Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 17 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Small vacuum energy from small equivalence violation in scalar gravity

Open access
Agrawal, Prateek, Sundrum, Raman·2017·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

The theory of scalar gravity proposed by Nordström, and refined by Einstein and Fokker, provides a striking analogy to general relativity. In its modern form, scalar gravity appears as the low-energy effective field theory of the spontaneous breaking of conformal symmetry within a CFT, and is AdS/CFT dual to the original Randall-Sundrum I model, but without a UV brane. Scalar gravity faithfully exhibits several qualitative features of the cosmological constant problem of standard gravity coupled to quantum matter, and the Weinberg no-go theorem can be extended to this case as well. Remarkably, a solution to the scalar gravity cosmological constant problem has been proposed, where the key is a very small violation of the scalar equivalence principle, which can be elegantly formulated as a particular type of deformation of the CFT. In the dual AdS picture this involves implementing Goldberger-Wise radion stabilization where the Goldberger-Wise field is a pseudo-Nambu Goldstone boson. In quantum gravity however, global symmetries protecting pNGBs are not expected to be fundamental. We provide a natural six-dimensional gauge theory origin for this global symmetry and show that the violation of the equivalence principle and the size of the vacuum energy seen by scalar gravity can naturally be exponentially small. Our solution may be of interest for study of non-supersymmetric CFTs in the spontaneously broken phase.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper gives a six-dimensional gauge-theory origin for the small shift-symmetry violation needed in a scalar-gravity solution to the cosmological constant problem, where the Goldberger-Wise field is a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson. It argues that the equivalence-principle violation and the vacuum energy seen by scalar gravity can naturally be exponentially small.

Key findings

  • Scalar gravity, the Nordström/Einstein-Fokker theory, faithfully reproduces qualitative features of the cosmological constant problem, and the Weinberg no-go theorem extends to it; a proposed solution uses a very small violation of the scalar equivalence principle via a CFT deformation and Goldberger-Wise radion stabilization with a pNGB.
  • In the 6D construction, the Goldberger-Wise field is identified with the sixth component of a gauge field, \(A_6\), and its bulk potential arises from non-local Aharonov-Bohm phases: \(V_{\rm bulk}(\rho,\omega) \simeq \epsilon M_6^2 \cos(2\pi e\omega)\), with \(\epsilon = \frac{1}{2\pi\rho M_6^6}\frac{m_\xi}{4\pi^2\rho^{5/2}} e^{-2\pi\rho m_\xi}\), exponentially suppressed when \(2\pi\rho m_\xi \gg 1\).
  • Dimensional reduction gives the desired 5D effective action with an approximate shift symmetry; higher-dimensional operators and corrections are suppressed by \(\epsilon\), so the dilaton potential remains of the form \(\kappa(g(\phi))\phi^4\) and the \(\beta\)-function stays parametrically small.
  • The paper notes that scalar gravity replicates the hierarchy \(\lambda \sim 10^{-120}\), and that the 6D parameters can yield \(\epsilon \sim 10^{-120}\) with \(N=\rho m_\xi \sim 100\), under mild hierarchies \(M_5 > M_6 > m_\xi > 1/\rho > k_5 \gg M_{\rm pl}\).

Methods

  • Theoretical effective-field-theory construction: review of the 4D dilaton potential and CFT deformation, the 5D AdS/CFT dual of RS1 without a UV brane, and a 6D warped effective theory with a compact sixth dimension, gauge field \(A_6\), heavy charged scalar, and axion.
  • Derives equations of motion and junction conditions, solves perturbatively in the backreaction parameter \(\eta\) and small explicit breaking \(\epsilon\), and matches the 6D solution to the 5D effective action and radion/dilaton potential.
  • No experimental data or numerical simulation; the analysis is analytic and based on effective field theory.

Limitations

  • Stated: a full solution must also address cosmological evolution including obtaining a hot big bang, left for future work; embedding in a full string theory UV completion is beyond scope; translating the \(A_6\) mechanism into 4D QFT language is left for future work; scalar gravity itself is experimentally ruled out, e.g. light does not bend in a scalar gravity field.
  • Stated/evident: the 5D analysis assumes small backreaction, small \(\omega_*\), and neglects higher-order potential terms; perturbation in \(\eta\) requires a shift symmetry to ensure higher-order corrections remain higher order in \(\epsilon\); quantum-gravity breaking of global symmetries motivates the 6D gauge construction, but a full quantum-gravity completion is not provided.
  • Evident: no observational tests or quantitative cosmological predictions are presented; the mechanism addresses particle-physics fine-tuning rather than cosmological dynamics.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep05(2017)144

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 14 Not checked · 50 Own results and interpretations

38 more claims

Create a free account to see all 64 claims and to verify the 13 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 16
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 6

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. A. Pomarol, Elementary or Composite: The particle physics dilemma, at The XVI IFT UAM/CSIC Xmas Workshop, Madrid Spain (2010).
  2. A. Lewandowski and R. Sundrum, RS1, higher derivatives and stability, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 044003 [ hep-th/0108025 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Agrawal, P., & Sundrum, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Agrawal, Prateek
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2017-05
Volume
2017
Issue
5
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2552624315
Cited by
12
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1315155, 1216270)
  • Aspen Center for Physics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
scalar gravity, Nordström theory, cosmological constant problem, vacuum energy, equivalence principle violation, conformal symmetry breaking, CFT, AdS/CFT correspondence, Randall-Sundrum model, Goldberger-Wise mechanism, radion stabilization, pseudo-Goldstone bosons, global symmetries, six-dimensional gauge theory, effective field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.