Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1
Abstract
Globally, food-producing animals consume 70 to 90% of genetically engineered (GE) crop biomass. This review briefly summarizes the scientific literature on performance and health of animals consuming feed containing GE ingredients and composition of products derived from them. It also discusses the field experience of feeding GE feed sources to commercial livestock populations and summarizes the suppliers of GE and non-GE animal feed in global trade. Numerous experimental studies have consistently revealed that the performance and health of GE-fed animals are comparable with those fed isogenic non-GE crop lines. United States animal agriculture produces over 9 billion food-producing animals annually, and more than 95% of these animals consume feed containing GE ingredients. Data on livestock productivity and health were collated from publicly available sources from 1983, before the introduction of GE crops in 1996, and subsequently through 2011, a period with high levels of predominately GE animal feed. These field data sets, representing over 100 billion animals following the introduction of GE crops, did not reveal unfavorable or perturbed trends in livestock health and productivity. No study has revealed any differences in the nutritional profile of animal products derived from GE-fed animals. Because DNA and protein are normal components of the diet that are digested, there are no detectable or reliably quantifiable traces of GE components in milk, meat, and eggs following consumption of GE feed. Globally, countries that are cultivating GE corn and soy are the major livestock feed exporters. Asynchronous regulatory approvals (i.e., cultivation approvals of GE varieties in exporting countries occurring before food and feed approvals in importing countries) have resulted in trade disruptions. This is likely to be increasingly problematic in the future as there are a large number of "second generation" GE crops with altered output traits for improved livestock feed in the developmental and regulatory pipelines. Additionally, advanced techniques to affect targeted genome modifications are emerging, and it is not clear whether these will be encompassed by the current GE process-based trigger for regulatory oversight. There is a pressing need for international harmonization of both regulatory frameworks for GE crops and governance of advanced breeding techniques to prevent widespread disruptions in international trade of livestock feedstuffs in the future.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review concludes that GE feedstuffs are compositionally equivalent to conventional feed and that livestock performance, health, and animal-product composition are comparable between GE-fed and non-GE-fed animals, based on feeding studies and field data from over 100 billion U.S. animals (2000–2011). It also warns that asynchronous regulatory approvals and zero-tolerance policies are causing trade disruptions and will become more problematic with second-generation GE crops and gene editing.
Key findings
- Experimental feeding studies consistently show performance and health of GE-fed animals comparable to those fed near-isogenic non-GE lines; no study has revealed differences in the nutritional profile of milk, meat, or eggs, and neither recombinant DNA nor intact recombinant protein has been detected in animal products.
- U.S. field data from 1983–2011, including over 100 billion animals after GE crop introduction, showed no unfavorable or perturbed trends in livestock health and productivity; available health indicators improved over time (e.g., dairy somatic cell count fell from 304,000 cells/mL in 1995 to 217,000 in 2011; broiler feed-to-gain fell from 2 in 1985 to 1.91 in 2011; cattle and poultry condemnation/mortality rates decreased).
- GE feed dominates global trade: an estimated 92.75–95.9% of traded soybeans, 64–92.7% of traded corn, 69% of cotton, and 84.2–85% of canola may contain GE material; non-GE-fed animal products are a niche market (<5% of U.S. animals), with organic livestock shares such as 0.33% of broilers, 1.97% of layers, 0.20% of turkeys, 0.34% of beef cows, 2.78% of dairy cows, and 0.01% of hogs in 2011.
- Asynchronous approvals caused trade disruptions, including China’s rejection of U.S. corn: 3.3 million t were subject to rejection and diverted shipments (1.4 million t) or canceled/deferred sales, with estimated losses up to $2.9 billion; GE crops added an estimated 122 and 230 million t to global soybean and corn production, reduced pesticide spraying by 499 million kg (−8.7%), and lowered environmental impact by 18.1%.
Methods
- Design: narrative review of peer-reviewed livestock GE feeding studies and animal-product composition studies, plus analysis of publicly available U.S. livestock productivity and health data from 1983 through 2011, comparing pre-GE (1983–1994) and high-GE-feed (2000–2011) periods.
- Data: broiler, dairy, hog, and beef industries; sources included USDA Economics, Statistics, and Market Information System, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA FSIS, National Chicken Council, and published audits; global production/trade data came from USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, FAO, Brookes and Barfoot, and others.
- Analysis: regression analyses were performed for 1983–1994 and 2000–2011, and slopes between periods were compared using an unpaired t test where data were available; feeding-study and trade data were summarized descriptively.
Limitations
- Paper-stated: whole-food animal feeding trials have low power to detect adverse effects, are limited by how much GE feed can be included without nutritional imbalance, and contribute little to safety assessment once compositional equivalence is established; fewer than 100 long-term (>90 d) and multigenerational target-animal GE feeding studies exist in the peer-reviewed literature.
- Paper-stated: long-term and multigenerational studies should be reserved for cases where reasonable doubt remains after a 90-d feeding trial triggered by a potential hazard, and statistically significant differences in such studies are not necessarily adverse effects.
- Evident from the text: the field analysis is observational, relies on aggregated publicly available data and regression slope comparisons, and cannot establish causality or individual-level exposure; the review is described as brief/narrative rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 137 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given§ Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations 1 · p. 1
More than 95% of United States food-producing animals consume feed containing GE ingredients.
“and more than 95% of these animals consume feed containing GE ingredients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations 1 · p. 1
Field data sets representing over 100 billion animals following the introduction of GE crops did not reveal unfavorable or perturbed trends in livestock health and productivity.
“These field data sets, representing over 100 billion animals following the introduction of GE crops, did not reveal unfavorable or perturbed trends in livestock health and productivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11
79% (85 million ha) of global soybean hectarage is planted to GE varieties.
“It is estimated that 79% (85 million ha) of global soybean hectarage is planted to GE varieties (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 3
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 5
During 2011, less than 5% of United States animals within each of the major livestock sectors were raised for certified National Organic Program markets that specifically prohibit the feeding of GE feed.
“During 2011, less than 5% of U.S. animals within each of the major livestock sectors were raised for certified National Organic Program ( NOP ) markets that specifically prohibit the feeding of GE feed (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11
32% (57 million ha) of global corn hectarage is planted with GE varieties.
“Although only 32% (57 million ha) of global corn hectarage is planted with GE varieties (Fig. 3), 71% of global trade came from those countries that grow GE corn varieties (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 3
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11
97% of global soybean exports came from 3 countries that grow GE soybeans-the United States, Brazil, and Argentina.
“In 2013, 36.5% of global soybean production (97.2 million t) was exported and 97% came from 3 countries that grow GE soybeans-the United States, Brazil, and Argentina (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 4
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11
In 2013, 36.5% of global soybean production (97.2 million t) was exported.
“In 2013, 36.5% of global soybean production (97.2 million t) was exported and 97% came from 3 countries that grow GE soybeans-the United States, Brazil, and Argentina (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 4
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11
Soybean meal supplies 46% of the lysine supply overall in EU animal feeds.
“Soybean meal is a very important protein source for animal feeds in the EU, supplying 46% of the lysine supply overall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7
In all industries, there were no obvious perturbations in production parameters over time.
“In all industries, there were no obvious perturbations in production parameters over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7
Of the more than 163 million cattle arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities for the years 2003 through 2007, a total of 769,339 (0.47%) were condemned.
“Of the more than 163 million cattle arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities for the years 2003 through 2007, a total of 769,339 (0.47%) were condemned (White and Moore, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites White and Moore, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
- Rests on an assumption: Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
- Findingcitation§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7
The conversion of feed to gain continuously decreased from 2 in 1985 to 1.91 in 2011.
“The conversion of feed to gain continuously decreased from 2 in 1985 to 1.91 in 2011”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 5
Cumulatively, over 100 billion animals consumed some level of GE feed between 2000 and 2011.
“Cumulatively, this amounts to over 100 billion animals consuming some level of GE feed between 2000 and 2011 (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13
88% of globally traded soybean meal likely contains GE material.
“A similar pattern occurs in soybean meal, where 88% of globally traded meal likely contains GE material (Table 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 7
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14
In 2014, the German poultry industry, which feeds 0.8 million t of soybean meal annually, abandoned its commitment to use only non-GE soybeans in poultry feed.
“Likewise, in 2014, the German poultry industry, which feeds 0.8 million t of soybean meal annually, abandoned its commitment to use only non-GE soybeans in poultry feed (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2014c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2014c
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13
The United States is no longer a major supplier of corn to the EU.
“The result is that the United States is no longer a major supplier of corn to the EU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ Dairy · p. 16
Organic milk led livestock commodities, accounting for $765 million, or 58%, of organic animal product sales.
“Organic milk led livestock commodities, accounting for $765 million, or 58%, of organic animal product sales; however, less than 2% of U.S. dairy production is currently organic (Hafla et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13
Of the top 5 soybean meal importing countries in 2013-the EU, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Iran-none grow GE soybeans.
“Of the top 5 soybean meal importing countries in 2013-the EU, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Iran-none grow GE soybeans (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2014a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2014a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13
Between 4.0 and 4.5% of global trade in soybeans is required to be identity-preserved certified non-GE.
“It is estimated that between 4.0 and 4.5% of global trade in soybeans is required to be identity-preserved certified non-GE, and if it is as -sumed that this volume of traded soybeans is segregated from supplies that may contain GE soybeans, then the GE share of global trade is in the range of 93 to 96% (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 6
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15
The costs of certified organic feedstuffs are 2 to 3 times greater than non-organically grown feeds.
“The costs of certified organic feedstuffs are 2 to 3 times greater than non-organicallygrown feeds (Hafla et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hafla et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11
71% of global corn trade came from countries that grow GE corn varieties.
“Although only 32% (57 million ha) of global corn hectarage is planted with GE varieties (Fig. 3), 71% of global trade came from those countries that grow GE corn varieties (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 6
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Poultry · p. 17
Globally traded non-GE soybean meal is roughly at a 13% premium to conventional soybean meal prices.
“The prices received by U.S. non-GE corn and soybean producers in recent years have averaged 15% more than the prices received by conventional commodity producers (CAST, 2014), and globally traded non-GE soybean meal is roughly at a 13% premium to conventional soybean meal prices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Poultry · p. 17
The prices received by U.S. non-GE corn and soybean producers in recent years have averaged 15% more than the prices received by conventional commodity producers.
“The prices received by U.S. non-GE corn and soybean producers in recent years have averaged 15% more than the prices received by conventional commodity producers (CAST, 2014), and globally traded non-GE soybean meal is roughly at a 13% premium to conventional soybean meal prices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CAST, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 18
During 1996 through 2012, cumulative economic benefits from cost savings and added income derived from planting GE crops was $58.15 billion in developing countries and $58.45 billion in industrial countries.
“During the period 1996 through 2012, it has been estimated that the cumulative economic benefits from cost savings and added income derived from planting GE crops was $58.15 billion in developing countries and $58.45 billion in industrial countries (Brookes and Barfoot, 2014a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brookes and Barfoot, 2014a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17
GE technology has added an estimated 122 and 230 million t to the global production of soybeans and corn, respectively, since the introduction of GE varieties in the mid 1990s.
