The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulus Stabilization with Bulk Fields
Open accessAbstract
We propose a mechanism for stabilizing the size of the extra dimension in the Randall-Sundrum scenario. The potential for the modulus field that sets the size of the fifth dimension is generated by a bulk scalar with quartic interactions localized on the two 3-branes. The minimum of this potential yields a compactification scale that solves the hierarchy problem without fine-tuning of parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it just involves a particular implementation of the Goldberger-Wise (GW) radion stabilization mechanism [13] where the GW field is a pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Boson (pNGB).”
From Small vacuum energy from small equivalence violation in scalar gravity (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“If we neglect the backreaction of the GW field on the metric, then we can write the solution for its equation of motion in a background AdS space”
From Small vacuum energy from small equivalence violation in scalar gravity (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions
Hořava, P., & Witten, E. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00621-4 · Cited by 1,984
Cited by
de Rham, C. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-7 · Cited by 1,120
Universal aspects of gravity localized on thick branes
Csáki, C., Erlich, J., Hollowood, T. J., & Shirman, Y. (2000) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00271-6 · Cited by 464
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
General brane cosmologies and their global spacetime structure
Bowcock, P., Charmousis, C., & Gregory, R. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/313 · Cited by 276
Casimir energy and radius stabilization in five and six dimensional orbifolds
Pontón, E., & Poppitz, E. (2001) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/019 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberger, W. D., & Wise, M. B.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-12-13
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4922-4925
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2009173309
- Cited by
- 1,436
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 59.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modulus Stabilization with Bulk Fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.83.4922
- The paper
- Goldberger, W. D., & Wise, M. B. (1999). Modulus Stabilization with Bulk Fields. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.83.4922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
