Cited by 9Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAsthma and respiratory diseasesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Modeling the Impact of Genetic Screening Technologies on Healthcare: Theoretical Model for Asthma in Children

de Mesa, Emma Gutiérrez, Hidalgo, Ignacio, Christidis, Panayotis, Ciscar, Juan Carlos, Vegas, Eva, Ibarreta, Dolores·2007·Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy

Abstract

Background and objective This study focuses on the potential impact of genetic screening technologies on healthcare. Genetic screening for asthma in children was chosen as a case study to explore the cost effectiveness of applying early genetic screening to infants, and preventive treatment to the population at risk. Early intervention could prevent progression and facilitate clinical management of the disease. From the elite group of genetic markers that have been associated with asthma-related phenotypes, ADAM33 was the first published candidate gene detected by a positional cloning approach, marking the entry of asthma research into the genomic era. The model was, therefore, initially set for an ex ante analysis of the cost effectiveness of applying the preventive program to an infant population at risk, i.e. infants presenting wheezing episodes during the first year of life, and the ADAM33 ST+7 genetic marker, with the idea of expanding to further markers and their combinations lat a later date. Methods In accordance with the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, four categories of asthma were considered. A Markov model was constructed, consisting of six mutually exclusive disease states (including healthy and dead states) with a simulation horizon of 100 years and a cycle length of 1 year. We define a scenario where early genetic screening was applied to infants presenting wheezing episodes during the first year of life and a preventive treatment to those childre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03256252

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STMs used to evaluate screening strategies consider two types: one-time screening or repeated interval screening.

    “STMs used to evaluate screening strategies [16,17] consider two types: one-time screening, (e.g., of newborns [18] or genetic screening [19 -21]) or repeated (interval) screening (e.g., for cancer [22][23][24][25] or HIV [26,27]).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Mesa, E. G., Hidalgo, I., Christidis, P., Ciscar, J. C., Vegas, E., & Ibarreta, D.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Madrid Health Service (ES)
Venue
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy
Published
2007-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
313-323
ISSN
  • 1177-1062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2000
OpenAlex
W85752360
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
genetic screening, asthma, ADAM33, early intervention, cost-effectiveness, Markov model, wheezing infants, prophylaxis, quality-adjusted life years, cost of genetic testing, discount rate, transition probabilities, childhood asthma, genetic markers, third-party payer perspective, patient perspectives, sensitivity analysis, transition matrix
MeSH terms
Asthma, Child, Genetic Testing, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, ADAM Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review