Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Averaged null energy condition from causality

Hartman, Thomas, Kundu, Sandipan, Tajdini, Amirhossein·2017·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep07(2017)066
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep07(2017)066

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Kinematics for the derivation of the ANEC. The leading correction to the ψψ OPE is the null energy integrated over the red line, which in the limit of large u takes the form 〈 O ∫ duT uu O 〉 . This is then related to an expectation value by a Euclidean rotation.
Figure 1 Kinematics for the derivation of the ANEC. The leading correction to the ψψ OPE is the null energy integrated over the red line, which in the limit of large u takes the form 〈 O ∫ duT uu O 〉 . This is then related to an expectation value by a Euclidean rotation.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Operator insertions in Minkowski spacetime. In the limit where the two ψ 's become null, but are widely separated in u , the leading non-identity term in the ψψ OPE is ∫ duT uu , integrated over the red null line.
Figure 2 Operator insertions in Minkowski spacetime. In the limit where the two ψ 's become null, but are widely separated in u , the leading non-identity term in the ψψ OPE is ∫ duT uu , integrated over the red null line.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Operator insertions on the τy -plane defining the smeared 4-point function 〈 Θ 0 Θ 0 〉 .
Figure 3 Operator insertions on the τy -plane defining the smeared 4-point function 〈 Θ 0 Θ 0 〉 .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Two different ways to interpret the same Euclidean theory. The Euclidean R d (horizontal orange plane, parameterized by ( τ, y, ⃗ x )) is the same in both pictures, but the definition of states and corresponding notion of Minkowski spacetime (vertical blue planes) is different in the two cases. On the left, the continuation to Lorentzian is τ → it , states of the theory are defined on the plane τ = 0, and y is a space direction. On the right, the continuation to Lorentzian is y → it ′ , states are defined at y = 0, and τ = y ′ is a space direction. The two theories are identical, since they are determined by the same set of Euclidean correlators, but the map of observables and matrix elements from one description to the other is nontrivial.
Figure 4 Two different ways to interpret the same Euclidean theory. The Euclidean R d (horizontal orange plane, parameterized by ( τ, y, ⃗ x )) is the same in both pictures, but the definition of states and corresponding notion of Minkowski spacetime (vertical blue planes) is different in the two cases. On the left, the continuation to Lorentzian is τ → it , states of the theory are defined on the plane τ = 0, and y is a space direction. On the right, the continuation to Lorentzian is y → it ′ , states are defined at y = 0, and τ = y ′ is a space direction. The two theories are identical, since they are determined by the same set of Euclidean correlators, but the map of observables and matrix elements from one description to the other is nontrivial.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. A. Borde, Geodesic focusing, energy conditions and singularities, Class. Quant. Grav. 4 (1987) 343 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  2. T.A. Roman, Quantum stress energy tensors and the weak energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 3526 [ INSPIRE ].
  3. T.A. Roman, On the “averaged weak energy condition” and Penrose’s singularity theorem, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 546 [ INSPIRE ].
  4. V.P. Frolov and I.D. Novikov, Black hole physics: basic concepts and new developments, Kluwer Academic, Norwell MA U.S.A., (1998) [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  5. M.S. Morris, K.S. Thorne and U. Yurtsever, Wormholes, time machines and the weak energy condition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1446 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. J.L. Friedman, K. Schleich and D.M. Witt, Topological censorship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1486 [Erratum ibid. 75 (1995) 1872] [ gr-qc/9305017 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. A.C. Wall, Proving the achronal averaged null energy condition from the generalized second law, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 024038 [ arXiv:0910.5751 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  8. N. Graham and K.D. Olum, Achronal averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 064001 [ arXiv:0705.3193 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  9. T. Faulkner, R.G. Leigh, O. Parrikar and H. Wang, Modular Hamiltonians for deformed half-spaces and the averaged null energy condition, JHEP 09 (2016) 038 [ arXiv:1605.08072 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. G. Klinkhammer, Averaged energy conditions for free scalar fields in flat space-times, Phys. Rev. 43 (1991) 2542 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  11. R.M. Wald and U. Yurtsever, General proof of the averaged null energy condition for a massless scalar field in two-dimensional curved space-time, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 403 [ INSPIRE ].
  12. A. Folacci, Averaged null energy condition for electromagnetism in Minkowski space-time, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2726 [ INSPIRE ].
