Cited by 595Relativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Instability of the Kaluza-Klein vacuum

Witten, Edward·1982·Nuclear Physics B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(82)90007-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the neutrino vacuum requires a non-trivial spin structure of the fermion, it does not decay by Witten's bubble of nothing.

    “Note that, since this vacuum requires a non-trivial spin structure of the fermion, it does not decay by the Witten's bubble of nothing [45].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Witten, E.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Witten, Edward
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-02
Volume
195
Issue
3
Pages
481-492
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977481574
Cited by
595
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
24.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
Kaluza-Klein theory, vacuum instability, counterexample, manifolds, elementary fermions, unified theory, ground state stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review