The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bonsai Trees, or How to Delegate a Lattice Basis
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identity-Based Cryptosystems and Signature Schemes
Shamir, A. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-39568-7_5 · Cited by 6,635
Identity-Based Encryption from the Weil Pairing
Boneh, D., & Franklin, M. (2003) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539701398521 · Cited by 3,528
Public Key Encryption with Keyword Search
Boneh, D., Di Crescenzo, G., Ostrovsky, R., & Persiano, G. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_30 · Cited by 3,134
A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks
Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rivest, R. L. (1988) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0217017 · Cited by 2,804
Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions
Gentry, C., Peikert, C., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2008) · Proceedings of the fortieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1374376.1374407 · Cited by 2,435
Self-citationOn lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography
Regev, O. (2009) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1568318.1568324 · Cited by 2,315
Efficient Identity-Based Encryption Without Random Oracles
Waters, B. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11426639_7 · Cited by 2,014
NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J., & Silverman, J. H. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054868 · Cited by 1,947
On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors over Rings
Lyubashevsky, V., Peikert, C., & Regev, O. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_1 · Cited by 1,831
Self-citationEfficient Selective-ID Secure Identity-Based Encryption Without Random Oracles
Boneh, D., & Boyen, X. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_14 · Cited by 1,766
Cited by
Efficient Fully Homomorphic Encryption from (Standard) LWE
Brakerski, Z., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2011) · 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/focs.2011.12 · Cited by 1,449
Making NTRU as Secure as Worst-Case Problems over Ideal Lattices
Stehlé, D., & Steinfeld, R. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_4 · Cited by 444
A Toolkit for Ring-LWE Cryptography
Lyubashevsky, V., Peikert, C., & Regev, O. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_3 · Cited by 416
Self-citationFrodo: Take off the Ring! Practical, Quantum-Secure Key Exchange from LWE
Bos, J., Costello, C., Ducas, L., Mironov, I., Naehrig, M., Nikolaenko, V., Raghunathan, A., & Stebila, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978425 · Cited by 320
Efficient Identity-Based Encryption over NTRU Lattices
Ducas, L., Lyubashevsky, V., & Prest, T. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45608-8_2 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Cash, D., Hofheinz, D., Kiltz, E., & Peikert, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Cryptology
- Published
- 2011-09-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 601-639
- ISSN
- 0933-2790 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1378
- OpenAlex
- W1983370494
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 19.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bonsai Trees, or How to Delegate a Lattice Basis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00145-011-9105-2
- The paper
- Cash, D., Hofheinz, D., Kiltz, E., & Peikert, C. (2012). Bonsai Trees, or How to Delegate a Lattice Basis. Journal of Cryptology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00145-011-9105-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