“Despite the fact that the first generation of GE crops with so-called 'input' traits (those that potentially alter inputs needed in production) were not designed to increase crops yields per se, GE technology has added an estimated 122 and 230 million t to the global production of soybeans and corn, respectively, since the introduction of GE varieties in the mid 1990s (Brookes and Barfoot, 2014a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brookes and Barfoot, 2014a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17
The projected increase in livestock production will require annual feed consumption of cereals to rise by nearly 300 million t by 2020.
“The projected increase in livestock production will require annual feed consumption of cereals to rise by nearly 300 million t by 2020 (Delgado, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Delgado, 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Poultry · p. 17
Currently, the size of the market for products derived from animals raised in production systems that use either identity-preserved certified non-GE or organic feed is less than 5%.
“Currently, the size of the market for products derived from animals raised in production systems that use either identity-preserved certified non-GE or organic feed is less than 5% (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 7
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Beef · p. 16
In a survey of certified organic beef producers in the United States, 83% reported that cattle were raised exclusively or predominantly on grass and hay until slaughter, while the remaining 17% reported using a grain finishing system.
“In a survey of certified organic beef producers in the United States, 83% reported that cattle were raised exclusively or predominantly on grass and hay until slaughter, while the remaining 17% reported using a grain finishing system (Hafla et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hafla et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 20
The market for animals that have not consumed GE feed is currently a niche market in the United States.
“The market for animals that have not consumed GE feed is currently a niche market in the United States, although such products are available to interested consumers via voluntary processbased marketing programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ The Future · p. 18
There are considerable discrepancies in the amount of time required to review and approve new GE crops in different countries.
“There are considerable discrepancies in the amount of time required to review and approve new GE crops in different countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Conclusions · p. 20
An extensive search of peer-reviewed literature and field observations of animals fed diets containing GE crop products have revealed no unexpected perturbations or disturbing trends in animal performance or health indicators.
“An extensive search of peer-reviewed literature and field observations of animals fed diets containing GE crop products have revealed no unexpected perturbations or disturbing trends in animal performance or health indicators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Conclusions · p. 20
It is not possible to distinguish any differences in the nutritional profile of animal products following consumption of GE feed.
“Likewise, it is not possible to distinguish any differences in the nutritional profile of animal products following consumption of GE feed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 20
Animal agriculture is currently highly dependent on GE feed sources.
“Animal agriculture is currently highly dependent on GE feed sources, and global trade of livestock feed is largely supplied by countries that have approved the cultivation of GE crops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Conclusions · p. 20
Globally, billions of animals have been eating GE feed for almost 2 decades.
“Commercial livestock populations are the largest consumers of GE crops, and globally, billions of animals have been eating GE feed for almost 2 decades.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 2
Studies have been conducted with a variety of food-producing animals including sheep, goats, pigs, chickens, quail, cattle, water buffalo, rabbits, and fish fed different GE crop varieties.
“Studies have been conducted with a variety of food-producing animals including sheep, goats, pigs, chickens, quail, cattle, water buffalo, rabbits, and fish fed different GE crop varieties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3
Once compositional equivalence has been established for a GE crop, animal feeding studies add little to the safety assessment.
“Once compositional equivalence has been established for a GE crop, animal feeding studies add little to the safety assessment (Bartholomaeus et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bartholomaeus et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: GE proteins are digested in the gut and no intact GE protein has been found in the bloodstream.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3
Post hoc analysis of a large number of variables in a data set with a small sample size can lead to spurious conclusions.
“Post hoc analysis of a large number of variables in a data set with a small sample size can lead to spurious conclusions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DeFrancesco, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 2
Over the past 20 years, the United States Food and Drug Administration found all 148 GE transformation events it evaluated to be substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts.
“Over the past 20 yr, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found all of the 148 GE transformation events that they evaluated to be substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Herman and Price, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations 1 · p. 1
No study has revealed any differences in the nutritional profile of animal products derived from GE-fed animals.
“No study has revealed any differences in the nutritional profile of animal products derived from GE-fed animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Guertler et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tufarelli and Laudadio, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 1
It is not possible to detect differences in nutritional profiles of animal products after consumption of GE feed.
“Similarly, it is not possible to detect differences in nutritional profiles of ani -mal products after consumption of GE feed (Guertler et al., 2010; Tufarelli and Laudadio, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Guertler et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tufarelli and Laudadio, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3
There were statistically significant differences in some of the parameters measured in the two comprehensive studies.
“there were statistically significant differences in some of the parameters mea sured.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 1
Independent studies have shown the compositional equivalence of the current generation of GE crops.
“Independent studies have shown the compositional equivalence of the current generation of GE crops (Cheng et al., 2008; Garcia-Villalba et al., 2008; Herman and Price, 2013; Hollingworth et al., 2003)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations 1 · p. 1
Numerous experimental studies have consistently revealed that the performance and health of GE-fed animals are comparable with those fed isogenic non-GE crop lines.
“Numerous experimental studies have consistently revealed that the performance and health of GE-fed animals are comparable with those fed isogenic non-GE crop lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flachowsky et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 2
Multiple generations of food animals have been consuming 70 to 90% of harvested GE biomass for more than 15 years.
“Multiple generations of food animals have been consuming 70 to 90% of harvested GE biomass (Flachowsky et al., 2012) for more than 15 yr.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flachowsky et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations 1 · p. 1
Globally, food-producing animals consume 70 to 90% of genetically engineered crop biomass.
“Globally, food-producing animals consume 70 to 90% of genetically engineered (GE) crop biomass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flachowsky et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations 1 · p. 1
There are no detectable or reliably quantifiable traces of GE components in milk, meat, and eggs following consumption of GE feed.
“there are no detectable or reliably quantifiable traces of GE components in milk, meat, and eggs following consumption of GE feed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: DNA and protein are normal components of the diet and are digested.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 2
In 2013, the European Union adopted a regulation mandating a 90-day subchronic rodent feeding study for every single GE transformation event.
“In 2013, the European Union ( EU ) Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health (Brussels, Belgium) adopted a regulation mandating a 90-d subchronic rodent feeding study (OECD, 1998) for every single GE transformation event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 2
Japanese regulators found 189 submissions to be substantially equivalent to their conventional counterparts.
“as have Japanese regulators for 189 submissions (Herman and Price, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Herman and Price, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3
Organ pathology and function were similar between animals fed GE and non-GE corn.
“Organ pathology and function were similar between animals fed GE and nonGE corn”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 10
Given that there are no detectable and reliably quantifiable traces of GE materials in milk, meat, and eggs, any proposed labeling of animal products derived from GE-fed livestock would have to be based on documenting the absence of GE crops in the production chain.
“Given that there are no detectable and reliably quantifiable traces of GE materials in milk, meat, and eggs, any proposed labeling of animal products derived from GE-fed livestock would have to be based on documenting the absence of GE crops in the production chain, thereby necessitating the need for identity preservation and segregation requirements for producers and importers (Bertheau et al., 2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bertheau et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 8
The available health indicators from U.S. livestock suggest that these rates actually improved over time despite widespread adoption of GE crops in U.S. agriculture and increasing levels of GE content in livestock diets.
“The available health indicators from U.S. livestock suggest that these rates actually improved over time despite widespread adoption of GE crops in U.S. agriculture and increasing levels of GE content in livestock diets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
- Rests on an assumption: Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
- Premisecitation§ Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 10
Intact recombinant proteins have never been detected in tissues or products of animals fed GE crops.
“Intact recombinant proteins have never been detected in tissues or products of animals fed GE crops (Alexander et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alexander et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3
There are fewer than 100 long-term (>90 days) and multigenerational target animal GE feeding studies in the peer-reviewed literature.
“There are less than 100 long-term (>90 d) and multigenerational target animal GE feeding studies in the peerreviewed literature”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7
The decrease in feed conversion ratio is attributable most likely to improved genetics and management.
“attributable most likely to improved genetics (Havenstein et al., 2003) and management”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Havenstein et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 8
A small number of experimental animal feeding studies have generated highly controversial results suggesting deleterious health effects of GE feed.
“A small number of experimental animal feeding studies have generated highly controversial results suggesting deleterious health effects of GE feed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 9
Fragments of highly abundant plant DNA (e.g., chloroplast genomes) have been found in the digestive tracts and tissues of some species.
“Fragments of highly abundant plant DNA (e.g., chloroplast genomes) have been found in the digestive tracts and tissues of some species (Einspanier et al., 2001);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Einspanier et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 9
This result (transgenic DNA in milk) has not been repeated despite recent studies using more sophisticated techniques that have looked for the presence of transgenic material in animal products.
“This result has not been repeated despite recent studies using more sophisticated techniques that have looked for the presence of transgenic material in animal products (Buzoianu et al., 2012b; Deb et al., 2013; Guertler et al., 2010; Tufarelli and Laudadio, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Buzoianu et al., 2012b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Deb et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guertler et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 9
These controversial studies are contrary to the field experience as documented by the health and production data collected on the billions of commercial food-producing animals that have primarily been consuming GE feed for over a decade.
“They are also contrary to the field experience as documented by the health and production data collected on the billions of commercial food-producing animals that have primarily been consuming GE feed for over a decade.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
- Rests on an assumption: Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3
Objective analyses of available data indicate that, for a wide range of substances, reproductive and developmental effects observed in long-term studies are not potentially more sensitive endpoints than those examined in 90-day rodent subchronic toxicity tests.
“Objective analyses of available data indicate that, for a wide range of substances, reproductive and developmental effects observed in long-term studies are not potentially more sensitive endpoints than those examined in 90-d rodent subchronic toxicity tests (European Food Safety Authority, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites European Food Safety Authority, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3
There is no evidence that long-term and multigenerational feeding studies of the first generation of GE crops conducted to date have uncovered adverse effects that were undetected by short-term rodent feeding studies.
“There is no evidence that long-term and multigenerational feeding studies of the first generation of GE crops that have been conducted to date have uncovered adverse effects that were undetected by short-term rodent feeding studies (Snell et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Snell et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13
Assuming that the volume of traded soybeans required to be identity-preserved is segregated from supplies that may contain GE soybeans, the GE share of global trade is in the range of 93 to 96%.
“It is estimated that between 4.0 and 4.5% of global trade in soybeans is required to be identity-preserved certified non-GE, and if it is as -sumed that this volume of traded soybeans is segregated from supplies that may contain GE soybeans, then the GE share of global trade is in the range of 93 to 96% (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 6
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The volume of traded soybeans required to be identity-preserved certified non-GE is segregated from supplies that may contain GE soybeans.
- Interpretationcitation§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14
The German poultry industry's abandonment of non-GE soybeans was largely due to Brazil growing more GE soybeans and therefore having less identity-preserved certified non-GE soybeans available for export.
“This was largely due to the fact that Brazil is growing more GE soybeans and therefore has less identity-preserved certified non-GE soybeans available for export.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14
Reliance on imported animal feed is becoming increasingly complicated for countries that wish to source non-GE products due to the significant GE adoption rate worldwide.
“Reliance on imported animal feed is becoming increasingly complicated for countries that wish to source non-GE products due to the significant GE adoption rate worldwide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Dairy · p. 16
U.S. organic dairy systems depend on the willingness of consumers to pay a premium.
