A self-applicable partial evaluator and its use in incremental compilation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The problem of left-propagation of bindings has been overlooked in some contributions.
“as well as overlooked in some contributions (e.g. [27])”
From Creating specialised integrity checks through partial evaluation of meta-interpreters (1998) · cites this paper as [27]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Creating specialised integrity checks through partial evaluation of meta-interpreters
Leuschel, M., & De Schreye, D. (1998) · The Journal of Logic Programming · doi:10.1016/s0743-1066(97)10012-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Efficiently generating efficient generating extensions in prolog
Jørgensen, J., & Leuschel, M. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-61580-6_12 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fujita, H., & Furukawa, K.
- Venue
- New Generation Computing
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 91-118
- ISSN
- 0288-3635 (ISSN-L)
- 1882-7055
- OpenAlex
- W1997254051
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- New Generation Computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Embedded Systems Design Techniques
- Keywords
- partial evaluation, Prolog, meta-interpreter, compiler generation, incremental compilation, expert systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
