Cited by 90Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Canonical energy is quantum Fisher information

Open access
Lashkari, Nima, Van Raamsdonk, Mark·2016·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

In quantum information theory, Fisher Information is a natural metric on the space of perturbations to a density matrix, defined by calculating the relative entropy with the unperturbed state at quadratic order in perturbations. In gravitational physics, Canonical Energy defines a natural metric on the space of perturbations to spacetimes with a Killing horizon. In this paper, we show that the Fisher information metric for perturbations to the vacuum density matrix of a ball-shaped region B in a holographic CFT is dual to the canonical energy metric for perturbations to a corresponding Rindler wedge R B of Anti-de-Sitter space. Positivity of relative entropy at second order implies that the Fisher information metric is positive definite. Thus, for physical perturbations to anti-de-Sitter spacetime, the canonical energy associated to any Rindler wedge must be positive. This second-order constraint on the metric extends the first order result from relative entropy positivity that physical perturbations must satisfy the linearized Einstein’s equations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep04(2016)153

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quantum Fisher information of a perturbation of the density matrix in the CFT is dual to the bulk canonical energy of the dual linearized gravitational perturbation.

    “Therefore, the quantum Fisher information of a perturbation of the density matrix in the CFT is dual to the bulk canonical energy of the dual linearized gravitational perturbation [121].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lashkari, N., & Van Raamsdonk, M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Lashkari, Nima
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2016-04
Volume
2016
Issue
4
Pages
1-26
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141232908
Cited by
90
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation (376206)
  • Foundational Questions Institute
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (376206)
  • Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
quantum Fisher information, Fisher information metric, Kullback-Leibler divergence, holographic CFT, AdS/CFT correspondence, Rindler wedge, Killing horizons, linearized Einstein equations, quantum information geometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review