Cited by 67Logic, programming, and type systemsLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeFormal Methods in Verification

A general criterion for avoiding infinite unfolding during partial deduction

Open access
Bruynooghe, Maurice, De Schreye, Danny, Martens, Bern·1992·New Generation Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03037527

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plugging in a depth-bound-free local control strategy yields a fully automatic, concrete partial-deduction method that always terminates and produces precise and reasonable polyvariance, without resorting to ad hoc techniques.

    “Plugging in a depth-bound-free local control strategy (see Bruynooghe et al. [1992] and Martens and De Schreye [1996]), we thus obtain a fully automatic, concrete partial-deduction method that always terminates and produces precise and reasonable polyvariance, without resorting to any ad hoc techniques.”

    From Controlling generalization and polyvariance in partial deduction of normal logic programs (1998) · cites this paper as Bruynooghe et al. [1992]

  • Partial evaluation of ITE-Prolog can be situated somewhere between partial deduction of pure logic programs and partial evaluation of full Prolog.

    “In summary, partial evaluation of ITE-Prolog, can be situated somewhere between partial deduction of pure logic programs (see [60,31,10,69,68] and systems like sP [30,29], sAGE [34,33] or more recently ECCE [50,51,57]) and partial evaluation of full Prolog (e.g. MIXTUs [83,82] or PADDY [76–78]).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruynooghe, M., De Schreye, D., & Martens, B.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
New Generation Computing
Published
1992-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
47-79
ISSN
  • 0288-3635 (ISSN-L)
  • 1882-7055
OpenAlex
W1991589943
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Generation Computing (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
Keywords
partial deduction, well-founded orderings, program termination, termination proving, logic programming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review