“The U.S. organic dairy systems depend on the willingness of consumers to pay a premium (Hafla et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hafla et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Poultry · p. 17
Given the importance of feed costs in overall animal production costs, the cost of animal products from animals fed non-GE feed would be more expensive.
“Given the importance of feed costs in overall animal production costs, the cost of animal products from animals fed non-GE feed would be more expensive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ The Future · p. 18
An additional concern is the increasing problem of asynchronous regulatory approval.
“An additional concern is the increasing problem of asynchronous regulatory approval, or regulatory asynchronicity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Poultry · p. 17
Mandating the labeling of products derived from animals that have eaten GE-feed at the current time would result in labeling essentially all products derived from conventionally raised livestock (i.e., >95% of all animal products) in the United States.
“Mandating the labeling of products derived from animals that have eaten GE-feed at the current time would result in labeling essentially all products derived from conventionally raised livestock (i.e., >95% of all animal products) in the United States.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Poultry · p. 17
If suppliers and marketers respond to mandatory labeling of products from animals fed GE feed by increasing the offering of products from animals fed non-GE feed, an increase in the non-GE feed supply would be required.
“If suppliers and marketers respond to mandatory labeling of products from animals fed GE feed by increasing the offering of products from animals fed non-GE feed, an increase in the non-GE feed supply would be required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ The Future · p. 20
Some gene-editing techniques generate genetic changes that cannot be distinguished from conventionally bred crops or from crops produced by natural genetic variation or unregulated radiation mutagenesis.
“Likewise, some gene-editing techniques generate genetic changes that cannot be distinguished from conventionally bred crops or from crops produced by natural genetic variation or unregulated radiation mutagenesis (Broeders et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Broeders et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ The Future · p. 18
Under a zero-tolerance policy, trade of relevant commodities between asynchronous countries will likely cease as importing and exporting firms will act to avoid the risk associated with a positive test.
“Under a zero-tolerance policy, trade of relevant commodities between asynchronous countries will likely cease as importing and exporting firms will act to avoid the risk associated with a positive test (Kalaitzandonakes et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kalaitzandonakes et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 20
Supplying non-GE-fed animal products is likely to become increasingly expensive given the expanding global planting of GE crops and the growing number of countries that raise them.
“Supplying non-GE-fed animal products is likely to become increasingly expensive given the expanding global planting of GE crops and the growing number of countries that raise them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ The Future · p. 20
PCR-based screening methodology may be unable to detect the genetic modifications that are under development through precise breeding techniques.
“Furthermore, PCR-based screening methodology may be unable to detect the genetic modifications that are under development through precise breeding techniques (Lusser et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lusser et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ The Future · p. 18
This leads to a situation where GE crops may be cultivated and marketed in some countries and remain unapproved in others.
“This leads to a situation where GE crops may be cultivated and marketed in some countries and remain unapproved in others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The Future · p. 20
As new GE crops with multiple novel regulatory and coding region sequences are developed, it will be increasingly difficult to use PCR-based assays to detect all possible events.
“As new GE crops with multiple novel regulatory and coding region sequences are developed, it will be increasingly difficult to use PCRbased assays to detect all possible events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The Future · p. 19
Trade disruptions in livestock feedstuffs appear imminent, especially in countries that have slow approval processes for GE imports and are heavily dependent on commodity imports from exporting countries that are cultivating and developing a large number of GE crop varieties.
“Given the scope of trade of livestock feedstuffs and the increasing importance of GE crops in this supply, trade disruptions appear imminent, especially in countries that have slow approval processes for GE imports and yet are heavily dependent on commodity imports from exporting countries that are cultivating and developing a large number of GE crop varieties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 92
- May combine two claims. 76
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations 1 · p. 1United States animal agriculture produces over 9 billion food-producing animals annually.
“United States animal agriculture produces over 9 billion foodproducing animals annually”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingreasoning§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7An estimated 24 consecutive generations of broilers would have been consuming GE feed during the time period 2000 to 2011.
“An estimated 24 consecutive generations of broilers would have been consuming GE feed during the time period 2000 to 2011.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In a typical U.S. broiler operation, chickens are fed for 42–49 d on diets composed of approximately 35% soybean meal and 65% corn grain.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 8There was no indication of worsening animal health after the introduction of GE feed, and productivity improvements continued in the same direction and at similar rates as those observed before the introduction of GE crop varieties in 1996.
“There was no indication of worsening animal health after the introduction of GE feed, and productivity improvements continued in the same direction and at similar rates as those that were observed before the introduction of GE crop varieties in 1996.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
- Rests on an assumption: Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7Broiler mortality was essentially unchanged throughout the years presented and was also at its lowest in 2011.
“Moreover, mortality was essentially unchanged throughout the years presented and was also at its lowest in 2011.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11The EU imports 65% of its protein-rich feedstuffs, for which there are no alternative sources grown in the EU.
“The EU imports 65% of its protein-rich feedstuffs, for which there are no alternative sources grown in the EU (Popp et al., 2013), and is the largest importer of soybean meal and the second largest importer of soybeans after China (Fig. 4 and 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Popp et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11Poultry are the single largest domestic user of soybean meal, consuming about half of all meal, followed by swine.
“Poultry continue to be the single largest domestic user of soybean meal, consuming about half of all meal, followed by swine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7Cattle fed or finished in feedyards made up the majority (82%) of the cattle at harvest but represented a minority (12%) of the cattle condemned.
“Cattle fed or finished in feedyards, typically for 120 d before slaughter on high concentrate diets containing corn and soy as major ingredients, made up the majority (82%) of the cattle at harvest but represented a minority (12%) of the cattle condemned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites White and Moore, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
- Rests on an assumption: Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7The rate of broiler carcass condemnation decreased significantly over time and was at its lowest in 2011.
“The rate of broiler carcass condemnation decreased significantly over time and was at its lowest in 2011.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
- Rests on an assumption: Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11The EU is the largest importer of soybean meal and the second largest importer of soybeans after China.
“The EU imports 65% of its protein-rich feedstuffs, for which there are no alternative sources grown in the EU (Popp et al., 2013), and is the largest importer of soybean meal and the second largest importer of soybeans after China (Fig. 4 and 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 4 and 5
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11Approximately 85% of soybean and 57% of corn grain production are used in global livestock diets annually.
“It is estimated that approximately 85% of soybean and 57% of corn grain production (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2014b) are used in global livestock diets annually.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2014b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7Condemnation rates for non-fed cattle, particularly cows, were higher than for fed cattle, but the rate in 2007 (2.49%) was similar to that reported in cattle in 1994 (2.6%) before the introduction of GE crops.
“Condemnation rates for non-fed cattle, particularly cows, were higher than for fed cattle, but the rate in 2007 (2.49%), the last year for which data are available, was similar to that reported in cattle in 1994 (2.6%; Boleman et al., 1998), before the introduction of GE crops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boleman et al., 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
- Rests on an assumption: Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 5United States agriculture feeds billions of food-producing animals each year, with annual broiler numbers alone exceeding the current size of the global human population.
“United States agriculture feeds billions of food-producing animals each year, with annual broiler numbers alone exceeding the current size of the global human population (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11About 70% of soybean meal consumed in the EU is imported and 80% of this meal is produced from GE soybeans.
“About 70% of soybean meal consumed in the EU is imported and 80% of this meal is produced from GE soybeans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7The available health parameters-somatic cell count in dairy, postmortem condemnation rates in cattle, and postmortem condemnation rates and mortality in poultry-all decreased (improved) over time.
“The available health parameters, somatic cell count (an indicator of mastitis and inflammation in the udder) in the dairy data set (Fig. 1), postmortem condemnation rates in cattle (Fig. 1), and postmortem condemnation rates and mortality in the poultry industry (Fig. 2) all decreased (i.e., improved) over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
- Rests on an assumption: Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11In the 2011 to 2012 marketing year, domestic animal agriculture used 27.6 million t of U.S. soybean meal.
“In the 2011 to 2012 marketing year, domestic animal agriculture used 27.6 million t of U.S. soybean meal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11In Asia, consumption of meat and dairy products has been increasing annually by approximately 3 and 5%, respectively.
“In Asia alone, consumption of meat and dairy products has been increasing annually by approximately 3 and 5%, respectively (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15In 2011, the United States had 1.26 million ha of certified organic cropland and 0.93 million ha of certified organic pasture and range.
“In 2011, the United States had 1.26 million ha of certified organic cropland and 0.93 million ha of certified organic pasture and range (USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15This translates into roughly 0.8 and 0.5% of total U.S. cropland and pasture/rangeland, respectively.
“This translates into roughly 0.8 and 0.5% of total U.S. cropland and pasture/rangeland, respectively (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 7
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15The amount of organic farmland increased well over 1,000% in these countries between 2002 and 2006, while organic farmland in Europe and North America showed slower (27-80%) expansion rates.
“The amount of organic farmland increased well over 1,000% in these countries between 2002 and 2006, while organic farmland in Europe and North America showed slower (27-80%) expansion rates (Grow and Greene, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grow and Greene, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15In 2009, Canada was the main market for U.S. organic exports, while countries in Latin America, including Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay, along with China and other countries in Asia are major sources of organic imports.
“In 2009, Canada was the main market for U.S. organic exports, while countries in Latin America, including Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay, along with China and other countries in Asia are major sources of organic imports (Grow and Greene, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grow and Greene, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11Three of the top 5 corn exporting countries-the United States, Brazil, and Argentina-currently grow GE corn.
“Three of the top 5 corn exporting countries-the United States, Brazil, and Argentina-currently grow GE corn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Dairy · p. 16During 2011, approximately 254,700 dairy cows (2.78% of the total U.S. dairy herd) on 1,848 dairy operations were certified organic.
“During 2011, approximately 254,700 dairy cows (2.78% of the total U.S. dairy herd; Table 2) on 1,848 dairy operations were certified organic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 2
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13China has a zero-tolerance policy for unapproved events.
“China has a zero-tolerance policy for unapproved events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15The countries with the fastest growth in organic production are those that produce organic products for export including China, Bolivia, Chile, Uruguay, and Ukraine.
“The countries with the fastest growth in organic production are those that produce organic products for export including China, Bolivia, Chile, Uruguay, and Ukraine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grow and Greene, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15In 2013, the United States imported over $100 million of organic soybeans primarily from China and India.
“In 2013, the United States imported over $100 million of organic soybeans primarily from China and India (Fig. 8; Global Agricultural Trade System online [GATS] organic products www.fas.usda. gov/commodities/organic-products).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 8; Global Agricultural Trade System online [GATS] organic products www.fas.usda. gov/commodities/organic-products
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13The main driver for non-GE feed is the poultry sector (17%) followed by the cattle (9%) and pig sectors (2%).
“The main driver for non-GE feed is the poultry sector (17%) followed by the cattle (9%) and pig sectors (2%; European Feed Manufacturers' Federation, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites European Feed Manufacturers' Federation, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingreasoning§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15The proportion of organic imports used for livestock feed versus human food purposes is unavailable as import product codes do not distinguish between these uses.
“The proportion of organic imports used for livestock feed versus human food purposes is unavailable as import product codes do not distinguish between these uses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15In 2007, USDA-accredited groups certified 27,000 producers and handlers worldwide to the U.S. organic standard, with approximately 16,000 in the United States and 11,000 in over 100 foreign countries.
