CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The information theoretic interpretation of the length of a curve

Czech, Bartlomiej, Hayden, Patrick, Lashkari, Nima, Swingle, Brian·2015·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep06(2015)157
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep06(2015)157

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 a) Geodesic g I , which subtends a boundary interval I (black) and geodesics, which are tangent to g I on the boundary along with the corresponding boundary intervals I ( x ) (color). The dashed geodesics contribute zero to integral (2.3). b) a I ( x ), the linear size of the interval I ( x ) centered at x .
Figure 1 a) Geodesic g I , which subtends a boundary interval I (black) and geodesics, which are tangent to g I on the boundary along with the corresponding boundary intervals I ( x ) (color). The dashed geodesics contribute zero to integral (2.3). b) a I ( x ), the linear size of the interval I ( x ) centered at x .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 a) A curve, which asymptotes to the geodesic g I . We have marked in color the geodesics tangent to the curve and the boundary intervals J ( x ), which they subtend. b) a plot of a J ( x ) -the length of the intervals J ( x ) as a function of the centerpoint x . If the curve asymptotes to the geodesic g I then a J ( x ) must agree with a I ( x ) (shown for comparison in dashed gray) outside some interval ( x L , x R ) [25].
Figure 2 a) A curve, which asymptotes to the geodesic g I . We have marked in color the geodesics tangent to the curve and the boundary intervals J ( x ), which they subtend. b) a plot of a J ( x ) -the length of the intervals J ( x ) as a function of the centerpoint x . If the curve asymptotes to the geodesic g I then a J ( x ) must agree with a I ( x ) (shown for comparison in dashed gray) outside some interval ( x L , x R ) [25].CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 The way to read off ¯ a I,J ( r ) from the plot of a I,J ( x ) / 2.
Figure 3 The way to read off ¯ a I,J ( r ) from the plot of a I,J ( x ) / 2.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 a) The intervals J ( θ ) defined by a closed, convex curve in global AdS 3 . b) The intervals (2.16)-(2.17) initially held by Alice and Bob. We have indicated J ( θ N ) and J ( θ 2 N ) and the bulk axis, which joins their centers.
Figure 4 a) The intervals J ( θ ) defined by a closed, convex curve in global AdS 3 . b) The intervals (2.16)-(2.17) initially held by Alice and Bob. We have indicated J ( θ N ) and J ( θ 2 N ) and the bulk axis, which joins their centers.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Intermediate stage in a constrained merging protocol. The top row depicts the interval I = [ L, R ] with endpoints L and R . Step x of the protocol acts on interval I ( x ) = [ ℓ ( x ) , r ( x )], drawn in the second row. Because r ( x ) is non-decreasing with x , the sites marked by the orange bar have not yet been acted upon. The third row depicts the interval I ( x +1) = [ ℓ ( x +1) , r ( x +1)]. Once step x is complete, none of the sites indicated by the green bar will ever be acted upon again since ℓ ( x ) is non-decreasing with x . Therefore, after step x the reduced density operators corresponding to the green marked sites on B and the orange marked sites on A should approximate the reduced density operator of the target state | ψ 〉 .
Figure 5 Intermediate stage in a constrained merging protocol. The top row depicts the interval I = [ L, R ] with endpoints L and R . Step x of the protocol acts on interval I ( x ) = [ ℓ ( x ) , r ( x )], drawn in the second row. Because r ( x ) is non-decreasing with x , the sites marked by the orange bar have not yet been acted upon. The third row depicts the interval I ( x +1) = [ ℓ ( x +1) , r ( x +1)]. Once step x is complete, none of the sites indicated by the green bar will ever be acted upon again since ℓ ( x ) is non-decreasing with x . Therefore, after step x the reduced density operators corresponding to the green marked sites on B and the orange marked sites on A should approximate the reduced density operator of the target state | ψ 〉 .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Sequential merging error. The top line depicts the interval I = [ L, R ] and a set of merging constraints in the form of intervals I ( x ) depicted as green ovals. The state to be merged is a maximally entangled state shared between L and R , as illustrated in the second line. One way to merge this state is for Bob to prepare a maximally entangled state between L and L +1 in the first sequential merging step and then, in the subsequent steps, simply swap the information to the right until a maximally entangled state is established between L and R . This procedure doesn't require any Alice-Bob entanglement and yet produces long-range entanglement in Bob's lab. It is prohibited by the sequential merging error condition because, while the final state is correct, the intermediate state fails the sequential merging condition. The joint state of Bob's L and Alice's R is not correct at the intermediate merging steps after L has been completed and before R has been reached; they should be maximally entangled but instead they are product.
