Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; none of the 17 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Nothing really matters

Open access
Dibitetto, Giuseppe, Petri, Nicolò, Schillo, Marjorie·2020·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep08(2020)040
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We study non-perturbative instabilities of AdS spacetime in General Relativity with a cosmological constant in arbitrary dimensions. In this simple setup we explicitly construct a class of gravitational instantons generalizing Witten’s bubble of nothing. We calculate the corresponding Euclidean action and show that its change is finite. The expansion of these bubbles is described by a lower-dimensional de Sitter geometry within a non- compact foliation of the background spacetime. Moreover we discuss the existence of covariantly constant spinors as a possible topological obstruction for such decays to occur. This mechanism is further connected to the stability of supersymmetric vacua in string theory.

Checked 2026-11-13 · 1 reference not checked yet

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper constructs gravitational instantons generalizing Witten’s bubble of nothing in (D+1)-dimensional General Relativity with a cosmological constant, describing non-perturbative decay of constant-curvature vacua via expanding bubbles with dS_d × S^{D-d-1} surfaces. It computes finite Euclidean-action bounces, shows exponential suppression in the semiclassical regime, and discusses covariantly constant spinors as a topological obstruction that can stabilize the vacuum.

Key findings

  • The construction generalizes Witten’s 5d Kaluza-Klein bubble to (D+1)-dimensional vacua of the form (3.1), with consistency conditions \(L_{dS_d}=1\), \(L_{S^{D-d-1}}=L_{dS_d}\sqrt{(D-d-2)/(d-1)}\), \(d\ge2\), \(D=d+2\). The Euclidean black-hole metric (3.4) is smooth when \(\ell_{KK}^2=4(D-2)f(\rho_0)^2/(d-1)\) (3.6); for \(\Lambda\le0\) it is non-singular for \(\rho\in(\rho_0,+\infty)\), while \(\Lambda>0\) is excluded because the Euclidean geometry has no asymptotic region.
  • The bounce is finite. For zero curvature, \(\Delta S_E^{(\Lambda=0)}\) is given by (3.15); for \(D=4,d=3\) it reduces to Witten’s result \(\Delta S_E=\pi R^2/(4G_N^{(4)})\) (2.6), and scales as \(\Delta S_E^{(\Lambda=0)}\propto (R/\ell_{Pl})^{D-1}\) (3.17). For \(\Lambda<0\), \(\Delta S_E^{(\Lambda<0)}\) is given by (3.18), with scaling (3.19); the decay rate is exponentially suppressed whenever the semiclassical approximation is valid.
  • The decay changes topology: the vacuum is foliated by \(S^1\times S^{d-1}\times S^{D-d-1}\), while near the bubble the instanton has topology \(R^2\times S^{d-1}\times S^{D-d-1}\). Covariantly constant spinors require \(\alpha=0\), whereas the unique spin structures on spheres require \(\alpha=\pi\); hence the instanton does not contribute to the path integral for theories with covariantly constant spinors, so suitable fermion boundary conditions can “cure” the instability.
  • Appendix B shows the bubble decay can be captured by a tunneling scalar field in one lower dimension via Kaluza-Klein reduction.

Methods

  • Theoretical construction: double analytic continuation of non-extremal black holes in (D+1)-dimensional GR with \(\Lambda\), using Wick rotation and continuing \(S^d\to dS^d\) to obtain the instanton geometry (3.7). The Hamilton-Jacobi formulation is used to recast the coupled second-order equations into first-order conditions without supersymmetry.
  • Euclidean action analysis: computes \(S_E=S_{E,\text{bulk}}+S_{E,\text{GHY}}\) and the bounce \(\Delta S_E=S_E|_{\text{inst}}-S_E|_{\text{false}}\), evaluating bulk and boundary contributions separately for zero and non-zero curvature.
  • No empirical data or sample; the work is an analytic study in arbitrary dimensions, with smoothness and consistency conditions imposed on the solutions.

Limitations

  • Stated: the semiclassical approximation is trusted only for \(R\) large compared to the Planck length \(\ell_{Pl}\). For \(\Lambda>0\), the Euclidean geometry does not have an asymptotic region due to a zero in \(f(\rho)\) and the static patch, so the paper specializes to \(\Lambda\le0\).
  • Stated: the interpretation of asymptotically AdS decay in holography remains an open problem; it is unknown how to interpret the decay in the dual field theory or whether the decay invalidates the holographic correspondence.
  • Text-evident: no explicit string-theory embedding or dual field theory computation is performed; extension to fully stringy decays is left for future work, and the analysis is classical/Euclidean rather than a full quantum-gravity treatment.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep08(2020)040

Cites

63 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 5 Not valid · 13 Not checked · 69 Own results and interpretations

62 more claims

Create a free account to see all 87 claims and to verify the 3 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dibitetto, G., Petri, N., & Schillo, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Schillo, Marjorie
ORCID
Petri, Nicolò
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-08-10
Volume
2020
Issue
8
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/jhep08(2020)040
OpenAlex
W3004464755
Semantic Scholar
2e3d43a3fc01c8c44f995b86aae64c8862c3ed0f
Cited by
45
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (116F137)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
AdS spacetime, gravitational instantons, bubble of nothing, Euclidean action, de Sitter geometry, topological obstructions, supersymmetric vacua, string theory, cosmological constant, higher-dimensional gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.