CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,822Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal

Open access
Hubeny, Veronika E., Rangamani, Mukund, Takayanagi, Tadashi·2007·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.0705.0016arXiv 0705.0016
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

With an aim towards understanding the time-dependence of entanglement entropy in generic quantum field theories, we propose a covariant generalization of the holographic entanglement entropy proposal of hep-th/0603001. Apart from providing several examples of possible covariant generalizations, we study a particular construction based on light-sheets, motivated in similar spirit to the covariant entropy bound underlying the holographic principle. In particular, we argue that the entanglement entropy associated with a specified region on the boundary in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence is given by the area of a co-dimension two bulk surface with vanishing expansions of null geodesics. We demonstrate our construction with several examples to illustrate its reduction to the holographic entanglement entropy proposal in static spacetimes. We further show how this proposal may be used to understand the time evolution of entanglement entropy in a time varying QFT state dual to a collapsing black hole background. Finally, we use our proposal to argue that the Euclidean wormhole geometries with multiple boundaries should be regarded as states in a non-interacting but entangled set of QFTs, one associated to each boundary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.0705.0016

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fine-grained entropy is the minimal value of the generalized entropy over surfaces.

    “Roughly the idea is that we choose a surface such that the generalized entropy is minimized. This minimal value is the fine-grained entropy,”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [6]

    Section 3.3, equations (3.6)–(3.7) and (3.15), gives holographic entanglement entropy from a surface selected by minimizing area; when multiple extremal surfaces exist, it chooses the one with the smallest area. The cited paper does not state the claimed minimization of generalized entropy, so the quantity being minimized is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • There is a gravitational formula for the von Neumann or fine-grained entropy that involves a generalized entropy, with an area plus the entropy of fields outside, differing from the coarse-grained formula only in the choice of dividing surface.

    “Surprisingly there is also a gravitational formula for the von Neumann or fine-grained entropy [5,6,9,10]. It is also given by a formula that involves a generalized entropy, with an area plus the entropy of fields outside. The only difference is in the choice of the dividing surface.”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [6]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) 2 [hep-th/0405152]. · arXiv
  2. M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function, cond-mat/0510613. · arXiv
  3. G. 't Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, gr-qc/9310026. · arXiv
  4. D. Bigatti and L. Susskind, TASI lectures on the holographic principle, hep-th/0002044. · arXiv
  5. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]. · arXiv
  6. M. Headrick and T. Takayanagi, A holographic proof of the strong subadditivity of entanglement entropy, arXiv:0704.3719. · arXiv
  7. S.N. Solodukhin, Entanglement entropy of black holes and AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 201601 [hep-th/0606205]. · arXiv
  8. J.-W. Lee, J. Lee and H.-C. Kim, Dark energy from vacuum entanglement, hep-th/0701199. · arXiv
  9. M. Cadoni, Entanglement entropy of two-dimensional Anti-de Sitter black holes, arXiv:0704.0140. · arXiv
  10. S.W. Hawking and G.F.R. Ellis, The large scale structure of space-time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973).
  11. J.M.M. Senovilla, Trapped submanifolds in lorentzian geometry, math.DG/0412256. JHEP07(2007)062 · arXiv
  12. H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers and E. Herlt, Exact solutions of Einstein's field equations, Cambridge Univ. Pr., Cambridge (2003).
  13. V. Balasubramanian et al., Typicality versus thermality: an analytic distinction, hep-th/0701122. · arXiv
  14. J. Hammersley, Numerical metric extraction in AdS/CFT, arXiv:0705.0159. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
ORCID
Hubeny, Veronika E.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2007
Volume
2007
Issue
07
Pages
062-062
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0705.0016
arXiv
0705.0016
OpenAlex
W2157692768
Cited by
1,822
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 183 · 2022: 182 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 179 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 112 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19GS0219)
  • Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
holographic entanglement entropy, covariant entropy bound, light sheet, AdS/CFT correspondence, Euclidean wormholes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review