The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Defunctioning Stoma in Low Rectal Cancer Surgery
Abstract
In Brief Summary Background Data: The role of a defunctioning stoma in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer is still the subject of controversy. Recent studies suggest reduced morbidity after low anterior rectal resection with a defunctioning stoma. Methods: Retrospective and prospective studies published between 1966 and 2007 were systematically reviewed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anterior resections with or without defunctioning stoma were included in a meta-analysis. The pooled estimates of clinically relevant anastomotic leakages and of reoperations were analyzed using a random effects model (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval, CI). Results: Relevant retrospective single (n = 18) and multicenter (n = 9) studies were identified and included in the systematic review. Analysis of incoherent data of the leakage rates in these nonrandomized studies demonstrated that a defunctioning stoma did not influence the occurrence of anastomotic failure but seemed to ameliorate the consequences of the leak. Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio for clinically relevant anastomotic leakage was 0.32 (95% CI 0.17–0.59), revealing a statistically significant benefit conferred through a defunctioning stoma (Z = 3.65, P = 0.0003). The odds ratio for reoperation because of leakage-caused complications was 0.27 (95% CI 0.14–0.51), with significantly fewer reoperations in patients with a defunctioning stoma (Z = 3.95, P < 0.0001). Overall mortality rates were comparable regardless of the presence of a defunctioning stoma. Conclusion: A defunctioning stoma reduces the rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakages and is thus recommended in surgery for low rectal cancers. In this study, a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery were performed, revealing that a stoma reduces the rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakages. Furthermore, overall mortality rates were comparable. Thus, creation of a defunctioning stoma is recommended in surgery for low rectal cancers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
Sauer, R., Becker, H., Hohenberger, W., Rödel, C., Wittekind, C., Fietkau, R., Martus, P., Tschmelitsch, J., Hager, E., Hess, C. F., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040694 · Cited by 6,050
Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal Cancer
Kapiteijn, E., Marijnen, C. A. M., Nagtegaal, I. D., Putter, H., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J. T., Pahlman, L., Glimelius, B., van Krieken, J. H. J. M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010580 · Cited by 4,205
RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCER
Heald, R. J., & Ryall, R. D. H. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91510-2 · Cited by 2,710
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Rutegård, J., Simert, G., & Sjödahl, R. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3180603024 · Cited by 1,123
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer
Rullier, E., Laurent, C., Garrelon, J. L., Michel, P., Saric, J., & Parneix, M. (1998) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x · Cited by 895
(1995) · PubMed · Cited by 759
Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer
Peeters, K. C. M. J., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Marijnen, C. A. M., Klein Kranenbarg, E., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J., & van de Velde, C. J. H. (2005) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4806 · Cited by 659
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Andersson, M., Rutegård, J., & Sjödahl, R. (2004) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x · Cited by 597
Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum
Karanjia, N. D., Corder, A. P., Bearn, P., & Heald, R. J. (1994) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800810850 · Cited by 574
Cited by
Kang, S.-B., Park, J. W., Jeong, S.-Y., Nam, B. H., Choi, H. S., Kim, D.-W., Lim, S.-B., Lee, T.-G., Kim, D. Y., Kim, J.-S., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5 · Cited by 1,019
Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Tan, W. S., Tang, C. L., Shi, L., & Eu, K. W. (2009) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6594 · Cited by 478
Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma
Montedori, A., Cirocchi, R., Farinella, E., Sciannameo, F., & Abraha, I. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006878.pub2 · Cited by 246
Zhang, H., Li, S., Jin, X., Wu, X., Zhang, Z., Shen, L., Wan, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, W., et al. (2022) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-022-02031-4 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Hüser, N., Michalski, C. W., Erkan, M., Schuster, T., Rosenberg, R., Kleeff, J., & Friess, H.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-60
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090473586
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Defunctioning Stoma in Low Rectal Cancer Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e318176bf65
- The paper
- Hüser, N., Michalski, C. W., Erkan, M., Schuster, T., Rosenberg, R., Kleeff, J., & Friess, H. (2008). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Defunctioning Stoma in Low Rectal Cancer Surgery. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318176bf65
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.