Cited by 13Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAnesthesia and Pain Management

Haemodynamic and plasma vasopressin responses during high-dose fentanyl or sufentanil anaesthesia

Open access
Boulton, A. J., Wilson, N., Turnbull, K. W., Yip, R. W.·1986·Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal

Abstract

This study compared the haemodynamic and arginine vasopressin responses of patients to fentanyl or sufentanil anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery. Fourteen normotensive patients with normal left ventricular function were studied. Patients were induced with fentanyl (N = 7) 37.5 micrograms X kg-1 or sufentanil (N = 7) 7.5 micrograms X kg-1 by intravenous infusion over three minutes. Clinically important chest wall rigidity, bradycardia and recall of intraoperative events did not occur. All of the fentanyl patients became hypertensive after induction and five required vasodilator therapy since they did not respond to boluses of fentanyl (12.5 micrograms X kg-1). Two of these five patients had S-T depression greater than 1 mm. Five patients in the sufentanil group became hypertensive after induction. Four of these patients responded to additional sufentanil (3.75 micrograms X kg-1) while one required vasodilator therapy for concomitant S-T depression. Sufentanil attenuated the increase of arginine vasopressin during cardiopulmonary bypass. Levels of arginine vasopressin in the fentanyl group were significantly higher than those of the sufentanil group during bypass. Levels of AVP after bypass were higher in the sufentanil group. The incidence of hypertension was similar in both groups. The hypertension was more easily treated with sufentanil but concomitant vasodilators (nitroglycerine) were required in both patient groups. Neither fentanyl in doses up to 128 +/- 8.7 micrograms X kg-1 nor sufentanil in doses up to 23 +/- 1.4 micrograms X kg-1 can be used as sole agents for anaesthesia in adult coronary artery bypass patients with good ventricular function when induction times are three minutes and bolus top-up doses are used.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03010974

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fentanyl increased AVP release in both surgical patients and healthy volunteers.

    “Fentanyl increased AVP release in both surgical patients (166) and healthy volunteers (167).”

    From Exogenous Opioids and the Human Endocrine System: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement (2024) · cites this paper as [166]

    The Results report increased plasma AVP in fentanyl-treated surgical patients during cardiopulmonary bypass. The Discussion says AVP remained normal before bypass and describes the rise as occurring during bypass, not as an effect caused by fentanyl itself. The healthy-volunteer claim is attached to citation (167), not this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [15]15. Stanley TH, Berman L, Green O, Robertson D. Plasma eatecholamines and eortisol responses to fentanyl anesthesia for coronary artery operations. Anesthesiology 1980; 53: 250-3.
  2. [21]21. De Castro J, Van de Water A, Wouters L, Xhonneux R, Renaman R, Kay B. Comparative study of cardiovascular, neurological and metabolic side- effects of eight narcotics in dogs. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1979; 30: 5-99.
  3. [23]23. Griesemer RW, Moldenhauer CC, Hug Jr CC et al. Sufcntanil anesthesia for aorto-coronary bypass surgery 30 la,g/kg vs 15 Ixg/kg. Anesthesiology 1982; 57: A48.
  4. [25]25. Rosow CE, Philbin DM. Moss J. Keegan CR, Schneider RC. Sufentanil vs fentanyl. Suppression of hemodynamic responses. Anesthesiology 1983; 59: A323.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boulton, A. J., Wilson, N., Turnbull, K. W., & Yip, R. W.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal
Published
1986-07
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
475-483
ISSN
  • 0832-610X (ISSN-L)
  • 0008-2856
  • 1496-8975
OpenAlex
W1970582420
Cited by
13
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
fentanyl, sufentanil, vasopressin, hemodynamic response, anesthesia induction, coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiopulmonary bypass, hypertension, ST-segment depression, nitroglycerin, opioid analgesia, vasodilator therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coronary Artery Bypass, Arginine Vasopressin, Blood Proteins, Fentanyl, Hematocrit, Hemodynamics, Humans, Middle Aged, Osmolar Concentration, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Sufentanil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review