Cited by 26Logic, programming, and type systemsLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAdvanced Database Systems and Queries

Efficiently generating efficient generating extensions in prolog

Jørgensen, Jesper, Leuschel, Michael·1996·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-61580-6_12

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jørgensen, J., & Leuschel, M.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
1996
Pages
238-262
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1929307865
Cited by
26
References
45
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
3.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
Keywords
partial deduction, partial evaluation, logic programming, Prolog, program specialization, compiler generators, self-application

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review