“In 2007, USDA-accredited groups certified 27,000 producers and handlers worldwide to the U.S. organic standard, with approximately 16,000 in the United States and 11,000 in over 100 foreign countries (Grow and Greene, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grow and Greene, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11Of the top 5 corn importing countries-Japan, Mexico, the EU, South Korea, and Egypt-only 5 countries within the EU (Spain, Portugal, Romania, Czechoslovakia, and Slovakia) grew a small amount (148,013 ha) of BtMON810 corn.
“Of the top 5 corn importing countries-Japan, Mexico, the EU, South Korea, and Egypt-only 5 countries within the EU (Spain, Portugal, Romania, Czechoslovakia, and Slovakia) grew a small amount (148,013 ha) of BtMON810 corn (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2014a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2014a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11Corn is the second largest category of GE products imported into the EU after soy.
“Corn is the second largest category of GE products imported into the EU after soy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15Consumers wishing to purchase products from animals fed non-GE diets in the United States currently have that choice available through certified NOP products, the FSIS-approved Non-GMO Project verified label claim for meat and liquid eggs, and other non-GMO certification programs.
“Consumers wishing to purchase products from animals fed non-GE diets in the United States currently have that choice available through certified NOP prod -ucts, the FSIS-approved Non-GMO Project verified label claim for meat and liquid eggs, and other non-genetically modified organism certification programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13In 2007, asynchronous approval of a GE corn variety approved for cultivation in Argentina but unapproved for food and feed use in the EU concentrated demand on corn grown in Brazil, which increased prices an estimated €50/million t for compound feed producers in the EU.
“Similarly, in 2007 there was a problem with asynchronous approval of a GE corn variety approved for cultivation in Argentina but unapproved for food and feed use in the EU. This concentrated demand on corn grown in Brazil, which in -creased prices an estimated €50/million t for compound feed producers in the EU (Popp et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Popp et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13Farm animal feed in the EU-27 is composed of 50% roughages and 10% grains produced on farm, 10% purchased feed materials, and 30% industrial compound feed.
“Farm animal feed in the 27 member states of the European Union (EU-27) is composed of 50% roughages and 10% grains produced on farm, 10% purchased feed materials, and 30% industrial compound feed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14China only accepts GE-positive cargo if the shipment is marked accordingly and contains only those GE events that are approved for import in China as well as cultivation in the country of origin.
“China only accepts GE-positive cargo if the shipment is marked accordingly and contains only those GE events that are approved for import in China as well as cultivation in the country of origin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14In 2013, 4 major United Kingdom food supermarket groups-Tesco, Cooperative, Marks and Spencer, and Sainsbury's-ceased requiring that poultry and egg suppliers use only non-GE feed.
“In 2013, 4 major United Kingdom food supermarket groups-Tesco, Cooperative, Marks and Spencer, and Sainsbury's-ceased requiring that poultry and egg suppliers use only non-GE feed (Popp et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Popp et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15In March 2013, Whole Foods Market set a deadline that by 2018, animal products sold in its U.S. and Canadian stores must be labeled to indicate whether or not they came from animals that had consumed GE feed.
“For example, in March 2013, the retail chain Whole Foods Market set a deadline that by 2018, animal products sold in its U.S. and Canadian stores must be labeled to indicate whether or not they came from animals that had consumed GE feed (Whole Foods Market, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Whole Foods Market, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone given§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13Since trade disruptions began, a total of 3.3 million t of U.S. corn have been subject to rejection and diverted shipments (1.4 million t) or canceled or deferred sales.
“Since these trade disruptions began, a total of 3.3 million t of U.S. corn have been subject to re-”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Dairy · p. 16Organically raised livestock accounted for $1.31 billion in sales in 2011.
“Organically raised livestock accounted for $1.31 billion in sales in 2011, the last year with a complete set of data on production and sales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13Of the top 5 soybean meal exporting countries in 2013-Argentina, Brazil, the United States, India, and Paraguay-only India does not allow the cultivation of GE soybeans.
“Of the top 5 soybean meal exporting countries in 2013-Argentina, Brazil, the United States, India, and Paraguay-only India does not allow the cultivation of GE soybeans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11The remaining 2 top 5 corn exporting countries-Ukraine and India-do not have officially registered and approved GE corn varieties.
“The remaining 2 countries-Ukraine and India-do not have officially registered and approved GE corn varieties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15In 2007, approximately half of the accredited foreign organic farmers and handlers certified to NOP standards were in Canada, Italy, Turkey, China, and Mexico.
“In 2007, approximately half of the accredited foreign organic farmers and handlers certified to NOP standards were in Canada, Italy, Turkey, China, and Mexico.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grow and Greene, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11Annual EU imports of corn products include US$1.8 billion of corn, $151 million of corn seed for planting, and $87 million of dried distillers grains.
“Annual EU imports of corn products include US$1.8 billion of corn, $151 million of corn seed for planting, and $87 million of dried distillers grains (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2013a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2013a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13In the EU, less than 15% of the animal feed market is identity-preserved certified non-GE, although there are great variations between countries.
“It has been estimated that in the EU, less than 15% of the animal feed market is identity-preserved certified non-GE, although there are great variations between countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13The estimated size of the export market requiring certified non-GE corn is 7.3 million t or 7%.
“The estimated size of the export market requiring certified non-GE corn is 7.3 million t or 7% (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 6
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11EU corn production is sufficient to meet most of its own corn consumption, with imports accounting for only 10% of total supply.
“Unlike soybean, EU corn production is sufficient to meet most of its own corn consumption, with imports accounting for only 10% of total supply.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14Up to $2.9 billion in economic losses were sustained by the U.S. corn, distillers' grains, and soy sectors in the aftermath of the zero-tolerance enforcement policy on U.S. export shipments to China.
“It has been estimated that up to $2.9 billion in economic losses were sustained by the U.S. corn, distillers' grains, and soy sectors in the aftermath of the ze -ro-tolerance enforcement policy on U.S. export shipments to China (National Grain and Feed Association, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites National Grain and Feed Association, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14Ukraine does not export or import GE products as none are officially registered and approved for commercial use or sale in the country.
“Ukraine does not export or import GE products as none are officially registered and approved for commer -cial use or sale in the country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11Approximately 11.6% (100 million t) of global corn production was internationally traded in 2013.
“Approximately 11.6% (100 million t) of global corn production was internationally traded in 2013.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Dairy · p. 16Less than 2% of U.S. dairy production is currently organic.
“Organic milk led livestock commodities, accounting for $765 million, or 58%, of organic animal product sales; however, less than 2% of U.S. dairy production is currently organic (Hafla et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hafla et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14Ukraine signed a 3-yr agreement with China in 2013 for the delivery of 4 to 5 million t of corn per year.
“Interestingly, Ukraine signed a 3-yr agreement with China in 2013 for the delivery of 4 to 5 million t of corn per year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14Private sources estimate approximately 60% of the Ukraine soybean crop and 30% of the corn crop consist of GE varieties.
“However, private sources estimate approximately 60% of the Ukraine soybean crop and 30% of the corn crop consist of GE varieties (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2013b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2013b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Dairy · p. 16The retail price for organic milk between 2004 and 2007 averaged 3 times the cost of conventional milk.
“The retail price for or -ganic milk between 2004 and 2007 averaged 3 times the cost of conventional milk (USDA Economic Research Service, 2012b), and in 2013, organic milk made up 4.38% of total U.S. fluid milk market sales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Economic Research Service, 2012b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Poultry · p. 17In 2011, sales of U.S. organic broilers and eggs totaled $115 million and $276 million, representing 0.5 and 3.7% of total sales, respectively.
“In 2011, sales of U.S. organic broilers and eggs totaled $115 million and $276 million, representing 0.5 and 3.7% of total sales, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ The Future · p. 18Several of these crops are far advanced in the regulatory pipeline.
“Several of these crops are far advanced in the regulatory pipeline (Table 8; Tillie et al., 2013)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 8; Tillie et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17In 2013, approximately 175.2 million ha of GE crops were cultivated worldwide by 18 million farmers.
“In 2013, approximately 175.2 million ha of GE crops were cultivated worldwide (James, 2013) by 18 million farmers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites James, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Beef · p. 16The price of natural/organic beef averaged $12.08/kg in the first quarter of 2011, which represented a premium of $3.75/kg.
“The price of natural/organic beef averaged $12.08/kg in the first quarter of 2011, which represent -ed a premium of $3.75/kg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17In China, 7.5 million farmers cultivating an average of approximately 0.5 ha collectively grew 4.2 million ha of Bt cotton, an adoption rate of 90%.
“In China, 7.5 million farmers cultivating an average of approximately 0.5 ha collectively grew 4.2 million ha of Bt cotton, an adoption rate of 90%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Beef · p. 16Organic beef cattle may be finished in feedlots for no more than 120 d and must have access to pasture during this time.
“Organic beef cattle may be finished in feedlots for no more than 120 d and must have access to pasture during this time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Beef · p. 16Natural, organic, and grass/forage-fed account for about 3% of the U.S. beef market.
“Natural, organic (grain-fed or otherwise), and grass/ forage-fed (including cattle finished on grasses/forages to a specific quality standard) account for about 3% of the U.S. beef market (Mathews and Johnson, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mathews and Johnson, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ The Future · p. 18Currently, 33 countries have regulatory systems that handle approval for the cultivation or importation of new GE crops.
“Currently, 33 countries have regulatory systems that handle approval for the cultivation or importation of new GE crops (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Beef · p. 16Silage is an accepted feed that can consist of relatively large portions of grain.
“However, silage is an accepted feed that can consist of relatively large portions of grain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Beef · p. 16Under the AMS Process Verified Program grass-fed standard, grass or forage must be the exclusive feed source throughout the lifetime of the ruminant animal except for milk consumed before weaning.
“Under this verification standard, grass or forage must be the exclusive feed source throughout the lifetime of the ruminant animal except for milk consumed before weaning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Beef · p. 16The USDA NE3 Process Verified Program does not mandate or specify the use of non-GE feed.
“Likewise, the USDA NE3 Process Verified Program does not mandate or specify the use of non-GE feed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ The Future · p. 18There are numerous GE crops enhanced for animal nutrition in the research and development pipeline, with almost 100 events under research in many countries.
“There are numerous GE crops enhanced for animal nutrition in the research and development pipeline, with almost 100 events under research in many countries of the world (Tillie et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tillie et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17By 2020, developing countries will consume 107 million t more meat and 177 million t more milk than the annual average of the years 1996 through 1998.
“By 2020, developing countries will consume 107 million t more meat and 177 million t more milk than the annual average of the years 1996 through 1998.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Delgado, 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ The Future · p. 18Protocols have been developed to address the safety testing of these crops.
“Protocols have been developed to address the safety testing of these crops (International Life Sciences Institute, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites International Life Sciences Institute, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Poultry · p. 17The largest volume of organic meat sales is for poultry.
“The largest volume of organic meat sales is for poultry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Beef · p. 16In 2011, 106,181 beef cows (0.34% of the total U.S. beef cows) and 113,114 unclassified cows and young stock were raised in certified organic production systems.
