The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical regions: A model-based estimation of world water resources sensitive to global changes
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. This paper presents a top-down approach for identifying regions whose water resources have higher sensitivity to global change than other regions. The aim of this approach is to provide an overview of regions that may justify special attention from the research and development assistance community, under particular global change scenarios. As a 'top-down' method it is best seen as a type of sensitivity analysis that can complement rather than replace other 'bottom-up' studies of the vulnerability of particular watersheds. An increase in 'water stress' is used as a measure of increasing sensitivity of watersheds to global change, and this stress is computed with the global water model, WaterGAP. Stress increases when either water withdrawals increase or water availability decreases. Since the criteria for determining critical regions is uncertain, they are calculated and compared for four different sets of criteria. To examine the difference in critical regions under different socio-economic and climate scenarios, they were also calculated for four distinctive scenarios. Under the scenario showing the largest increase in water stresses, the estimated area of critical regions (in 2032) ranges from 7.4 to 13.0 percent of total land area, depending on the criteria for identifying critical regions. As expected, the estimate of critical regions is very scenario-dependent, showing smaller areas under scenarios having smaller increases in water stress. However, some regions always appear as critical regions regardless of the scenario. These include parts of central Mexico, the Middle East, large parts of the Indian sub-continent, and stretches of the North African coast.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Four billion people facing severe water scarcity
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500323 · Cited by 5,531
Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability
ALCAMO, J., DÖLL, P., HENRICHS, T., KASPAR, F., LEHNER, B., RÖSCH, T., & SIEBERT, S. (2003) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1623/hysj.48.3.317.45290 · Cited by 877
Self-citationClimate and environmental change in arid Central Asia: Impacts, vulnerability, and adaptations
Lioubimtseva, E., & Henebry, G. M. (2009) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.04.022 · Cited by 734
Climate Change, Natural Disasters, and Migration—a Survey of the Empirical Evidence
Berlemann, M., & Steinhardt, M. F. (2017) · CESifo Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifx019 · Cited by 332
Assessing Transformation Pathways
(2015) · Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415416.012 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Alcamo, J., & Henrichs, T.
- Venue
- Aquatic Sciences
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 352-362
- ISSN
- 1015-1621 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092375619
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical regions: A model-based estimation of world water resources sensitive to global changes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/pl00012591
- The paper
- Alcamo, J., & Henrichs, T. (2002). Critical regions: A model-based estimation of world water resources sensitive to global changes. Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00012591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.