CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Race and the disciplines of the plantation

Epperson, Terrence W.·1990·Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/bf03373494
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03373494

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nearly every aspect of plantation space resulted from conscious decision making on the part of planters to maximize profits, exercise surveillance and reinforce the subordinate status of enslaved people.

    “Nearly every aspect of plantation space from the location and arrangement of slave quarters (e.g.Armstrong 1990a; Epperson 1990Epperson , 1999Epperson , 2000) ) to the details of slave-house construction (e.g.McKee 1992) resulted from conscious decision making on the part of planters to maximize pro ts, exercise surveillance and reinforce the subordinate status of enslaved people.”

    From Slavery and spatial dialectics on Cuban coffee plantations (2001) · cites this paper as Epperson 1990

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Epperson, T. W.
Venue
Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1990-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
29-36
ISSN
  • 0440-9213
  • 2328-1103
DOI
10.1007/bf03373494
Cited by
62
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review