“In 2011, 106,181 beef cows (0.34% of the total U.S. beef cows; Table 2) and 113,114 unclassified cows and young stock were raised in certified organic production systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 2
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 18GE crops have resulted in a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, which in 2012 alone was equivalent to removing 11.88 million cars from the roads.
“As a result of fuel savings associated with making fewer spray runs, the adoption of production systems with reduced tillage, and additional soil carbon sequestration, GE crops have also resulted in a significant reduction in the release of greenhouse gas emissions, which, in 2012 alone, was equivalent to removing 11.88 million cars from the roads (Brookes and Barfoot, 2014b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brookes and Barfoot, 2014b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingreasoning§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17Over 90% (>16.5 million) of these farmers were small-scale, resource-poor farmers in developing countries.
“Over 90% (>16.5 million) were small-scale, resource-poor farmers in developing countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Poultry · p. 17In 2011, certified organic broilers totaled more than 28 million (0.33% of total U.S. broilers), layer hens totaled more than 6.6 million (1.97% of total U.S. layers), and turkeys totaled 504,000 (0.20% of total U.S. turkeys).
“In 2011, the number of certified organic broilers totaled more than 28 million (0.33% of the total U.S. broilers; Table 2), layer hens totaled more than 6.6 million (1.97% of the total U.S. layers), and turkeys totaled 504,000 (0.20% of the total U.S. turkeys).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 2
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Beef · p. 16The animal cannot be fed grain or any grain byproduct before marketing and must have continuous access to pasture during the growing season.
“The animal cannot be fed grain or any grain byproduct before marketing and must have continuous access to pasture during the growing season.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17India cultivated 11.0 million ha of Bt cotton with an adoption rate of 95%.
“India cultivated 11.0 million ha of Bt cotton with an adoption rate of 95%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Dairy · p. 16In 2013, organic milk made up 4.38% of total U.S. fluid milk market sales.
“The retail price for or -ganic milk between 2004 and 2007 averaged 3 times the cost of conventional milk (USDA Economic Research Service, 2012b), and in 2013, organic milk made up 4.38% of total U.S. fluid milk market sales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Poultry · p. 17The retail price for organic poultry and eggs between 2004 and 2006 was approximately twice that of conventional products.
“The retail price for organic poultry and eggs between 2004 and 2006 was approximately twice that of conventional products (USDA Economic Research Service, 2012a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Economic Research Service, 2012a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Beef · p. 16Corn silage averages 10 to 20% grain and can consist of up to a third or more grain, blurring the distinction between grain fed and forage fed.
“For example, corn silage, which averages 10 to 20% grain and can consist of up to a third or more grain, blurs the distinction between grain fed and forage fed (Mathews and Johnson, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mathews and Johnson, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Poultry · p. 17Voluntary labeling programs and market premiums exist for products derived from animals that have not consumed GE feed.
“V oluntary labeling programs and market premiums exist for products derived from animals that have not consumed GE feed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ The Future · p. 18Sampling, testing, and certification depend on statistical processes, and hence all are subject to some error, which increases at very low tolerances.
“Sampling, testing, and certification depend on statistical processes, however, and hence all are subject to some error, which increases at very low tolerances (Lamb and Booker, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lamb and Booker, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ The Future · p. 18Currently, the most accepted techniques for the detection of rDNA and protein products are PCR and ELISA, respectively.
“Currently, the most accepted techniques for the detection of rDNA and protein products are PCR and ELISA, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ The Future · p. 18Although efforts have been taken to harmonize analytical methodology for the detection of GE products at national, regional, and international levels, no international standards have yet been established.
“Although efforts have been taken to harmonize analytical methodology for the detection of GE products at national, regional, and international levels, no international standards have yet been established (Holst-Jensen et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holst-Jensen et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ Conclusions · p. 20Global trade of livestock feed is largely supplied by countries that have approved the cultivation of GE crops.
“Animal agriculture is currently highly dependent on GE feed sources, and global trade of livestock feed is largely supplied by countries that have approved the cultivation of GE crops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ Conclusions · p. 20Commercial livestock populations are the largest consumers of GE crops.
“Commercial livestock populations are the largest consumers of GE crops, and globally, billions of animals have been eating GE feed for almost 2 decades.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ The Future · p. 18Various analytical methods have been developed and are routinely used for the monitoring of GE origin in raw materials and processed foods.
“Various analytical methods have been developed and are routinely used for the monitoring of GE origin in raw materials and processed foods and have been reviewed elsewhere (Alexander et al., 2007; Marmiroli et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alexander et al., 2007; Marmiroli et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ Conclusions · p. 20There is currently a pipeline of so-called 'second generation' GE crops with improved output traits for livestock production.
“There is currently a pipeline of so-called 'second generation' GE crops with improved output traits for livestock production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 20The cost of non-GE-fed animal products is higher than conventionally produced products due to both the higher cost of non-GE feed and the costs associated with certifying the absence of GE crops in the production process and product segregation.
“The cost of these products is higher than conventionally produced products due to both the higher cost of non-GE feed and the costs associated with certifying the absence of GE crops in the production process and product segregation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Conclusions · p. 20Such products are available to interested consumers via voluntary process-based marketing programs.
“The market for animals that have not consumed GE feed is currently a niche market in the United States, although such products are available to interested consumers via voluntary processbased marketing programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 1No significant differences in feed digestibility, performance, or health have been observed in livestock that consume GE feed.
“no significant differences in feed digestibility, performance, or health have been observed in livestock that consume GE feed (Flachowsky et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flachowsky et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 2The European Food Safety Authority states that 90-day subchronic rodent testing is only warranted when driven by a specific hypothesis indicated by molecular, compositional, phenotypic, agronomic, or other analysis of the particular GE event.
“the European Food Safety Authority (2008; Parma, Italy) states that such testing is only warranted when driven by a specific hypothesis indicated by mo -lecular, compositional, phenotypic, agronomic, or other analysis (e.g., metabolic pathway considerations) of the particular GE event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites European Food Safety Authority, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3Results from comprehensive studies revealed the compositional and nutritional noninferiority of GE corn to its isogenic control and an absence of long-term adverse effects from GE corn consumption.
“Results from these comprehensive studies revealed the compositional and nutritional noninferiority of GE corn to its isogenic control and an absence of long-term adverse effects from GE corn consumption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 2The poison alpha-solanine was unintentionally increased to unacceptable levels in certain varieties of potato through plant breeding, resulting in certain cultivars being withdrawn from the United States and Swedish markets.
“α-solanine, a glycoalkaloid, was unintentionally increased to unacceptable levels in certain varieties of potato through plant breeding resulting in certain cultivars being withdrawn from the U.S. and Swedish markets due to frequently exceeding the upper safe limit for total glycoalkaloid content (Petersson et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Petersson et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 2Many toxicologists concur that animal feeding trials of whole GE food have low power to detect adverse effects and contribute little to the safety assessment of whole foods.
“Many toxicologists concur that animal feeding trials of whole GE food have a low power to detect adverse effects and contribute little, if anything, to the safety assessment of whole foods (Kuiper et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kuiper et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3Antibodies specific to the GE corn protein Cry1Ab were not detected in the blood, indicating the absence of an allergic-type immune response to the protein.
“Antibodies specific to the GE corn protein (Cry1Ab) were not detected in the blood, indicating the absence of an allergic-type immune response to the protein.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3Neither the cry1Ab gene nor the Cry1Ab protein was found in the blood, organs, or products of animals fed GE corn.
“Neither the cry1Ab gene nor the Cry1Ab protein was found in the blood, organs, or products of animals fed GE corn”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3Neither the intact recombinant DNA nor the intact recombinant protein migrated from the digestive system of the animal into other body tissues or edible animal products.
“indicating that neither the intact rDNA nor the intact recombinant protein migrated from the digestive system of the animal into other body tissues or edible animal products.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3The European Food Safety Authority clarified the difference between statistical significance and biological relevance.
“The European Food Safety Authority clarified the difference between statis -tical significance and biological relevance (European Food Safety Authority, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites European Food Safety Authority, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Livestock Feeding Studies with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 3There were no adverse effects of feeding GE corn on small intestinal morphology or the gut microbiota.
“there were no adverse effects of feeding GE corn on small intestinal morphology or the gut microbiota.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7The feed conversion ratio would be expected to worsen (increase) if the health of broilers was deteriorating following exposure to GE feed.
“but this ratio is something that would be expected to worsen (i.e., increase) if the health of these animals was deteriorating following exposure to GE feed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: If animal feed derived from GE crops had deleterious effects on animals consuming GE feed, then animal performance and health attributes in these large commercial livestock populations would have been negatively impacted.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 9Studies have concluded that animals do not digest transgenic and native plant DNA differently and that rDNA from GE crops has not been detected in animal products.
“Studies have concluded that animals do not digest transgenic and native plant DNA differently and that rDNA from GE crops has not been detected in animal products (Einspanier, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Einspanier, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 7Broilers are exposed to large amounts of corn and soybean meal during their 42- to 49-d lifespan and increase their body size 60-fold during this period, making them very sensitive to dietary perturbations.
“Although broilers are exposed to large amounts of corn and soybean meal during their 42- to 49-d lifespan, they increase their body size 60fold during this period, making them very sensitive to dietary perturbations (European Food Safety Authority, 2008; International Life Sciences Institute, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites European Food Safety Authority, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites International Life Sciences Institute, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: In a typical U.S. broiler operation, chickens are fed for 42–49 d on diets composed of approximately 35% soybean meal and 65% corn grain.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 8Adverse effects, including high rates of tumorogenesis, sterility, premature mortality, and histopathological abnormalities, have been reported in these studies.
“Adverse effects, including high rates of tumorogenesis, sterility, premature mortality, and histopathological abnormalities have been reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 9Neither recombinant DNA nor protein has ever been found in milk, meat, or eggs from animals that have eaten GE feed, with the exception of a single study that reported fragments of transgenic DNA in both 'organic' and 'conventional' milk in Italy.
“however, neither recombinant DNA nor protein has ever been found in milk, meat, or eggs from animals that have eaten GE feed with the exception of a single study that reported the presence of fragments of transgenic DNA in both 'organic' and 'conventional' milk in Italy (Agodi et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Agodi et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 8Some of these reports were published and then retracted, and others were never subjected to peer review.
“Some of these reports were published and then retracted (Séralini et al., 2012), although recently and controversially republished without further peer review (Séralini et al., 2014), and others were never subjected to peer review (Ermakova, 2005; Velmirov et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 9The DNA from GE crops is chemically equivalent to DNA from other sources and both are thoroughly broken down in the gastrointestinal tract during digestion.
“The DNA from GE crops is chemically equivalent to DNA from other sources and both are thoroughly broken down in the gastrointestinal tract during digestion (Beever and Kemp, 2000; Jonas et al., 2001; CAST, 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Beever and Kemp, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jonas et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CAST, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11Increase in demand for animal products, especially meat, will drive demand for grain and protein feeds.