Figure 6 Sequential merging error. The top line depicts the interval I = [ L, R ] and a set of merging constraints in the form of intervals I ( x ) depicted as green ovals. The state to be merged is a maximally entangled state shared between L and R , as illustrated in the second line. One way to merge this state is for Bob to prepare a maximally entangled state between L and L +1 in the first sequential merging step and then, in the subsequent steps, simply swap the information to the right until a maximally entangled state is established between L and R . This procedure doesn't require any Alice-Bob entanglement and yet produces long-range entanglement in Bob's lab. It is prohibited by the sequential merging error condition because, while the final state is correct, the intermediate state fails the sequential merging condition. The joint state of Bob's L and Alice's R is not correct at the intermediate merging steps after L has been completed and before R has been reached; they should be maximally entangled but instead they are product.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 7 a) A surface in Poincar´ e AdS 4 built up from minimal surfaces anchored on a sequence of boundary circles. Its area computes the entanglement cost of a constrained merging protocol. b) A surface built up from a cycle of minimal surfaces. Its area computes the entanglement cost of a constrained swapping protocol.
Figure 7 a) A surface in Poincar´ e AdS 4 built up from minimal surfaces anchored on a sequence of boundary circles. Its area computes the entanglement cost of a constrained merging protocol. b) A surface built up from a cycle of minimal surfaces. Its area computes the entanglement cost of a constrained swapping protocol.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. J.M. Maldacena, The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [ hep-th/9711200 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [ hep-th/9802150 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. J.M. Maldacena, TASI 2003 lectures on AdS/CFT, hep-th/0309246 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  4. S.A. Hartnoll, Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224002 [ arXiv:0903.3246 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  5. P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 111601 [ hep-th/0405231 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  6. C.P. Herzog, P. Kovtun, S. Sachdev and D.T. Son, Quantum critical transport, duality and M-theory, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 085020 [ hep-th/0701036 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  7. V. Balasubramanian and B. Czech, Quantitative approaches to information recovery from black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 163001 [ arXiv:1102.3566 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  8. T. Jacobson, Boundary unitarity and the black hole information paradox, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 22 (2013) 1342002 [ arXiv:1212.6944 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  9. L. Susskind and E. Witten, The holographic bound in Anti-de Sitter space, hep-th/9805114 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  10. E.T. Akhmedov, A remark on the AdS/CFT correspondence and the renormalization group flow, Phys. Lett. B 442 (1998) 152 [ hep-th/9806217 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  11. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, Space-time and the holographic renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3605 [ hep-th/9903190 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  12. J. de Boer, E.P. Verlinde and H.L. Verlinde, On the holographic renormalization group, JHEP 08 (2000) 003 [ hep-th/9912012 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  13. V. Balasubramanian, M. Guica and A. Lawrence, Holographic interpretations of the renormalization group, JHEP 01 (2013) 115 [ arXiv:1211.1729 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  14. S. Jackson, R. Pourhasan and H. Verlinde, Geometric RG flow, arXiv:1312.6914 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  15. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [ hep-th/0603001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [ hep-th/0605073 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. G.T. Horowitz and D. Marolf, A new approach to string cosmology, JHEP 07 (1998) 014 [ hep-th/9805207 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  18. V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus, A.E. Lawrence and S.P. Trivedi, Holographic probes of Anti-de Sitter space-times, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 104021 [ hep-th/9808017 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  19. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in Anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [ hep-th/0106112 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323 [ arXiv:1005.3035 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  21. B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, Rindler quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 235025 [ arXiv:1206.1323 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  22. V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf and S.F. Ross, Multiboundary wormholes and holographic entanglement, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 185015 [ arXiv:1406.2663 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  23. M. Headrick and T. Takayanagi, A holographic proof of the strong subadditivity of entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 106013 [ arXiv:0704.3719 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  24. B. Czech and L. Lamprou, Holographic definition of points and distances, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 106005 [ arXiv:1409.4473 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  25. H. Casini and M. Huerta, A c-theorem for the entanglement entropy, J. Phys. A 40 (2007) 7031 [ cond-mat/0610375 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  26. P. Hayden, M. Headrick and A. Maloney, Holographic mutual information is monogamous, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 046003 [ arXiv:1107.2940 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  27. B. Swingle, Entanglement renormalization and holography, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065007 [ arXiv:0905.1317 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  28. M. Van Raamsdonk, Comments on quantum gravity and entanglement, arXiv:0907.2939 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  29. B. Swingle, Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormalization, arXiv:1209.3304 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  30. E. Bianchi and R.C. Myers, On the architecture of spacetime geometry, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 214002 [ arXiv:1212.5183 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  31. