The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
K + → π + ν ν ¯ $$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$ and K L → π 0 ν ν ¯ $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ in the Standard Model: status and perspectives
Open accessAbstract
In view of the recent start of the NA62 experiment at CERN that is expected to measure the $$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$ branching ratio with a precision of 10%, we summarise the present status of this promising decay within the Standard Model (SM). We do likewise for the closely related $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ , which will be measured by the KOTO experiment around 2020. As the perturbative QCD and electroweak corrections in both decays are under full control, the dominant uncertainties within the SM presently originate from the CKM parameters |V cb |, |V ub | and γ. We show this dependence with the help of analytic expressions as well as accurate interpolating formulae. Unfortunately a clarification of the discrepancies between inclusive and exclusive determinations of |V cb | and |V ub | from tree-level decays will likely require results from the Belle II experiment available at the end of this decade. Thus we investigate whether higher precision on both branching ratios is achievable by determining |V cb |, |V ub | and γ by means of other observables that are already precisely measured. In this context ε K and ΔM s,d , together with the expected progress in QCD lattice calculations will play a prominent role. We find $$ \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu}\right)=\left(9.11 \pm 0.72\right) \times 1{0}^{-11} $$ and $$ \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu}\right)\Big) = \left(3.00 \pm 0.30\right) \times 1{0}^{-11} $$ , which is more precise than using averages of the present tree-level values of |V cb |, |V ub | and γ. Furthermore, we point out the correlation between $$ \mathrm{\mathcal{B}}\left({K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu}\right),\ \overline{\mathrm{\mathcal{B}}}\left({B}_{\mathrm{s}}\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right) $$ and γ within the SM, that is only very weakly dependent on other CKM parameters. Finally, we update the correlation of $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ with the ratio ε′ /ε in the SM taking the recent progress on ε′ /ε from lattice QCD and the large N approach into account.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beringer, J., Arguin, J. F., Barnett, R. M., Copic, K., Dahl, O., Groom, D. E., Lin, C. J., Lys, J., Murayama, H., Wohl, C. G., et al. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.010001 · Cited by 5,978
Minimal flavour violation: an effective field theory approach
D'Ambrosio, G., Giudice, G. F., Isidori, G., & Strumia, A. (2002) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00836-2 · Cited by 1,413
Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson
Buttazzo, D., Degrassi, G., Giardino, P. P., Giudice, G. F., Sala, F., Salvio, A., & Strumia, A. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2013)089 · Cited by 1,095
Self-citationReview of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics
FLAG Working Group, Aoki, S., Aoki, Y., Bernard, C., Blum, T., Colangelo, G., Della Morte, M., Dürr, S., El-Khadra, A. X., Fukaya, H., et al. (2014) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2890-7 · Cited by 763
A, A. J. B., Matthias Jamin, A., & Weisz, P. H. (1990) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90373-l · Cited by 596
Observation of the rare Bs0 →µ+µ− decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data
Khachatryan, V., Sirunyan, A. M., Tumasyan, A., Adam, W., Bergauer, T., Dragicevic, M., Erö, J., Friedl, M., Frühwirth, R., Ghete, V. M., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14474 · Cited by 507
Kaon decays in the standard model
Cirigliano, V., Ecker, G., Neufeld, H., Pich, A., & Portolés, J. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.399 · Cited by 328
BAT – The Bayesian analysis toolkit
Caldwell, A., Kollár, D., & Kröninger, K. (2009) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.026 · Cited by 276
Flavor physics in the Randall-Sundrum model: II. Tree-level weak-interaction processes
Bauer, M., Casagrande, S., Haisch, U., & Matthias Neubert, A. (2010) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2010)017 · Cited by 202
The rare decays beyond leading logarithms
Gerhard Buchalla, B., & A, A. J. B. (1994) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90496-0 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Buras, A. J., Buttazzo, D., Girrbach-Noe, J., & Knegjens, R.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1600232395
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: K + → π + ν ν ¯ $$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$ and K L → π 0 ν ν ¯ $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ in the Standard Model: status and perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep11(2015)033
- The paper
- Buras, A. J., Buttazzo, D., Girrbach-Noe, J., & Knegjens, R. (2015). K + → π + ν ν ¯ $$ {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} $$ and K L → π 0 ν ν ¯ $$ {K}_L\to {\pi}^0\nu \overline{\nu} $$ in the Standard Model: status and perspectives. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep11(2015)033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.