Cited by 46Innovative Teaching MethodsEvaluation of Teaching PracticesOnline and Blended Learning

The influence of learning characteristics on evaluation of audience response technology

MacGeorge, Erina L., Homan, Scott R., Dunning, John B., Elmore, David, Bodie, Graham D., Evans, Ed, Khichadia, Sangeetha, Lichti, Steven M.·2008·Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03033425

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacGeorge, E. L., Homan, S. R., Dunning, J. B., Elmore, D., Bodie, G. D., Evans, E., Khichadia, S., & Lichti, S. M.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
MacGeorge, Erina L.
Venue
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Published
2008-03
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
25-46
ISSN
1042-1726 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058521861
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computing in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
student assessment, learning characteristics, subjective learning, perceived learning, conceptualization of learning, student motivation, course attendance, large lecture classes, instructor evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review