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time evolution of entanglement entropy from black hole interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [ arXiv:1303.1080 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  32. R.C. Myers, R. Pourhasan and M. Smolkin, On spacetime entanglement, JHEP 06 (2013) 013 [ arXiv:1304.2030 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  33. V. Balasubramanian, B. Czech, B.D. Chowdhury and J. de Boer, The entropy of a hole in spacetime, JHEP 10 (2013) 220 [ arXiv:1305.0856 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  34. X.-L. Qi, Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry, arXiv:1309.6282 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  35. D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and shock wave geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 126007 [ arXiv:1406.2678 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  36. V. Balasubramanian, B.D. Chowdhury, B. Czech, J. de Boer and M.P. Heller, Bulk curves from boundary data in holography, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 086004 [ arXiv:1310.4204 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  37. M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim and A. Winter, Partial quantum information, Nature 436 (2005) 673 [ quant-ph/0505062 ]. · DOI
  38. M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim and A. Winter, Quantum state merging and negative information, Commun. Math. Phys. 269 (2007) 107 [ quant-ph/0512247 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  39. B. Schumacher, Quantum coding, Phys. Rev. A 51 (1995) 2738. · DOI · Paper page
  40. R.C. Myers, J. Rao and S. Sugishita, Holographic holes in higher dimensions, JHEP 06 (2014) 044 [ arXiv:1403.3416 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  41. B. Czech, X. Dong and J. Sully, Holographic reconstruction of general bulk surfaces, JHEP 11 (2014) 015 [ arXiv:1406.4889 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  42. V. Balasubramanian, B.D. Chowdhury, B. Czech and J. de Boer, Entwinement and the emergence of spacetime, JHEP 01 (2015) 048 [ arXiv:1406.5859 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  43. J. Wien, A holographic approach to spacetime entanglement, arXiv:1408.6005 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  44. M. Headrick, R.C. Myers and J. Wien, Holographic holes and differential entropy, JHEP 10 (2014) 149 [ arXiv:1408.4770 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  45. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin and W.K. Wootters, Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996) 3824 [ quant-ph/9604024 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. I. Devetak and A. Winter, Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 461 (2005) 207 [ quant-ph/0306078 ]. · DOI
  47. C.A. Fuchs and J. van de Graaf, Cryptographic distinguishability measures for quantum-mechanical states, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 45 (1999) 1216 [ quant-ph/9712042 ]. · DOI
  48. R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Continuity of quantum conditional information, J. Phys. A 37 (2004) L55 [ quant-ph/0312081 ]. · arXiv
  49. F. Dupuis, M. Berta, J. Wullschleger and R. Renner, One-shot decoupling, Commun. Math. Phys. 328 (2014) 251 [ arXiv:1012.6044 ]. · DOI
  50. A. Vitanov, F. Dupuis, M. Tomamichel and R. Renner, Chain rules for smooth min- and max-entropies, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 59 (2013) 2603. · DOI
  51. P. Calabrese and A. Lefevre, Entanglement spectrum in one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 032329 [ arXiv:0806.3059 ]. · DOI
  52. V.E. Hubeny, Covariant residual entropy, JHEP 09 (2014) 156 [ arXiv:1406.4611 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  53. B. Swingle and I.H. Kim, Reconstructing quantum states from local data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 260501 [ arXiv:1407.2658 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  54. D. Poulin and M.B. Hastings, Markov entropy decomposition: a variational dual for quantum belief propagation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 080403 [ arXiv:1012.2050 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  55. Y.-K. Liu, Consistency of local density matrices is qma-complete, in Approximation, randomization, and combinatorial optimization. algorithms and techniques, Springer, Germany (2006). · DOI
  56. P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz and A. Winter, Structure of states which satisfy strong subadditivity of quantum entropy with equality, Commun. Math. Phys. 246 (2004) 359 [ quant-ph/0304007 ]. · DOI · Paper page
  57. O. Fawzi and R. Renner, Quantum conditional mutual information and approximate quantum Markov chains, arXiv:1410.0664 . · arXiv
  58. M.B. Ruskai, Inequalities for quantum entropy: a review with conditions for equality, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 4358 [ quant-ph/0205064 ]. · DOI
  59. H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036 [ arXiv:1102.0440 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  60. J. Schwinger, Commutation relations and conservation laws, Phys. Rev. 130 (1963) 406. · DOI
  61. F. Nogueira, Extremal surfaces in asymptotically AdS charged boson stars backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 106006 [ arXiv:1301.4316 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  62. S.A. Gentle and M. Rangamani, Holographic entanglement and causal information in coherent states, JHEP 01 (2014) 120 [ arXiv:1311.0015 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  63. M. Headrick, Entanglement Renyi entropies in holographic theories, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 126010 [ arXiv:1006.0047 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  64. V.E. Hubeny, Extremal surfaces as bulk probes in AdS/CFT, JHEP 07 (2012) 093 [ arXiv:1203.1044 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  65. V.E. Hubeny, H. Maxfield, M. Rangamani and E. Tonni, Holographic entanglement plateaux, JHEP 08 (2013) 092 [ arXiv:1306.4004 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  66. R. Blume-Kohout, S. Croke, and D. Gottesman, Streaming universal distortion-free entanglement concentration, arXiv:0910.5952 . · arXiv
  67. E.H. Lieb and M.B. Ruskai, Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy, J. Math. Phys. 14 (1973) 1938. · DOI · Paper page
  68. M. Tomamichel, R. Colbeck, and R. Renner, Duality between smooth min-and max-entropies, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 56 (2010) 4674. · DOI
  69. E.H. Lieb, Convex trace functions and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson conjecture, Adv. Math. 11 (1973) 267. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Czech, B., Hayden, P., Lashkari, N., & Swingle, B.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-06
Volume
2015
Issue
6
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep06(2015)157
Cited by
45
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review