CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Investigation of Sex Differences in Word Ratings Across Concrete, Abstract, and Emotion Words

Bauer, Lisa M., Altarriba, Jeanette·2008·The Psychological Record
DOI 10.1007/bf03395629
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03395629

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. ALTARRIBA, J., & BAUR, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389–410. · DOI
  2. FRIENDLY, M., FRANKLIN, P. E., HOFFMAN, D. M., & RUBIN, D. C. (1982). The Toronto word pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1080 words. Behavior Research Methods and instrumentation, 14, 375–399. · DOI
  3. GILHOOLY, K. J., & LOGIE, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & instrumentation, 12, 395–427. · DOI
  4. GOLEMAN, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
  5. GRAVES, R., LANDIS, T., & GOODGLASS, H. (1981). Laterality and sex differences for visual recognition of emotional and non-emotional words. Neuropsychologia, 19, 95–102. · DOI
  6. HARSHMAN, R. A., HAMPSON, E., & BERENB, S.A. (1983). Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization, part 1: Sex and handedness differences in ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 144–192. · DOI
  7. HARSHMAN, R. A., & PAIVIO, A. (1987). “Paradoxical” sex differences in self-reported imagery. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 287–302. · DOI
  8. HERZ, R.S., ELIASSEN, J., BELAND, S., & SOUZA, T. (2004) Neuroimaging evidence for the emotional potency of odor-evoked memory. Neuropsychologia, 42, 371–378 · DOI · Paper page
  9. HUNT, R. R., & ELLIS, H. C. (2004). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology (7th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
  10. KIMURA, D., & CLARKE, P. G. (2002). Women’s advantage on verbal memory is not restricted to concrete words. Psychological Reports, 91, 1137–1142. · DOI
  11. KIMURA, D., & SEAL, B. N. (2003). Sex differences in recall of real or nonsense words. Psychological Reports, 93, 263–264. · DOI
  12. NELSON, D. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 237–260. · DOI
  13. PAIVIO, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  14. PAIVIO, A., YUILLE, J. C., & MADIGAN, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25. · DOI
  15. RUBIN, D. C., & FRIENDLY, M. (1986). Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronounceability for 925 nouns. Memory & Cognition,, 79–94. · DOI
  16. SCHWANENFLUGEL, P. J., AKIN, C., & LUH, W. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 96–104. · DOI
  17. SEIDLITZ, L., & DIENER, E. (1998). Sex differences in the recall of affective experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 262–271. · DOI
  18. YUILLE, J. C. (1968). Concreteness without imagery in Pa learning. Psychonomic Science, 11, 55–56. · DOI
  19. WHISSELL, C. M. (1989). The dictionary of affect in language. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience, Vol. 4 (pp. 113–131). New York: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bauer, L. M., & Altarriba, J.
Venue
The Psychological Record
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-07
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
465-474
ISSN
  • 0033-2933
  • 2163-3452
DOI
10.1007/bf03395629
Cited by
24
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review