prospective design with due attention to chronic stressors, should include appropriate biochemical assessments, and multivariate techniques are applied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3999(95)00018-6

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paarlberg, K. M., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., Passchier, J., Dekker, G. A., & Van Geijn, H. P.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-07
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
563-595
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966171569
Cited by
356
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
psychosocial factors, pregnancy outcomes, birth weight, preeclampsia, preterm labour, labor complications, maternal stress, coping behaviour, stress hormones, psychoneuroimmunology, lifestyle habits, prenatal intervention, research methodology
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Obstetric Labor Complications, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review