The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wormholes, emergent gauge fields, and the weak gravity conjecture
Open accessAbstract
This paper revisits the question of reconstructing bulk gauge fields as boundary operators in AdS/CFT. In the presence of the wormhole dual to the thermofield double state of two CFTs, the existence of bulk gauge fields is in some tension with the microscopic tensor factorization of the Hilbert space. I explain how this tension can be resolved by splitting the gauge field into charged constituents, and I argue that this leads to a new argument for the “principle of completeness”, which states that the charge lattice of a gauge theory coupled to gravity must be fully populated. I also claim that it leads to a new motivation for (and a clarification of) the “weak gravity conjecture”, which I interpret as a strengthening of this principle. This setup gives a simple example of a situation where describing low-energy bulk physics in CFT language requires knowledge of high-energy bulk physics. This contradicts to some extent the notion of “effective conformal field theory”, but in fact is an expected feature of the resolution of the black hole information problem. An analogous factorization issue exists also for the gravitational field, and I comment on several of its implications for reconstructing black hole interiors and the emergence of spacetime more generally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 · Cited by 4,302
A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/062 · Cited by 1,822 · cited 1×
“This is precisely what appears in the leading-order formula for the entanglement entropy of one of the boundaries [65, 66]; this suggests a possibly deep connection between the RyuTakayanagi/Hubeny-Rangamani-Takayanagi formula and the factorization problem.”
BackgroundA Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0705.0016 · Cited by 1,822
Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT
Almheiri, A., Dong, X., & Harlow, D. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)163 · Cited by 802
Self-citationHolographic representation of local bulk operators
Hamilton, A., Kabat, D., Lifschytz, G., & Lowe, D. A. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.066009 · Cited by 509
Jerusalem lectures on black holes and quantum information
Harlow, D. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015002 · Cited by 480
Self-citationAlmheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., Stanford, D., & Sully, J. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)018 · Cited by 425
Causality & holographic entanglement entropy
Headrick, M., Hubeny, V. E., Lawrence, A., & Rangamani, M. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2014)162 · Cited by 418
State-dependent bulk-boundary maps and black hole complementarity
Papadodimas, K., & Raju, S. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.086010 · Cited by 267
Constructing local bulk observables in interacting AdS/CFT
Kabat, D., Lifschytz, G., & Lowe, D. A. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.106009 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two-dimensional nearly anti-de Sitter space
Maldacena, J., Stanford, D., & Yang, Z. (2016) · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics · doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw124 · Cited by 1,068
The Swampland: Introduction and Review
Palti, E. (2019) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 · Cited by 908
Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality
Dong, X., Harlow, D., & Wall, A. C. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.021601 · Cited by 541
Self-citationLectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications
van Beest, M., Calderón-Infante, J., Mirfendereski, D., & Valenzuela, I. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 · Cited by 336
Marolf, D., & Maxfield, H. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)044 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Harlow, D.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 2016
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1821822517
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wormholes, emergent gauge fields, and the weak gravity conjecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep01(2016)122
- The paper
- Harlow, D. (2016). Wormholes, emergent gauge fields, and the weak gravity conjecture. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep01(2016)122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
