Cited by 5Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesSoil and Environmental Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 42 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Urbanization and Landscape Change in Early-Eighteenth-Century Boston: The Environmental Archaeology of Town Dock

Landon, David, Trigg, Heather, Bain, Allison, Morin, Edward·2016·Historical Archaeology

Abstract

The creation of the urban built landscape is perhaps one of the most dramatic examples of anthropogenic environmental change. This paper explores the creation of the urban landscape in downtown Boston during the early 18th century. Archaeological excavations next to Faneuil Hall, Boston's iconic market building, recovered evidence for land-making processes and the filling of Town Dock. The macrobotanicals, pollen, faunal remains, and insects in the landfill reveal, at very different scales, the changing nature of the urban environment from the area immediately around the site to the broader region. A study of these data in the context of the filling of Town Dock thus provides a detailed view of human actions in the creation and structuring of the urban landscape.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Archaeological excavation next to Faneuil Hall documents the filling of Boston’s Town Dock and the creation of an anthropogenic urban landscape in the early 18th century. Environmental remains—insects, faunal bones, macrobotanicals, and pollen—show the site changing from a wet dock/marsh setting into filled land tied to regional agriculture, Atlantic trade, and urban waste disposal.

Key findings

  • Excavations exposed waterlogged timber grillage in at least four layers; dendrochronology on nine hemlock samples dated the oldest timber after 1628, with eight samples clustering 1681–1709, suggesting filling work may have begun earlier than the formal 1728 town decision.
  • Insect analysis identified 197 individual beetles from at least 45 taxa, including wharf borer (*Nacerdes melanura*), granary weevil (*Sitophilus granarius*), bean weevils, dung beetles, and other pests/decayers, indicating waterlogged wood, stored-food pests, and fecal/rotting organic material.
  • Faunal remains totaled 4,158 specimens from at least 29 taxa; mammals made up almost 70% of specimens and over 97% of biomass, with no wild mammals present, while birds included barnyard species and wild hunted birds, especially pigeon.
  • Macrobotanical flotation recovered over 1,700 specimens from 59 taxa; economically important plants made up over 70% of identified plants, almost half of those were wild or semi-wild, and pollen analysis identified 97 taxa plus roundworm and whipworm eggs, supporting night-soil deposition.

Methods

  • Excavation outside and adjacent to the north wall of Faneuil Hall, beneath modern layers, uncovered 18th-century fill strata and deeply buried waterlogged timbers; sterile subsoil was not reached.
  • Systematic environmental sampling included flotation for insects and macrobotanicals, faunal analysis, pollen extraction/identification, and dendrochronology of wooden timbers.
  • The article synthesizes these datasets in relation to the filling of Town Dock, the construction/rebuilding/expansion of Faneuil Hall, and broader urban landscape change.

Limitations

  • The paper states that only a small section was exposed, so the complete landmaking process is not entirely clear and whether bulkheads or other enclosing structures were used is unknown; it also notes that the dendrochronology dates are interpreted as correct and that pollen change through time is not entirely consistent.
  • Evident from the text: the environmental methods and results are detailed elsewhere, and this article describes them in more general terms; no sterile subsoil was encountered, and later disturbances mixed some earlier fill layers.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03377178

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 42 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 68 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 69
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
83 of 83
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The dendrochronology dates for the timbers are correct.

    “1f the dendrochronology dates are correct”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Butchery waste, rotten food, and a variety of equally noxious materials were dumped in the Town Dock fill.

    “In addition to human and animal wastes, we must assume that butchery waste, rotten food, and a variety of equally noxious materials were dumped in the Town Dock fill.”
2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Beaudry, Mary 1984 Excavations at the Wilkinson Backlot Site, Boston, Massachusetts: A Preliminary Report. Boston University, Center for Archaeological Studies, Occasional Paper, No. 1. Boston, MA.
  2. Behre, Karl-Ernst 1981 The Interpretation of Anthropogenic Indicators in Pollen Diagrams. Pollen et Spores 23(2):225–245.
  3. Benes, Peter 1995 Horticultural Importers and Nurseryman in Boston, 1719–1770. In Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife: Plants and People, ePeter Benes, editor, pp. 38–53. Boston University Press, Boston, MA.
  4. Campbell, John M., D. B. Lyons, and Michael J. Sarazin 1990 Canadian Beetles (Coloptera) Injurious to Crops, Ornamentals, Stored Products, Household Products, and Buildings. Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Ottawa, ON.
  5. Cassedy, Daniel, Kimberly Morrell, Thomas Kutys, Matt Jorgenson, and Edward Morin 2013 Archeological Investigations in Support of the Transportation and Information Hub Project, Faneuil Hall, Boston, Massachusetts: Archeological Data Recovery Report. Report to National Park Service, Denver Service Center, Denver, CO, from URS Corporation, Burlington, NJ.
  6. Dussault, Frédéric, and Allison Bain 2011 Assessment of Archaeoentomological Remains from Faneuil Hall, Boston. Manuscript, Laboratoire d’archéologie environnementale, Université Laval, Quebec, QC.
  7. Flynt, William A. 2011 A Dendrochronology Study of Archeological Timbers from the Town Dock Extracted from an Excavation Adjacent to Faneuil Hall, Boston, Massachusetts. Manuscript, Historic Deerfield, Deerfield, MA.
  8. Friedmann, Karen J. 1973 Victualling Colonial Boston. Agricultural History 47(3):189–205.
  9. Jacobucci, Susan 2007 A Pollen Analysis of Selected Contexts Associated with the African Meeting House. In Investigating the Heart of a Community: Archaeological Investigations at the African Meeting House, Boston, Massachusetts, David B. Landon, editor, pp. 129–146. University of Massachusetts Boston, Andrew Fiske Memorial Center for Archaeological Research Culture Resource Management Study, No. 22. Boston.
  10. Jacobucci, Susan, and Heather B. Trigg 2011 An Analysis of Pollen from Boston’s Faneuil Hall. Manuscript, Andrew Fiske Memorial Center for Archaeological Research, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston.
  11. Kelso, Gerald K., and Johanna Shoss 1983 Exploratory Pollen Analysis of the Bostonian Hotel Site Sediments. In Archeology of the Bostonian Hotel Site, James W. Bradley, editor, pp. 67–76. Massachusetts Historical Commission, Occasional Publications in Archaeology and History, No. 2. Boston.
  12. Landon, David B. 1996 Feeding Colonial Boston: A Zooarchaeological Study. Thematic issue, Historical Archaeology 30(1).
  13. Louis Berger & Associates, Inc. 1999 Archaeological Investigations at the Former Town Dock and Faneuil Hall, Boston National Historical Park, Boston, Massachusetts. Report to Applied Archaeology Center, National Park Service, Denver, CO, from Cultural Resource Group, Louis Berger & Associates, Inc., East Orange, NJ.
  14. Seasholes, Nancy S. 1983 Documentary History of the Bostonian Hotel Site. In Archeology of the Bostonian Hotel Site, James W. Bradley, editor, pp. 51–59. Massachusetts Historical Commission, Occasional Publications in Archaeology and History, No. 2. Boston.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Landon, D., Trigg, H., Bain, A., & Morin, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Historical Archaeology
Published
2016-03
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
80-93
ISSN
  • 0440-9213 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-1103
OpenAlex
W2514319774
Cited by
5
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
urbanization, landscape change, Faneuil Hall, landfill, anthropogenic environmental change, pollen analysis, faunal remains, insects, urban built environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review