The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public-key cryptosystems from lattice reduction problems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462
A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms
Elgamal, T. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1985.1057074 · Cited by 8,059
Cited by
NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J., & Silverman, J. H. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054868 · Cited by 1,947
A Survey on Homomorphic Encryption Schemes: Theory and Implementation
Acar, A., Aksu, H., Uluagac, A. S., & Conti, M. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3214303 · Cited by 1,397
Bernstein, D. J., & Lange, T. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23461 · Cited by 1,242
On-the-fly multiparty computation on the cloud via multikey fully homomorphic encryption
López-Alt, A., Tromer, E., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2012) · Proceedings of the forty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/2213977.2214086 · Cited by 910
Implementing Gentry’s Fully-Homomorphic Encryption Scheme
Gentry, C., & Halevi, S. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_9 · Cited by 889
Self-citationLattice Signatures without Trapdoors
Lyubashevsky, V. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_43 · Cited by 827
Micciancio, D., & Regev, O. (2009) · Post-Quantum Cryptography · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7_5 · Cited by 615
Regev, O. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11818175_8 · Cited by 485
New Public-Key Cryptosystem Using Braid Groups
Ko, K. H., Lee, S. J., Cheon, J. H., Han, J. W., Kang, J.-S., & Park, C. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44598-6_10 · Cited by 408
The impact of quantum computing on present cryptography
Mavroeidis, V., Vishi, K., D., M., & Jøsang, A. (2018) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090354 · Cited by 361
NTRUSign: Digital Signatures Using the NTRU Lattice
Hoffstein, J., Howgrave-Graham, N., Pipher, J., Silverman, J. H., & Whyte, W. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36563-x_9 · Cited by 302
Bonsai Trees, or How to Delegate a Lattice Basis
Cash, D., Hofheinz, D., Kiltz, E., & Peikert, C. (2012) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/s00145-011-9105-2 · Cited by 297
New lattice-based cryptographic constructions
Regev, O. (2004) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1039488.1039490 · Cited by 292
A Decade of Lattice Cryptography
Peikert, C. (2016) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781680831139 · Cited by 256
An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software
McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. M., & Booth, K. S. (2002) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/503376.503406 · Cited by 169
Quantum resistant public key cryptography: a survey
Perlner, R. A., & Cooper, D. A. (2009) · Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Identity and Trust on the Internet · doi:10.1145/1527017.1527028 · Cited by 137
Post Quantum Cryptography: A Review of Techniques, Challenges and Standardizations
Bavdekar, R., Jayant Chopde, E., Agrawal, A., Bhatia, A., & Tiwari, K. (2023) · 2023 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) · doi:10.1109/icoin56518.2023.10048976 · Cited by 108
Fujiwara, M., Waseda, A., Nojima, R., Moriai, S., Ogata, W., & Sasaki, M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep28988 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldreich, O., Goldwasser, S., & Halevi, S.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 112-131
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1886646278
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