  13. R. Verch, The averaged null energy condition for general quantum field theories in two-dimensions, J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 206 [ math-ph/9904036 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  14. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Proof of the quantum null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 024017 [ arXiv:1509.02542 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  15. J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP 08 (2016) 106 [ arXiv:1503.01409 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  16. T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, Causality constraints in conformal field theory, JHEP 05 (2016) 099 [ arXiv:1509.00014 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  17. D.M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, Conformal collider physics: energy and charge correlations, JHEP 05 (2008) 012 [ arXiv:0803.1467 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  18. T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, A new spin on causality constraints, JHEP 10 (2016) 141 [ arXiv:1601.07904 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  19. D.M. Hofman, D. Li, D. Meltzer, D. Poland and F. Rejon-Barrera, A proof of the conformal collider bounds, JHEP 06 (2016) 111 [ arXiv:1603.03771 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  20. S. Gao and R.M. Wald, Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 4999 [ gr-qc/0007021 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  21. S. Dubovsky, T. Gregoire, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Null energy condition and superluminal propagation, JHEP 03 (2006) 025 [ hep-th/0512260 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  22. W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Holographic proof of the averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 106003 [Erratum ibid. 91 (2015) 069902] [ arXiv:1408.3566 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  23. N. Engelhardt and S. Fischetti, The gravity dual of boundary causality, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 175004 [ arXiv:1604.03944 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  24. J. Cardy, Quantum quenches to a critical point in one dimension: some further results, J. Stat. Mech. 02 (2016) 023103 [ arXiv:1507.07266 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  25. A. Allais and E. Tonni, Holographic evolution of the mutual information, JHEP 01 (2012) 102 [ arXiv:1110.1607 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  26. A.C. Wall, Maximin surfaces and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [ arXiv:1211.3494 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  27. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [ arXiv:1506.02669 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  28. R.C. Myers and A. Sinha, Seeing a c-theorem with holography, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 046006 [ arXiv:1006.1263 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  29. R.C. Myers and A. Sinha, Holographic c-theorems in arbitrary dimensions, JHEP 01 (2011) 125 [ arXiv:1011.5819 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  30. D.L. Jafferis, I.R. Klebanov, S.S. Pufu and B.R. Safdi, Towards the F-theorem: N = 2 field theories on the three-sphere, JHEP 06 (2011) 102 [ arXiv:1103.1181 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  31. H. Casini and M. Huerta, On the RG running of the entanglement entropy of a circle, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 125016 [ arXiv:1202.5650 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  32. Z. Komargodski and A. Schwimmer, On renormalization group flows in four dimensions, JHEP 12 (2011) 099 [ arXiv:1107.3987 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  33. R. Haag, Local quantum physics: fields, particles, algebras, Springer, Berlin Germany, (1992) [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  34. Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov, Convexity and liberation at large spin, JHEP 11 (2013) 140 [ arXiv:1212.4103 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  35. A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The analytic bootstrap and AdS superhorizon locality, JHEP 12 (2013) 004 [ arXiv:1212.3616 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  36. J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214011 [ arXiv:1112.1016 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  37. R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher and J. Maldacena, Entropy on a null surface for interacting quantum field theories and the Bousso bound, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 084030 [ arXiv:1406.4545 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  38. D.M. Hofman, Higher derivative gravity, causality and positivity of energy in a UV complete QFT, Nucl. Phys. B 823 (2009) 174 [ arXiv:0907.1625 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  39. H. Osborn and A.C. Petkou, Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions, Annals Phys. 231 (1994) 311 [ hep-th/9307010 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  40. B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, B. Mosk and J. Sully, A stereoscopic look into the bulk, JHEP 07 (2016) 129 [ arXiv:1604.03110 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  41. H. Casini, Wedge reflection positivity, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 435202 [ arXiv:1009.3832 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  42. A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [ hep-th/0602178 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  43. D. Chowdhury, S. Raju, S. Sachdev, A. Singh and P. Strack, Multipoint correlators of conformal field theories: implications for quantum critical transport, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 085138 [ arXiv:1210.5247 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  44. Z. Komargodski, M. Kulaxizi, A. Parnachev and A. Zhiboedov, Conformal field theories and deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 065011 [ arXiv:1601.05453 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  45. M.S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning conformal correlators, JHEP 11 (2011) 071 [ arXiv:1107.3554 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  46. S. Giombi and X. Yin, Higher spin gauge theory and holography: the three-point functions, JHEP 09 (2010) 115 [ arXiv:0912.3462 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hartman, T., Kundu, S., & Tajdini, A.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-07
Volume
2017
Issue
7
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep07(2017)066
Cited by
185
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.