The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topological censorship
Abstract
All three-manifolds are known to occur as Cauchy surfaces of asymptotically flat vacuum spacetimes and of spacetimes with positive-energy sources. We prove here the conjecture that general relativity does not allow an observer to probe the topology of spacetime: Any topological structure collapses too quickly to allow light to traverse it. More precisely, in a globally hyperbolic, asymptotically flat spacetime satisfying the null energy condition, every causal curve from ${\mathit{scrI}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$ to ${\mathit{scrI}}^{+}$ is homotopic to a topologically trivial curve from ${\mathit{scrI}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$ to ${\mathit{scrI}}^{+}$.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To first order in h, the GSL implies the condition of Graham and Olum.
“Then [18] showed that to first order in h, the GSL implies the condition of Graham and Olum.”
From The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem (2013) · cites this paper as [18]
If the generalized second law is true in all states, its time-reverse must also be true in all states.
“And if the GSL is true in all states, its time-reverse must also be true in all states [18].”
From The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem (2013) · cites this paper as [18]
Any divergences in the entanglement entropy near the boundary must be the same on both sides.
“Furthermore any divergences in the entanglement entropy near the boundary must be the same on both sides [18].”
From The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem (2013) · cites this paper as [18]
So long as the infinite quantities subtracted off of the entropy of a region only depend on extensive, Lorentz invariant features of the region's boundary, the divergent terms combine in such a way as to cancel out of the final result.
“However, so long as the infinite quantities subtracted off of the entropy of a region only depend on extensive, Lorentz invariant features of the region's boundary, the divergent terms combine in such a way as to cancel out of the final result.”
From The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem (2013) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time
Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524646 · Cited by 10,624
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- D. M. Witt, 1986, Phys. Rev. Lett., 57, 1386, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1386 · DOI
- D. Gannon, 1975, J. Math. Phys., 16, 2364, 10.1063/1.522498 · DOI
- C. W. Lee, 1976, Commun. Math. Phys., 51, 157, 10.1007/BF01609346 · DOI
- G. J. Galloway, 1983, J. Phys. A, 16, 1435, 10.1088/0305-4470/16/7/019 · DOI
- R. Penrose, 1969, Riv. Nuovo Cimento, 1, 252
- R. Geroch, 1979, General Relativity, an Einstein Centenary Survey
- F. J. Tipler, 1978, J. Diff. Geometry, 30, 165
- F. J. Tipler, 1978, Phys. Rev. D, 17, 2521, 10.1103/PhysRevD.17.2521 · DOI
- A. Borde, 1987, Classical Quantum Gravity, 4, 343, 10.1088/0264-9381/4/2/015 · DOI
- M. S. Morris, 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 1446, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1446 · DOI · Paper page
- R. Schoen, 1981, Commun. Math. Phys., 79, 231, 10.1007/BF01942062 · DOI
- S. W. Hawking, 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 603, 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.603 · DOI
- R. M. Wald, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 44, 403, 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.403 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cool horizons for entangled black holes
Maldacena, J., & Susskind, L. (2013) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201300020 · Cited by 1,304
Maximin surfaces, and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy
Wall, A. C. (2014) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/22/225007 · Cited by 545
Does back reaction enforce the averaged null energy condition in semiclassical gravity?
Flanagan, E. E., & Wald, R. M. (1996) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.6233 · Cited by 352
Averaged energy conditions and quantum inequalities
Ford, L. H., & Roman, T. A. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.4277 · Cited by 284
Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory
Kontou, E.-A., & Sanders, K. (2020) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab8fcf · Cited by 223
Curiel, E. (2017) · Einstein Studies · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3210-8_3 · Cited by 226
General relativistic energy conditions: The Hubble expansion in the epoch of galaxy formation
Visser, M. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.7578 · Cited by 184
Gravitational vacuum polarization. I. Energy conditions in the Hartle-Hawking vacuum
Visser, M. (1996) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.5103 · Cited by 106
Gravitational vacuum polarization. IV. Energy conditions in the Unruh vacuum
Visser, M. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.936 · Cited by 107
The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem
Wall, A. C. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/16/165003 · Cited by 106
Holographic proof of the quantum null energy condition
Koeller, J., & Leichenauer, S. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.024026 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, J. L., Schleich, K., & Witt, D. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-09-06
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1486-1489
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review