Cited by 104Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesTheoretical and Computational Physicsadvanced mathematical theories

Functional renormalisation group approach for tensorial group field theory: a rank-3 model

Open access
Benedetti, Dario, Geloun, Joseph Ben, Oriti, Daniele·2015·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

We set up the Functional Renormalisation Group formalism for Tensorial Group Field Theory in full generality. We then apply it to a rank-3 model over U(1)3, endowed with a kinetic term linear in the momenta and with nonlocal interactions. The system of FRG equations turns out to be non-autonomous in the RG flow parameter. This feature is explained by the existence of a hidden scale, the radius of the group manifold. We investigate in detail the opposite regimes of large cut-off (UV) and small cut-off (IR) of the FRG equations, where the system becomes autonomous, and we find, in both case, Gaussian and non-Gaussian fixed points. We derive and interpret the critical exponents and flow diagrams associated with these fixed points, and discuss how the UV and IR regimes are matched. Finally, we discuss the evidence for a phase transition from a symmetric phase to a broken or condensed phase, from an RG perspective, finding that this seems to exist only in the approximate regime of very large radius of the group manifold, as to be expected for systems on compact manifolds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep03(2015)084

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number operator N exists only in the zero-interaction representation, when all representations of the CCRs are equivalent to the Fock representation.

    “Strictly speaking, N exists only in the zero-interaction representation which is when all representations of the CCRs are equivalent to the Fock representation, as is well known within the context local QFTs [34].”
  • The proper treatment of interactions necessitates the use of non-Fock representations for which N is infinite.

    “Such behavior is not surprising, as it is well known within the context of local QFTs that the proper treatment of interactions necessitates the use of non-Fock representations for which N is infinite (cf. appendix B and [34]).”
  • It is only in the thermodynamic limit that inequivalent irreducible representations of the CCRs become available which is a prerequisite for the occurrence of nonunique equilibrium states, in turn essential to consistently describing phase transitions.

    “It is only in this limit that inequivalent irreducible representations of the CCRs become available which is a prerequisite for the occurrence of nonunique equilibrium states, in turn essential to consistently describing phase transitions [34].”
  • For interacting fields, models with nonvanishing ground state expectation value and many body systems in the thermodynamic limit, the Fock representation is not allowed and N is not a good quantum number.

    “However, this is different for interacting fields, models with nonvanishing ground state expectation value and many body systems in the thermodynamic limit, where the Fock representation is not allowed and N is not a good quantum number for the characterization of the system since ˆ N is unbounded from above.”
  • Non-Fock representations are also required in order to describe many particle systems in the thermodynamic limit.

    “because non-Fock representations are also required in order to describe many particle systems in the thermodynamic limit.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 104

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. T. Krajewski, Group field theories, PoS(QGQGS 2011)005 [arXiv:1210.6257] [INSPIRE]. JHEP03(2015)084 · arXiv
  2. C. Rovelli, The Basis of the Ponzano-Regge-Turaev-Viro-Ooguri quantum gravity model in the loop representation basis, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2702 [hep-th/9304164] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press (2006).
  4. A. Baratin and D. Oriti, Group field theory and simplicial gravity path integrals: A model for Holst-Plebanski gravity, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 044003 [arXiv:1111.5842] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  5. D. Oriti, J.P. Ryan and J. Thürigen, Group field theories for all loop quantum gravity, arXiv:1409.3150 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  6. V. Rivasseau, Quantum Gravity and Renormalization: The Tensor Track, AIP Conf. Proc. 1444 (2011) 18 [arXiv:1112.5104] [INSPIRE]. JHEP03(2015)084 · DOI
  7. R. Gurau, The Double Scaling Limit in Arbitrary Dimensions: A Toy Model, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 124051 [arXiv:1110.2460] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  8. R. Gurau, Universality for Random Tensors, arXiv:1111.0519 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  9. R. Gurau and J.P. Ryan, Colored Tensor Models -A review, SIGMA 8 (2012) 020 [arXiv:1109.4812] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  10. S. Carrozza and D. Oriti, Bounding bubbles: the vertex representation of 3d Group Field Theory and the suppression of pseudo-manifolds, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 044004 [arXiv:1104.5158] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  11. S. Gielen, Perturbing a quantum gravity condensate, arXiv:1411.1077 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  12. T.A. Koslowski and H. Sahlmann, Loop quantum gravity vacuum with nondegenerate geometry, SIGMA 8 (2012) 026 [arXiv:1109.4688] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. D. Benedetti and J. Henson, Spacetime condensation in (2 + 1)-dimensional CDT from a Hořava-Lifshitz minisuperspace model, arXiv:1410.0845 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  14. J. Mielczarek, Big Bang as a critical point, arXiv:1404.0228 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  15. B. Bahr, B. Dittrich, F. Hellmann and W. Kamiński, Holonomy Spin Foam Models: Definition and Coarse Graining, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 044048 [arXiv:1208.3388] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. J. Ben Geloun, On the finite amplitudes for open graphs in Abelian dynamical colored Boulatov-Ooguri models, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 402002 [arXiv:1307.8299] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. D.O. Samary, β-functions of U(1) d gauge invariant just renormalizable tensor models, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 105003 [arXiv:1303.7256] [INSPIRE]. JHEP03(2015)084 · DOI
  18. A. Eichhorn and T.A. Koslowski, Continuum limit in matrix models for quantum gravity from the Functional Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 084016 [arXiv:1309.1690] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. A. Eichhorn and T.A. Koslowski, Towards phase transitions between discrete and continuum quantum spacetime from the Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 104039 [arXiv:1408.4127] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. V. Bonzom, R. Gurau and V. Rivasseau, Random tensor models in the large-N limit: Uncoloring the colored tensor models, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 084037 [arXiv:1202.3637] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch and F. Schutz, Introduction to the functional renormalization group, Lect. Notes Phys. 798 (2010) 1. · DOI
  22. D.F. Litim, Optimized renormalization group flows, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 105007 [hep-th/0103195] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. D. Benedetti and F. Caravelli, The Local potential approximation in quantum gravity, JHEP 06 (2012) 017 [Erratum ibid. 10 (2012) 157] [arXiv:1204.3541] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. D. Benedetti, Critical behavior in spherical and hyperbolic spaces, arXiv:1403.6712 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv

Authors
Benedetti, D., Geloun, J. B., & Oriti, D.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (DE)
  • Université d'Abomey-Calavi (BJ)
Corresponding author
Benedetti, Dario
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2015-03
Volume
2015
Issue
3
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111528318
Cited by
104
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 5
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › advanced mathematical theories
Keywords
functional renormalization group, tensorial group field theory, Gaussian fixed point, non-Gaussian fixed point, critical exponents, flowcharts, phase transitions, compact manifolds, nonlocal interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review