Canonical energy is quantum Fisher information
Open accessAbstract
In quantum information theory, Fisher Information is a natural metric on the space of perturbations to a density matrix, defined by calculating the relative entropy with the unperturbed state at quadratic order in perturbations. In gravitational physics, Canonical Energy defines a natural metric on the space of perturbations to spacetimes with a Killing horizon. In this paper, we show that the Fisher information metric for perturbations to the vacuum density matrix of a ball-shaped region B in a holographic CFT is dual to the canonical energy metric for perturbations to a corresponding Rindler wedge R B of Anti-de-Sitter space. Positivity of relative entropy at second order implies that the Fisher information metric is positive definite. Thus, for physical perturbations to anti-de-Sitter spacetime, the canonical energy associated to any Rindler wedge must be positive. This second-order constraint on the metric extends the first order result from relative entropy positivity that physical perturbations must satisfy the linearized Einstein’s equations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quantum Fisher information of a perturbation of the density matrix in the CFT is dual to the bulk canonical energy of the dual linearized gravitational perturbation.
“Therefore, the quantum Fisher information of a perturbation of the density matrix in the CFT is dual to the bulk canonical energy of the dual linearized gravitational perturbation [121].”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [121]
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436 · see citing works
The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1999) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1026654312961 · Cited by 6,704 · see citing works
Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 · Cited by 4,302 · see citing works
A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/062 · Cited by 1,822 · see citing works
A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0705.0016 · Cited by 1,822
Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT
Almheiri, A., Dong, X., & Harlow, D. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)163 · Cited by 802 · see citing works
Relative entropy and holography
Blanco, D. D., Casini, H., Hung, L.-Y., & Myers, R. C. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2013)060 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy
Jafferis, D. L., Lewkowycz, A., Maldacena, J., & Suh, S. J. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2016)004 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy
Jafferis, D. L., Lewkowycz, A., Maldacena, J., & Suh, S. J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.06431 · Cited by 534
Modular Hamiltonians of excited states, OPE blocks and emergent bulk fields
Sárosi, G., & Ugajin, T. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2018)012 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review
Kibe, T., Mandayam, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“perturbation of the density matrix in the CFT is dual to the bulk canonical energy of the dual linearized gravitational perturbation [121].”
Background
- Authors
- Lashkari, N., & Van Raamsdonk, M.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lashkari, Nima
- ORCID
- Lashkari, Nima
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 2016
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141232908
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Simons Foundation (376206)
- Foundational Questions Institute
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (376206)
- Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- quantum Fisher information, Fisher information metric, Kullback-Leibler divergence, holographic CFT, AdS/CFT correspondence, Rindler wedge, Killing horizons, linearized Einstein equations, quantum information geometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review