Cited by 70Particle physics theoretical and experimental studiesQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications

On the gauge dependence of the Standard Model vacuum instability scale

Open access
Di Luzio, Luca, Mihaila, Luminita·2014·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

After reviewing the calculation of the Standard Model one-loop effective potential in a class of linear gauges, we discuss the physical observables entering the vacuum stability analysis. While the electroweak-vacuum-stability bound on the Higgs boson mass can be formally proven to be gauge independent, the field value at which the effective potential turns negative (the so-called instability scale) is a gauge dependent quantity. By varying the gauge-fixing scheme and the gauge-fixing parameters in their perturbative domain, we find an irreducible theoretical uncertainty of at least two orders of magnitude on the scale at which the Standard Model vacuum becomes unstable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep06(2014)079

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The instability scale h_max, defined as the Higgs field value at which V_eff(h) is maximal, is gauge-dependent.

    “however the instability scale of the SM potential, e.g.h max , defined as the Higgs field value at which V eff (h) is maximal, is gauge-dependent (as recently emphasised in [32][33][34]).”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [32]

  • The critical Higgs mass below which the Standard Model Higgs potential becomes unstable is gauge-independent.

    “The critical Higgs mass below which the SM Higgs potential becomes unstable is gaugeindependent;”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [32]

  • The order-of-magnitude gauge dependence of h_max found in [32] disappears because it is almost entirely due to the RG factor Γ.

    “The order-of-magnitude gauge dependence of h max found in [32] disappears because it is almost entirely due to the RG factor Γ.”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [32]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Luzio, L., & Mihaila, L.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2014-06
Volume
2014
Issue
6
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095198080
Cited by
70
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TR/9)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Keywords
gauge dependence, one-loop effective potential, gauge-fixing parameter, Higgs mass limits, electroweak vacuum, theoretical uncertainties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review