Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

K + → π + ν ν ¯ $$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$ and K L → π 0 ν ν ¯ $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ in the Standard Model: status and perspectives

Open access
Buras, Andrzej J., Buttazzo, Dario, Girrbach-Noe, Jennifer, Knegjens, Robert·2015·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

In view of the recent start of the NA62 experiment at CERN that is expected to measure the $$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$ branching ratio with a precision of 10%, we summarise the present status of this promising decay within the Standard Model (SM). We do likewise for the closely related $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ , which will be measured by the KOTO experiment around 2020. As the perturbative QCD and electroweak corrections in both decays are under full control, the dominant uncertainties within the SM presently originate from the CKM parameters |V cb |, |V ub | and γ. We show this dependence with the help of analytic expressions as well as accurate interpolating formulae. Unfortunately a clarification of the discrepancies between inclusive and exclusive determinations of |V cb | and |V ub | from tree-level decays will likely require results from the Belle II experiment available at the end of this decade. Thus we investigate whether higher precision on both branching ratios is achievable by determining |V cb |, |V ub | and γ by means of other observables that are already precisely measured. In this context ε K and ΔM s,d , together with the expected progress in QCD lattice calculations will play a prominent role. We find $$ \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu}\right)=\left(9.11 \pm 0.72\right) \times 1{0}^{-11} $$ and $$ \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu}\right)\Big) = \left(3.00 \pm 0.30\right) \times 1{0}^{-11} $$ , which is more precise than using averages of the present tree-level values of |V cb |, |V ub | and γ. Furthermore, we point out the correlation between $$ \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu}\right),\ \overline{\mathrm{\mathcal{B}}}\left({B}_{\mathrm{s}}\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right) $$ and γ within the SM, that is only very weakly dependent on other CKM parameters. Finally, we update the correlation of $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ with the ratio ε′ /ε in the SM taking the recent progress on ε′ /ε from lattice QCD and the large N approach into account.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep11(2015)033

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Metadata

Authors
Buras, A. J., Buttazzo, D., Girrbach-Noe, J., & Knegjens, R.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2015-11
Volume
2015
Issue
11
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1600232395
Cited by
271
References
14
FWCI
15.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: K + → π + ν ν ¯ $$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$ and K L → π 0 ν ν ¯ $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ in the Standard Model: status and perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep11(2015)033
The paper
Buras, A. J., Buttazzo, D., Girrbach-Noe, J., & Knegjens, R. (2015). K + → π + ν ν ¯ $$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$ and K L → π 0 ν ν ¯ $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ in the Standard Model: status and perspectives. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep11(2015)033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.