Animal feeding studies for nutritional and safety assessments of feeds from genetically modified plants: A review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Globally, food-producing animals consume 70 to 90% of genetically engineered crop biomass.
“Globally, food-producing animals consume 70 to 90% of genetically engineered (GE) crop biomass.”
From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Flachowsky et al., 2012
Numerous experimental studies have consistently revealed that the performance and health of GE-fed animals are comparable with those fed isogenic non-GE crop lines.
“Numerous experimental studies have consistently revealed that the performance and health of GE-fed animals are comparable with those fed isogenic non-GE crop lines.”
From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Flachowsky et al., 2012
No significant differences in feed digestibility, performance, or health have been observed in livestock that consume GE feed.
“no significant differences in feed digestibility, performance, or health have been observed in livestock that consume GE feed (Flachowsky et al., 2012).”
From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Flachowsky et al., 2012
Multiple generations of food animals have been consuming 70 to 90% of harvested GE biomass for more than 15 years.
“Multiple generations of food animals have been consuming 70 to 90% of harvested GE biomass (Flachowsky et al., 2012) for more than 15 yr.”
From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Flachowsky et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Flachowsky, G., Schafft, H., & Meyer, U.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (DE)
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Flachowsky, Gerhard
- ORCID
- Meyer, Ulrich
- Venue
- Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit
- Published
- 2012-07-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 179-194
- ISSN
- 1661-5751 (ISSN-L)
- 1661-5867
- OpenAlex
- W2016146358
- Semantic Scholar
- 52547d728a0264b7529f14096c6083bd3536ff44
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (publishedVersion)
- OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Keywords
- transgenic plants, animal feeding studies, nutritional assessment, food safety assessment, novel proteins, compositional analysis, in vitro studies, arable land use, plant biotechnology, public acceptance, experimental design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