“Increase in demand for animal products, especially meat, will drive demand for grain and protein feeds (USDA Economic Research Service, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USDA Economic Research Service, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Field Datasets of Livestock Populations Fed with Genetically Engineered Feed · p. 9Despite a wealth of studies and literature to the contrary, these isolated and poorly designed studies have resulted in the promulgation of new regulations, including a mandatory 90-d rodent subchronic toxicity feeding study for all new GE approvals in the EU, and have generated a great deal of media attention.
“Despite a wealth of studies and literature to the contrary, these isolated and poorly designed studies have resulted in the promulgation of new regulations, including a mandatory 90-d rodent subchronic toxicity feeding study for all new GE approvals in the EU (Kuiper et al., 2013), and have generated a great deal of media attention (Arjó et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2013 Data on Global Production and Trade in Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs and Sources of Non-Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs · p. 11FAO predicts that by 2050 global grain trade will double to 600 million t.
“The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Rome, Italy) predicts that by 2050 global grain trade will double to 600 million t (Bruinsma 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bruinsma 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Soybean Meal Production, Imports, Exports and Feed by Country 2013 · p. 13U.S. GE corn plantings caused a drastic decline in corn exports to the EU because of trade disruptions due to asynchronous approvals.
“The United States used to be a major supplier of corn to the EU in the 1990s but GE corn plantings in the United States caused a drastic decline in corn exports to the EU because of trade disruptions due to asynchronous approvals (i.e., cultivation approvals of specific GE varieties in the United States occurring before food and feed import approvals in the EU).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14Given asynchronous regulatory approvals and shared harvesting machinery and storage facilities, trade disruption appears almost unavoidable if importing countries enforce a zero-tolerance policy for unapproved events that have been approved for cultivation in exporting countries.
“Given asynchronous regulatory approvals and the realities of agricultural production systems where harvesting machinery and storage facilities are shared among different production systems, trade disruption appears almost unavoidable if importing countries enforce a 'zerotolerance' policy for unapproved events that have been approved for cultivation in exporting countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Harvesting machinery and storage facilities are shared among different agricultural production systems.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Corn by Country - Production, Imports, Export, Feed 2013 · p. 14As global production of GE feed crops continues to rise, the EU's stringent GE tolerance levels (0.9% GE material limit plus 0.05% measuring uncertainty tolerance) and zero tolerance for unapproved events are complicating the maintenance of non-GE supply chains.
“As the global production of GE feed crops continues to rise, the EU's stringent GE tolerance levels (0.9% GE material limit plus 0.05% measuring uncertainty tolerance) and zero tolerance for unapproved events are complicating the maintenance of non-GE supply chains (Popp et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Popp et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15The availability and cost of certified organic feeds is a major challenge for U.S. organic livestock producers.
“The availability and cost of certified organic feeds is a major challenge for U.S. or -ganic livestock producers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Dairy · p. 16Production costs for organic dairies are greater than for conventional dairies due to the increased cost of organic feed and the increased use of labor and capital, which is not scale neutral as total costs per unit of production drops sharply as herd size increases.
“Production costs for organic dairies are greater than for conventional dairies due to the increased cost of organic feed and the increased use of labor and capital, which is not scale neutral as the total costs per unit of production drops sharply as herd size increases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15Voluntary process-based labels verify that GE crops were not used in the production process, rather than testing for the presence of GE content in the animal products themselves, as such products contain no detectable and quantifiable traces of GE materials.
“These voluntary process-based labels, in effect, verify that GE crops were not used in the production process, rather than testing for the presence of GE content in the animal products themselves as such products contain no detectable and quantifiable traces of GE materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Current U.S. Options for Products from Non-Genetically Engineered Fed Livestock · p. 15Given high rates of GE adoption in major feed crops, U.S. producers wishing to purchase non-GE feed likely contract with growers or source identity-preserved (certified non-GE) or organic feed.
“Given the high rates of GE adoption in major feed crops, U.S. producers wishing to purchase non-GE feed for their livestock likely contract with growers or source identity-preserved (certified non-GE) or organic feed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ The Future · p. 18Genetic engineering offers new possibilities for approaching both objectives, including improving the nutritional value of feed, lowering N and P pollution through altered crop composition, and reducing manure excretion through a higher NE value.
“Genetic engineering offers new possibilities for approaching both of these objectives, including improving the nutritional value of feed (e.g., AA content; Huang et al., 2006), lowering N and P pollution through altered crop composition (e.g., low phytate; Chen et al., 2008), and reducing manure excretion through a higher NE value (e.g., reduced lignin; Jung et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ The Future · p. 18Given different regulatory approaches for compositionally equivalent crops, it is unclear how regulatory requirements may vary between countries in terms of the number and length of target animal feeding studies for these crops with altered output traits.
“However, given the different regulatory approaches that are in place for crops that are compositionally equivalent, it is unclear how regulatory requirements may vary between countries in terms of the number and length of target animal feeding studies for these crops with altered output traits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ The Future · p. 18Second generation crops modified for output traits will pose some regulatory and commercialization challenges.
“These so-called 'second generation' crops modified for output traits will pose some regulatory and com -mercialization challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17Feedstuffs are a major contributor to life cycle assessments in the production of meat, milk, and eggs on a national and global scale.
“Feedstuffs are a major contributor to life cycle assessments in the production of meat, milk, and eggs on a national and global scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Poultry · p. 17Reversion from GE to conventional crop varieties would require the adoption of altered agronomic practices to manage those crops and relinquishment of the documented environmental and economic benefits associated with the adoption of GE crops.
“Reversion from GE to conventional crop varieties would require the adoption of altered agronomic practices to manage those crops and relinquishment of the documented environmental and economic benefits as -sociated with the adoption of GE crops (Areal et al., 2013; Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2014; Green, 2012; NRC, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Areal et al., 2013; Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2014; Green, 2012; NRC, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17This planting was greater than a 100-fold increase from the 1.7 million ha that were planted in 1996, making GE the fastest-adopted crop technology in recent history.
“This planting was greater than a 100-fold increase from the 1.7 million ha that were planted in 1996, making GE the fastest-adopted crop technology in recent history.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ The Future · p. 18If benefits derived from growing these crops accrue to the livestock producer or feeder and not directly to the farmer growing the crop, there will need to be some form of supply chain segregation in place to ensure a price premium is obtained for the value-added output trait.
“Additionally, if the benefits derived from growing these crops accrue to the livestock producer or feeder and not directly to the farmer growing the crop, there will need to be some form of supply chain segregation in place to ensure a price premium is obtained for the value-added output trait.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ The Future · p. 18There are 2 ways in which plant breeding might increase the efficiency of livestock production: raising crop yield per hectare and improving the rate of conversion of vegetable calories into animal calories.
“There are 2 ways in which plant breeding might increase the efficiency of livestock production; the first is by raising the crop yield per hect -are (e.g., improved drought tolerance or N use efficiency) and the second is by improving the rate of conversion of vegetable calories into animal calories (e.g., altered output traits or crop composition).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ The Future · p. 18Second generation crops will not, by definition, be substantially equivalent to isogenic non-GE varieties.
“The first is that they will not, by definition, be substantially equivalent to isogenic non-GE varieties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Impact of Genetically Engineered Feedstuffs on the Sustainability of Livestock Production · p. 17Farmers have planted these GE varieties to enable the adoption of improved agronomic practices (e.g., reduced insecticide applications) providing environmental, economic, and food security benefits in various countries.
“Farmers have planted these GE varieties to enable the adoption of improved agronomic practices (e.g., reduced insecticide applications) providing environmental, economic, and food security benefits in various countries (Ali and Abdulai, 2010; Burachik, 2010; Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2010; Kathage and Qaim, 2012; Qaim and Kouser, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ali and Abdulai, 2010; Burachik, 2010; Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2010; Kathage and Qaim, 2012; Qaim and Kouser, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Dairy · p. 16Using pasture as a source of dairy forage is more common on organic dairies, which can help reduce feed costs per cow but also contributes to lower production per cow.
“Using pasture as a source of dairy forage is more common on organic dairies, which can help to reduce feed costs per cow but also contributes to lower production per cow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Beef · p. 16The term 'natural' is not associated with an official production process standard so natural beef may come from animals that have consumed GE feed.
“The term 'natural' is not associated with an official production process standard so natural beef may come from animals that have consumed GE feed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ The Future · p. 19The range of GE crop species being grown and traded is expanding.
“2) the expanding range of GE crop species being grown and traded;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kalaitzandonakes et al. (2014) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ The Future · p. 19The pipeline of novel GE crop events, including second-generation crops modified for output traits, is expanding.
“These include 1) the expanding pipeline of novel GE crop events, including second generation crops modified for output traits;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kalaitzandonakes et al. (2014) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Future · p. 18Asynchronous approvals have resulted in trade disruptions, especially when countries use a zero-tolerance policy for unapproved events, meaning that even minute traces of unapproved GE crops are illegal and must be withdrawn from the market.
“As discussed previously, this has resulted in trade disruptions, especially when countries use a 'zero-tolerance' policy for unapproved events, meaning that even minute traces of unapproved GE crops are illegal and must be withdrawn from the market.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ The Future · p. 20Recent developments may lead to a revaluation of the current rDNA process-based regulatory trigger for GE organisms to a more scientifically defensible product-based approach centered on the novelty and any unique risks associated with the phenotype of the product rather than the process used to accomplish the genetic modification.
“These developments may lead to a revaluation of the current rDNA process-based regulatory trigger for GE organisms to a more scientifically defensible product-based approach centered on the novelty and any unique risks associated with the phenotype of the product rather than the process used to accomplish the genetic modification (Bradford et al., 2005; McHughen, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Future · p. 18Countries with zero-tolerance policies will be perceived as risky export markets, and importers will pay higher prices and insurance premiums to offset risks taken by the supplier.
“Countries with zero-tolerance policies will be perceived as risky export markets, and importers will pay higher prices and insurance premiums to offset risks taken by the supplier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 20The approval of second-generation GE crops with improved output traits will further complicate the sourcing of non-GE feedstuffs.
“Their approval will further complicate the sourcing of non-GE feedstuffs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ The Future · p. 19The emergence of precise gene-editing technologies will further complicate the regulatory situation for GE crops and animals.
“will further complicate this situation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim and Kim, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The Future · p. 19The global hectarage of GE crops and the number of countries that raise them are expanding.
“3) the expanding global hectarage of GE crops and the growing number of countries that raise them;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kalaitzandonakes et al. (2014) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The Future · p. 19Regulatory expertise in many countries is nascent and inexperienced, and these countries will be called on to manage a large number of regulatory submissions for new GE crops in the future.
“4) the nascent and inexperienced regulatory expertise in many countries that will be called on to manage a large number of regulatory submissions for new GE crops in the future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kalaitzandonakes et al. (2014) source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
DNA and protein are normal components of the diet and are digested.
“Because DNA and protein are normal components of the diet that are digested”
The paper relies on this without support.
Globally, countries that are cultivating GE corn and soy are the major livestock feed exporters.
“Globally, countries that are cultivating GE corn and soy are the major livestock feed exporters.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Asynchronous regulatory approvals have resulted in trade disruptions.
“Asynchronous regulatory approvals (i.e., cultivation approvals of GE varieties in exporting countries occurring before food and feed approvals in importing countries) have resulted in trade disruptions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Plant varieties developed through other processes of achieving genetic changes, such as radiation mutagenesis, go through no formal risk assessment before being placed on the market.
