The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective Evaluation of Selective Defunctioning Stoma for Low Anterior Resection with Total Mesorectal Excision
Abstract
Abstract.: Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma is associated with a high anastomotic leakage rate, and the effectiveness of a defunctioning stoma in preventing anastomotic leakage remains controversial. In this study a policy of selective defunctioning stoma for stapled colorectal anastomosis after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision in 148 consecutive patients was evaluated prospectively. A defunctioning stoma was performed in 61 patients (41%) considered at high risk of anastomotic leakage. Clinical leakage occurred in 2 patients (3.3%) with a stoma and 11 patients (12.6%) without a stoma (p= 0.047). Among those without a stoma, the leakage rate among male patients (20.9%) was significantly higher than that for female patients (4.5%) (p= 0.022). Leakage subsided with conservative treatment in the two patients with a stoma, but seven patients without a stoma developed peritonitis requiring laparotomy. No deaths resulted from leakage, and there was one hospital death (0.6%) in the whole group. Median hospital stay was similar with and without a stoma (13.0 vs. 12.0 days) (p= 0.290). Closure of the stoma was associated with no mortality, a morbidity rate of 8.7%, and a median hospital stay of 6.0 days. In conclusion, a defunctioning stoma is effective in preventing clinical anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. The relatively high incidence of leakage in the low risk group indicates the difficulty of predicting anastomotic leakage and hence the need for more liberal use of a defunctioning stoma especially in male patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Rutegård, J., Simert, G., & Sjödahl, R. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3180603024 · Cited by 1,123
Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer
Peeters, K. C. M. J., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Marijnen, C. A. M., Klein Kranenbarg, E., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J., & van de Velde, C. J. H. (2005) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4806 · Cited by 659
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Defunctioning Stoma in Low Rectal Cancer Surgery
Hüser, N., Michalski, C. W., Erkan, M., Schuster, T., Rosenberg, R., Kleeff, J., & Friess, H. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318176bf65 · Cited by 616
Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Tan, W. S., Tang, C. L., Shi, L., & Eu, K. W. (2009) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6594 · Cited by 478
Trencheva, K., Morrissey, K. P., Wells, M., Mancuso, C. A., Lee, S. W., Sonoda, T., Michelassi, F., Charlson, M. E., & Milsom, J. W. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318262a6cd · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Poon, R. T., Chu, K., Ho, J. W., Chan, C., Law, W., & Wong, J.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 463-468
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W2092682912
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Evaluation of Selective Defunctioning Stoma for Low Anterior Resection with Total Mesorectal Excision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/pl00012331
- The paper
- Poon, R. T., Chu, K., Ho, J. W., Chan, C., Law, W., & Wong, J. (1999). Prospective Evaluation of Selective Defunctioning Stoma for Low Anterior Resection with Total Mesorectal Excision. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00012331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.