Normative data for the Dutch version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A cutoff of 59 was chosen because community and clinical norms indicate that 58 or 59 best separates normal from pathological worry.
“We used a cutoff of 59 as recently published community and clinical norms indicate that a score of 58 or 59 is the boundary that best differentiates normal and pathological worry (van der Heiden, Muris, Bos, Molen, & Oostra, 2009).”
From Group metacognitive therapy for repetitive negative thinking in primary and non-primary generalized anxiety disorder: An effectiveness trial (2015) · cites this paper as van der Heiden, Muris, Bos, Molen, & Oostra, 2009
Cites
Cognitive Behavioural Processes across Psychological Disorders (DRAFT)
Harvey, A., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004) · doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780198528883.001.0001 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Behar, E., Alcaine, O., Zuellig, A. R., & Borkovec, T. D. (2003) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(03)00004-1 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Gillis, M. M., Haaga, D. A. F., & Ford, G. T. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.450 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Mennin, D. S., & Turk, C. L. (2002) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00113-3 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
Startup, H. M., & Erickson, T. M. (2006) · Worry and its Psychological Disorders · doi:10.1002/9780470713143.ch7 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Topper, M., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Watkins, E., & Ehring, T. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.015 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Topper, M., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Watkins, E., & Ehring, T. (2014) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12052 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
McEvoy, P. M., Erceg-Hurn, D. M., Anderson, R. A., Campbell, B. N. C., Swan, A., Saulsman, L. M., Summers, M., & Nathan, P. R. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.046 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Berk, L., Warmenhoven, F., Stiekema, A. P. M., van Oorsouw, K., van Os, J., de Vugt, M., & van Boxtel, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00092 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“The 16-item Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) was used to measured worry (Meyer et al., 1990; van der Heiden et al., 2009).”
MethodBolinski, F., Kleiboer, A., Karyotaki, E., Bosmans, J. E., Zarski, A.-C., Weisel, K. K., Ebert, D. D., Jacobi, C., Cuijpers, P., & Riper, H. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2477-y · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Endhoven, B., De Cort, K., Matthijssen, S. J. M. A., de Jongh, A., van Minnen, A., Duits, P., Schruers, K. R. J., van Dis, E. A. M., Krypotos, A. M., Gerritsen, L., et al. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04320-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“ASI Anxiety Sensitivity Index ATPTM Attitudes Toward Psychotherapy Treatment Manuals BSQ Bodily Sensation Questionnaire CBT Cognitive behavioral therapy CEQ Dutch credibility and expectancy scale CS Credibility Scale CSQ-8 Client Satisfaction Questionnaire EBPAS Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale EMDR Eye movement…”
MethodNo Evidence for Decreased Generalization of Fear Extinction in High-Trait Anxious Individuals
Endhoven, B., Krypotos, A. M., Mertens, G., & Engelhard, I. M. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.1177/20438087241272700 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Questionnaire (PSWQ; Meyer et al., 1990; van der Heiden et al., 2009), using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all , 5 = totally ).”
Method
- Authors
- van der Heiden, C., Muris, P., Bos, A. E. R., van der Molen, H., & Oostra, M.
- Affiliations
- PsyQ (NL)
- Venue
- Netherlands Journal of Psychology
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 69-75
- ISSN
- 1872-552X (ISSN-L)
- 1876-8768
- OpenAlex
- W2096208153
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.eur.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Netherlands journal of psychology (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Keywords
- Penn State Worry Questionnaire, worry, generalized anxiety disorder, reference values, Dutch version, short-form questionnaire, community sample, percentile scores, treatment evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