“By contrast, plant varieties developed through other processes of achieving genetic changes (e.g., radiation mutagenesis) go through no formal risk assessment before being placed on the market.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The United States and Australia/New Zealand explicitly do not require a 90-day subchronic rodent feeding study or actively discourage their conduct due to their negligible scientific value.
“The United States and Australia/New Zealand explicitly do not require a 90-d subchronic rodent feeding study or actively discourage their conduct due to their negligible scientific value.”
The paper relies on this without support.
GE proteins are digested in the gut and no intact GE protein has been found in the bloodstream.
“especially given that GE proteins are digested in the gut and no intact GE protein has been found in the bloodstream.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are a large number of second-generation GE crops with altered output traits for improved livestock feed in the developmental and regulatory pipelines.
“there are a large number of 'second generation' GE crops with altered output traits for improved livestock feed in the developmental and regulatory pipelines.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In a typical U.S. broiler operation, chickens are fed for 42–49 d on diets composed of approximately 35% soybean meal and 65% corn grain.
“in a typical U.S. broiler operation, chickens are fed for 42-49 d on diets that are composed of approximately 35% soybean meal and 65% corn grain”
The paper relies on this without support.
The average U.S. dairy cow has a productive life of 5 yr with 3 conceptions, 3 gestations, and 3 lactations.
“The average U.S. dairy cow has a productive life of 5 yr with 3 conceptions, 3 gestations, and 3 lactations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A typical U.S. dairy diet contains 50% corn silage, 20% corn grain, and 10% dehulled soybean meal.
“A typical U.S. dairy diet contains 50% corn silage, 20% corn grain, and 10% dehulled soybean meal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many cows receive large portions of their rations as ground corn grain, fuzzy cottonseed, or roasted full-fat soybeans.
“Also, many cows receive large portions of their rations as ground corn grain, fuzzy cottonseed (no processing except for removal of the lint), or roasted full-fat soybeans.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Other GE sources of animal feed include alfalfa hay, sugar beet pulp, corn distillers grains or other coproducts from corn processing, cottonseed meal, canola meal, and soy hulls.
“Other GE sources of animal feed include alfalfa hay, sugar beet pulp, corn distillers grains or other coproducts from corn processing, cottonseed meal, canola meal, and soy hulls.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A beef cow on the range might consume only some GE alfalfa hay, but her progeny entering the feedlot might be expected to consume a ration containing high quantities of GE feed during their 120 d in the feedlot before harvest.
“A beef cow on the range might consume only some GE alfalfa hay, but her progeny entering the feedlot might be expected to consume a ration containing high quantities of GE feed during their 120 d in the feedlot before harvest.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
If animal feed derived from GE crops had deleterious effects on animals consuming GE feed, then animal performance and health attributes in these large commercial livestock populations would have been negatively impacted.
“It would be reasonable to hypothesize that if animal feed derived from GE crops had deleterious effects on animals consuming GE feed, then animal performance and health attributes in these large commercial livestock populations would have been negatively impacted.”
The paper relies on this without support.
All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.
“All animals arriving at USDA-inspected slaughter facilities undergo both antemortem and postmortem inspections to identify abnormalities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.
“Carcasses are condemned postmortem if there are visible lesions or tumors present on organs and carcasses.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Animals and humans regularly ingest DNA and RNA as part of traditional diets without consequence.
“It is important to note that animals and humans regularly ingest DNA and RNA as part of traditional diets without consequence.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Approximately 9 billion broilers are processed annually in the United States.
“approximately 9 billion broilers are processed annually in the United States”
The paper relies on this without support.
Only Brazil currently requires mandatory labeling of products from animals that consume GE feed.
“only Brazil currently re -quires mandatory labeling of products from animals that consume GE feed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In some countries, mandatory food labeling regulations target the presence of GE components in the finished product (e.g., Australia, New Zealand, and Japan), whereas in other countries, regulations target foods that use GE technology as a part of the production process (e.g., the EU, Brazil, and China).
“In some countries, mandatory food labeling regulations target the presence of GE components in the finished product (e.g., Australia, New Zealand, and Japan), whereas in other countries, regulations target foods that use GE technology as a part of the production process (e.g., the EU, Brazil, and China).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The volume of traded soybeans required to be identity-preserved certified non-GE is segregated from supplies that may contain GE soybeans.
“if it is as -sumed that this volume of traded soybeans is segregated from supplies that may contain GE soybeans”
The paper relies on this without support.
Harvesting machinery and storage facilities are shared among different agricultural production systems.
“realities of agricultural production systems where harvesting machinery and storage facilities are shared among different production systems”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several groups reviewing the evidence for health hazards of genetic modification have found no evidence for harms, but methods for such evaluation remain heterogeneous.
“Several groups reviewing the evidence for health hazards of genetic modification have found no evidence for harms;130-134 however, methods for such evaluation remain heterogeneous.135-139”
From Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review (2016) · cites this paper as [134]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
GE feed crops are said to have been introduced in two different years
MinorThe paper repeatedly gives 1996 as the introduction year, but the description of Table 4 says 1986.
“Livestock production statistics for the United States before and after the introduction of GE feed crops in 1986 are summarized in Table 4.”
“The first genetically engineered ( GE ) feed crops were introduced in 1996.”
Table 7 cottonseed-meal percentage does not match its trade figures
MinorTable 7 lists 0.63 million t as the share of cottonseed-meal trade that may contain GE material and 0.6 million t as total trade. The listed share is 105% of total trade, not the reported 45%.
Reported 45 · recomputed 105
“| Percentage of global trade that may be GE | 84.4% | 45% | 64% |”
Cites
1 retracted
Séralini, G.-E., Clair, E., Mesnage, R., Gress, S., Defarge, N., Malatesta, M., Hennequin, D., & de Vendômois, J. S. (2012) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
RetractedA guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases
Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3686 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Havenstein, G., Ferket, P., & Qureshi, M. (2003) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/82.10.1500 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution
Delgado, C. L. (2003) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/133.11.3907s · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Trostle, R. (2026) · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.413173 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides
Kovach, J. K., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., & Tette, J. P. (1992) · eCommons (Cornell University) · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Ewen, S. W. B., & Pusztai, A. J. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)05860-7 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-3802 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050?
Bruinsma, J. (2009) · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding
Lusser, M., Parisi, C., Plan, D., & Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2142 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
The adoption of genetically modified cotton and poverty reduction in Pakistan
Ali, A., & Abdulai, A. (2010) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00227.x · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt ( Bacillus thuringiensis ) cotton in India
Kathage, J., & Qaim, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1203647109 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Séralini, G.-E., Clair, E., Mesnage, R., Gress, S., Defarge, N., Malatesta, M., Hennequin, D., & de Vendômois, J. S. (2014) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0014-5 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Hartung, F., & Schiemann, J. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12413 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: Lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics
Bradford, K. J., Van Deynze, A., Gutterson, N., Parrott, W., & Strauss, S. H. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1084 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Snell, C., Bernheim, A., Bergé, J.-B., Kuntz, M., Pascal, G., Paris, A., & Ricroch, A. E. (2012) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.048 · Cited by 234 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A number of long-term (of more than 90 d and up to 2 yr in duration) feeding trials and multigenerational studies conducted by public research laboratories using various animal models including pigs, cows, quail, and fish have also been reviewed (Ricroch, 2013; Ricroch et al., 2013; Snell et al., 2012).”
Background(2008) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Séralini, G.-E., Cellier, D., & de Vendomois, J. S. (2007) · Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00244-006-0149-5 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Genetically modified crops and food security
Qaim, M., & Kouser, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064879 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
The benefits of herbicide‐resistant crops
Green, J. M. (2012) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3374 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods
Dona, A., & Arvanitoyannis, I. S. (2008) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408390701855993 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2008) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2008.1057 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Transgenic maize plants expressing a fungal phytase gene
Chen, R., Xue, G., Chen, P., Yao, B., Yang, W., Ma, Q., Fan, Y., Zhao, Z., Tarczynski, M. C., & Shi, J. (2008) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-007-9138-3 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Genetically Engineered Crops: From Idea to Product
Prado, J. R., Segers, G. C., Voelker, T. A., Carson, D., Dobert, R. C., Phillips, J., Cook, K. A., Cornejo, C., Monken, J., Grapes, L., et al. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040039 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Boleman, S. L., Boleman, S. J., Morgan, W. W., Hale, D. S., Griffin, D. B., Savell, J. W., Ames, R. P., Smith, M. T., Tatum, J. D., Field, T. G., et al. (1998) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1998.76196x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Safety considerations of DNA in food
Jonas, D. A., Elmadfa, I., Engel, K.-H., Heller, K. J., Kozianowski, G., König, A., Müller, D., Narbonne, J. F., Wackernagel, W., & Kleiner, J. (2001) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000046734 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Bacterial Plasminogen Receptors: Mediators of a Multifaceted Relationship
Sanderson‐Smith, M. L., Oliveira, D. M. P. D., Ranson, M., et al. (2012) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2012/272148 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Einspanier, R., Klotz, A., Kraft, J., Aulrich, K., Poser, R., Schwägele, F., Jahreis, G., & Flachowsky, G. (2001) · European Food Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/s002170000248 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the United States
National Research Council (2010) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/12804 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Modifying crops to increase cell wall digestibility
Jung, H.-J. G., Samac, D. A., & Sarath, G. (2012) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.10.014 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
A comparison of the effects of three GM corn varieties on mammalian health
de Vendômois, J. S., Roullier, F., Cellier, D., & Séralini, G.-E. (2009) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.5.706 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Unintended compositional changes in genetically modified (GM) crops: 20 years of research
Herman, R. A., & Price, W. D. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf400135r · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Methods for detection of GMOs in food and feed
Marmiroli, N., Maestri, E., Gullì, M., Malcevschi, A., Peano, C., Bordoni, R., & Bellis, G. D. (2008) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-008-2303-6 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Giesy, J. P., Solomon, K. R., Mackay, D., & Anderson, J. C. (2014) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0029-y · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Gruère, G. (2007) · IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Huang, S., Frizzi, A., Florida, C. A., Kruger, D. E., & Luethy, M. H. (2006) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-006-0027-6 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
The Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the United States
Chen, H. (2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-2667 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
García-Villalba, R., León, C., Dinelli, G., Segura-Carretero, A., Fernández-Gutiérrez, A., Garcia-Cañas, V., & Cifuentes, A. (2008) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.018 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
The Safety of Genetically Modified Foods Produced through Biotechnology
Hollingworth, R. M., Bjeldanes, L. F., Bolger, M., et al. (2003) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/71.1.2 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Brookes, G. R., & Barfoot, P. (2014) · GM crops & food · doi:10.4161/gmcr.28098 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Aumaitre, A., Aulrich, K., Chesson, A., Flachowsky, G., & Piva, G. (2002) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(02)00016-7 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Malatesta, M., Caporaloni, C., Gavaudan, S., Rocchi, M. B. L., Serafini, S., Tiberi, C., & Gazzanelli, G. (2002) · Cell Structure and Function · doi:10.1247/csf.27.173 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Economic and agronomic impact of commercialized GM crops: a meta-analysis
AREAL, F. J., RIESGO, L., & RODRÍGUEZ-CEREZO, E. (2013) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859612000111 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Comparative regulatory approaches for groups of new plant breeding techniques
Lusser, M., & Davies, H. V. (2013) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2013.02.004 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST)
Pass, B. C. (1979) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/25.3.206 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Beever, D. E., & Kemp, C. (2000) · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Kılıç, A., & Akay, M. T. (2008) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.11.016 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Holst-Jensen, A., De Loose, M., & Van den Eede, G. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf052849a · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Huang, J., Mi, J., Lin, H., Wang, Z., Chen, R., Hu, R., Rozelle, S., & Pray, C. (2010) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-010-4036-y · Cited by 89 · see citing works
A long-term study on female mice fed on a genetically modified soybean: effects on liver ageing
Malatesta, M., Boraldi, F., Annovi, G., Baldelli, B., Battistelli, S., Biggiogera, M., & Quaglino, D. (2008) · Histochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1007/s00418-008-0476-x · Cited by 88 · see citing works
How safe does transgenic food need to be?
