Cited by 388Mobile Learning in EducationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourUsability and User Interface Design

Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use

Nikou, Stavros A., Economides, Anastasios A.·2017·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Macedonia (GR)
Corresponding author
Nikou, Stavros A.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
109
Pages
56-73
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590508971
Cited by
388
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7
FWCI
48.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
mobile-based assessment, behavioral intention, technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, facilitating conditions, social influence, personal innovativeness, mobile self-efficacy, perceived trust, high school students, mobile learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review