Cited by 29Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesPhilosophy, History, and HistoriographyPolitical Economy and Marxism

The political economy of archaeological cultures: Marxism and American historical archaeology

Matthews, Christopher N., Leone, Mark P., Jordan, Kurt A.·2002·Journal of Social Archaeology

Abstract

The application of Marxist theory in American historical archaeology has expanded greatly over the past 20 years. More than just a theoretical tool, the rise of Marxism reflects an emerging consciousness within historical archaeology that its subject matter is capitalism, an interest obviously shared with Marx himself. We propose, however, that historical archaeology has proceeded to study the emergence of the modern culture of capitalism without engaging Marx’s critique of the political economy of cultural production in any direct way. Instead, much of historical archaeology reifies past cultural formations in place of maintaining a focus on the dialectical social processes through which those formations emerged. We illustrate how a Marxist approach to cultural production improves the foundational historical archaeologies of the colonial American state and African-American ethnogenesis and is the basis for archaeologically-based critiques of dominant American society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469605302002001599

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Corrigan, P., 1985, The Great Arch
  2. Glassie, H., 1975, Folk Housing in Middle Virginia
  3. Harmon, J., 2000, Archaeological Investigations at the James Brice House (18AP38): A National Historic Landmark Site. Annapolis, Maryland
  4. Hodder, I., 1983, Symbols in Action
  5. Jordan, D.W. (1966) ‘The Royal Period of Colonial Maryland, 1689-1715’, PhD dissertation, Department of History, Princeton University, NJ.
  6. Leone, M.P., Spirit Management Among Americans of African Descent
  7. Logan, G.C., 1992, 1991 Archaeological Excavations at the Charles Carroll House in Annapolis, Maryland, 18AP45
  8. Paynter, R., 1991, The Archaeology of Inequality, 1
  9. Yentsch, A.E., 1991, The Archaeology of Inequality, 192
  10. Yentsch, A.E., 1992, The Art and Mystery of Historical Archaeology: Essays in Honor of James Deetz, 253

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Matthews, C. N., Leone, M. P., & Jordan, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Hofstra University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Published
2002-02
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
109-134
ISSN
  • 1469-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2951
OpenAlex
W2016820378
Cited by
29
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
Marxist theory, historical archaeology, capitalism, reification, critique of American society, archaeological culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review