Cited by 30Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scanning tunneling macroscopy, black holes and AdS/CFT bulk locality

Open access
Rey, Soo-Jong, Rosenhaus, Vladimir·2014·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

We establish resolution bounds on reconstructing a bulk field from boundary data on a timelike hypersurface. If the bulk only supports propagating modes, reconstruction is complete. If the bulk also supports evanescent modes, local reconstruction is not achievable unless one has exponential precision in knowledge of the boundary data. Without exponential precision, for a Minkowski bulk, one can reconstruct a spatially coarse-grained bulk field, but only out to a depth set by the coarse-graining scale. For an asymptotically AdS bulk, reconstruction is limited to a spatial coarse-graining proper distance set by the AdS scale. AdS black holes admit evanescent modes. We study the resolution bound in the large AdS black hole background and provide a dual CFT interpretation. Our results demonstrate that, if there is a black hole of any size in the bulk, then sub-AdS bulk locality is no longer well-encoded in boundary data in terms of local CFT operators. Specifically, in order to probe the bulk on sub-AdS scales using only boundary data in terms of local operators, one must either have such data to exponential precision or make further assumptions about the bulk state.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep07(2014)050

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, Decoding the hologram: Scalar fields interacting with gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 066010 [ arXiv:1311.3020 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  2. I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Bulk and Transhorizon Measurements in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2012) 165 [ arXiv:1201.3664 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  3. V. Rosenhaus, Holography for a small world, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 106004 [ arXiv:1309.4526 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  4. W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Coarse-grained entropy and causal holographic information in AdS/CFT, JHEP 03 (2014) 118 [ arXiv:1309.3610 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  5. N. Lashkari, M.B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitational dynamics from entanglement ’thermodynamics’, JHEP 04 (2014) 195 [ arXiv:1308.3716 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R.C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs, JHEP 03 (2014) 051 [ arXiv:1312.7856 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Extremal Surface Barriers, JHEP 03 (2014) 068 [ arXiv:1312.3699 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  8. V.E. Hubeny and H. Maxfield, Holographic probes of collapsing black holes, JHEP 03 (2014) 097 [ arXiv:1312.6887 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  9. V. Balasubramanian, B.D. Chowdhury, B. Czech, J. de Boer and M.P. Heller, A hole-ographic spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 086004 [ arXiv:1310.4204 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  10. R. Bousso, B. Freivogel, S. Leichenauer, V. Rosenhaus and C. Zukowski, Null Geodesics, Local CFT Operators and AdS/CFT for Subregions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064057 [ arXiv:1209.4641 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  11. S. Leichenauer and V. Rosenhaus, AdS black holes, the bulk-boundary dictionary and smearing functions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 026003 [ arXiv:1304.6821 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  12. C. Keeler, G. Knodel and J.T. Liu, What do non-relativistic CFTs tell us about Lifshitz spacetimes?, JHEP 01 (2014) 062 [ arXiv:1308.5689 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  13. T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec, AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, hep-th/9808016 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  14. A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 086003 [ hep-th/0506118 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  15. A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [ hep-th/0606141 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  16. S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee, Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large-N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 22 (2001) 379 [ hep-th/9803001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  17. J.M. Maldacena, Wilson loops in large-N field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859 [ hep-th/9803002 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  18. J. Polchinski, L. Susskind and N. Toumbas, Negative energy, superluminosity and holography, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 084006 [ hep-th/9903228 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  19. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [ hep-th/0603001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. R.M. Wald, General Relativity, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago U.S.A. (1984). · DOI · Paper page
  21. D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets, Minkowski space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications, JHEP 09 (2002) 042 [ hep-th/0205051 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS 2 Backreaction and Holography, arXiv:1402.6334 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  23. L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2012). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Rey, S.-J., & Rosenhaus, V.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Rey, Soo-Jong
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2014-07
Volume
2014
Issue
7
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051677080
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2012K2A1A9055280, 2005-0093843, 2010-220-C00003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
AdS/CFT correspondence, bulk locality, evanescent modes, asymptotically AdS black holes, coarse-graining, timelike hypersurfaces, local operators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review