Cited by 1,555Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter

Open access
Maldacena, Juan·2003·Journal of High Energy Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maldacena, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Maldacena, Juan
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2003-04-12
Volume
2003
Issue
04
Pages
021-021
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060083150
Cited by
1,555
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 27
FWCI
20.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
eternal black holes, anti-de Sitter space, conformal field theory, entanglement, black hole information paradox, black hole complementarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review