DeFrancesco, L. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2686 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Assessment of GE food safety using ‘-omics’ techniques and long-term animal feeding studies
Ricroch, A. (2012) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2012.12.001 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
How to deal with the upcoming challenges in GMO detection in food and feed
Broeders, S. R. M., De Keersmaecker, S. C. J., & Roosens, N. H. C. (2012) · Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology · doi:10.1155/2012/402418 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Walsh, M. C., Buzoianu, S. G., Gardiner, G. E., Rea, M. C., Gelencsér, E., Jánosi, A., Epstein, M. M., Ross, R. P., & Lawlor, P. G. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027177 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Malatesta, M., Biggiogera, M., Manuali, E., & Rocchi, M. (2009) · European Journal of Histochemistry · doi:10.4081/851 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Cheng, K. C., Beaulieu, J., Iquira, E., Belzile, F. J., Fortin, M. G., & Strömvik, M. V. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf073505i · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Petersson, E. V., Arif, U., Schulzova, V., Krtková, V., Hajšlová, J., Meijer, J., Andersson, H. C., Jonsson, L., & Sitbon, F. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf400318p · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Alexander, T. W., Reuter, T., Aulrich, K., Sharma, R., Okine, E. K., Dixon, W. T., & McAllister, T. A. (2006) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.003 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet
Carman, J. A., Vlieger, H. R., Steeg, L., Sneller, V.-P., Robinson, G. W., Clinch‐Jones, C. A., Haynes, J. I., & Edwards, J. W. (2013) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Brake, D. G., & Evenson, D. P. (2003) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2003.08.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Ultrastructural analysis of pancreatic acinar cells from mice fed on genetically modified soybean
Malatesta, M., Caporaloni, C., Rossi, L., Battistelli, S., Rocchi, M. B. L., Tonucci, F., & Gazzanelli, G. (2002) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1046/j.0021-8782.2002.00103.x · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Arjó, G., Portero, M., Piñol, C., Viñas, J., Matias-Guiu, X., Capell, T., Bartholomaeus, A., Parrott, W., & Christou, P. (2013) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-013-9692-9 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Bartholomaeus, A., Parrott, W., Bondy, G., Walker, K., & on behalf of the ILSI International Food Biotechnology Committee Task Force on the Use of Mammalian Toxicology Studies in the Safety Assessment of GM Foods (2013) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2013.842955 · Cited by 59 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The difficulties associated with the safety and nutritional testing of whole foods/feed derived from GE crops, which contain thousands of bioactive substances, are well known (reviewed in Bartholomaeus et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialWalsh, M. C., Buzoianu, S. G., Gardiner, G. E., Rea, M. C., Ross, R. P., Cassidy, J. P., & Lawlor, P. G. (2011) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114511003011 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Buzoianu, S. G., Walsh, M. C., Rea, M. C., O’Donovan, Ó., Gelencsér, É., Ujhelyi, G., Szabó, E., Nagy, A., Ross, R. P., Gardiner, G. E., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047851 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Key global environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2012
Barfoot, P., & Brookes, G. (2014) · GM crops & food · doi:10.4161/gmcr.28449 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
White, T. L., & Moore, D. A. (2009) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.235.8.937 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Buzoianu, S. G., Walsh, M. C., Rea, M. C., O’Sullivan, Ó., Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P., Gardiner, G. E., & Lawlor, P. G. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00307-12 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Authority, E. F. S. (2012) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2986 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flachowsky, G., Schafft, H., & Meyer, U. (2012) · Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit · doi:10.1007/s00003-012-0777-9 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Reversibility of hepatocyte nuclear modifications in mice fed on genetically modified soybean.
Malatesta, M., Tiberi, C., Baldelli, B., Battistelli, S., Manuali, E., & Biggiogera, M. (2005) · PubMed · doi:10.4081/950 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Walsh, M. C., Buzoianu, S. G., Rea, M. C., O’Donovan, Ó., Gelencsér, É., Ujhelyi, G., Ross, R. P., Gardiner, G. E., & Lawlor, P. G. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036141 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Potential economic impacts of zero thresholds for unapproved GMOs: The EU case
Kalaitzandonakes, N., Kaufman, J., & Miller, D. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.06.013 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
GM soybeans and health safety—a controversy reexamined
Marshall, A. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0907-981 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Experience from use of GMOs in Argentinian agriculture, economy and environment
Burachik, M. (2010) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.011 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Guertler, P., Paul, V., Steinke, K., Wiedemann, S., Preißinger, W., Albrecht, C., Spiekers, H., Schwarz, F. J., & Meyer, H. H. D. (2010) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.04.010 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Rhee, G. S., Cho, D. H., Won, Y.-H., Seok, J. H., Kim, S. S., Kwack, S. J., Lee, R. D., Chae, S. Y., Kim, J. W., Lee, B. M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health · doi:10.1080/15287390500182446 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The Effect of Feeding Bt MON810 Maize to Pigs for 110 Days on Intestinal Microbiota
Buzoianu, S. G., Walsh, M. C., Rea, M. C., O’Sullivan, Ó., Crispie, F., Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P., Gardiner, G. E., & Lawlor, P. G. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033668 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Steinke, K., Guertler, P., Paul, V., Wiedemann, S., Ettle, T., Albrecht, C., Meyer, H. H. D., Spiekers, H., & Schwarz, F. J. (2010) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01003.x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kuiper, H. A., Kok, E. J., & Davies, H. V. (2013) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12091 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Sustainability of US organic beef and dairy production systems: Soil, plant and cattle interactions
Hafla, A., MacAdam, J., & Soder, K. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5073009 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies
McHughen, A. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0707-725 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Detection of genetically modified DNA sequences in milk from The Italian market
Agodi, A., Barchitta, M., Grillo, A., & Sciacca, S. (2006) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.08.005 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
New feeds from genetically modified plants: the US approach to safety for animals and the food chain
Faust, M. A. (2002) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(02)00017-9 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the United States
Plencovich, M. C. (2012) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2012.707068 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Buzoianu, S. G., Walsh, M. C., Rea, M. C., Cassidy, J. P., Ross, R. P., Gardiner, G. E., & Lawlor, P. G. (2012) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731112000249 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Safety of Meat, Milk, and Eggs from Animals Fed Crops Derived from Modern Biotechnology
CAST (2006) · doi:10.62300/mbq1l3sf · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Buzoianu, S. G., Walsh, M. C., Rea, M. C., Cassidy, J. P., Ryan, T., Ross, R. P., Gardiner, G. E., & Lawlor, P. G. (2012) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5360 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
GMOs in animal agriculture: time to consider both costs and benefits in regulatory evaluations
Eenennaam, A. L. V. (2013) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/2049-1891-4-37 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetically Modified Feeds in Poultry Diet: Safety, Performance, and Product Quality
Tufarelli, V., Selvaggi, M., Dario, C., & Laudadio, V. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2012.667017 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Novel GM animal technologies and their governance
Bruce, A., Castle, D. G. A., Gibbs, C., Tait, J., & Whitelaw, B. (2013) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-013-9724-5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Bertheau, Y., Helbling, J. C., Fortabat, M. N., Makhzami, S., Sotinel, I., Audéon, C., Nignol, A. C., Kobilinsky, A., Petit, L., Fach, P., et al. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf802262c · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Walsh, M. C., Buzoianu, S. G., Gardiner, G. E., Rea, M. C., O’Donovan, Ó., Ross, R. P., & Lawlor, P. G. (2012) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512002607 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Buzoianu, S. G., Walsh, M. C., Rea, M. C., et al. (2013) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02937-13 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Guertler, P., Brandl, C., MEYER, H. H. D., & Tichopád, A. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety · doi:10.1007/s00003-012-0778-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Serious inadequacies regarding the pathology data presented in the paper by Séralini et al. (2012)
Schorsch, F. (2013) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2012.10.043 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Lamb, E. G., & Booker, H. (2011) · Seed Science Research · doi:10.1017/s0960258511000213 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The fate of transgenic DNA and newly expressed proteins
Einspanier, R. (2013) · Animal nutrition with transgenic plants · doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0130 · Cited by 10 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed Studies have concluded that animals do not digest transgenic and native plant DNA differently and that rDNA from GE crops has not been detected in animal products (Einspanier, 2013).”
BackgroundFeeding animals with GM crops: Boon or bane?
Deb, R., Sajjanar, B., Devi, K. V., et al. (2013) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The pipeline of GM crops for improved animal feed: Challenges for commercial use
Tillie, P., Dillen, K., & Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. (2013) · Animal nutrition with transgenic plants · doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0166 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Natural genotypes via genetic engineering
Wells, K. D. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1315623110 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Rickard, C. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408390903467787 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Economic impact of GM hysteria on EU feed market
Popp, J., Pető, K., Magda, R., & Lakner, Z. (2013) · American Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.4236/ajps.2013.48186 · Cited by 7 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In 2013, 4 major United Kingdom food supermarket groups—Tesco, Cooperative, Marks and Spencer, and Sainsbury’s—ceased requiring that poultry and egg suppliers use only non-GE feed (Popp et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialFeeding studies with firstgeneration GM plants (input traits) with food-producing animals.
Flachowsky, G. (2013) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0072 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Long-term and multi-generational animal feeding studies.
Ricroch, A., Berheim, A., Snell, C., et al. (2013) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0112 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
GMOs in animal agriculture: time to consider both costs and benefits in regulatory evaluations
Alison, van, & Eenennaam (2014) · Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The structural evolution of organic farms in the USA: the international market effect
Grow, S., & Greene, C. (2009) · Wageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.3920/9789086866618_016 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
12 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- European Feed Manufacturers' Federation, 2013, XXVI FEFAC congress 2013, The feed chain in action.
- European Food Safety Authority, 2011, Opinion of the scientific committee/scientific panel. Statistical significance and biological relevance, EFSA J., 9, 2372
- International Life Sciences Institute, 2007, Best practices for the conduct of animal studies to evaluate crops genetically modified for output traits
- James, 2013, Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013
- Velmirov, 2008, Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603xMON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in mice, Bundesministerium fur Gesundheit, Familie und Jugend.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mozaffarian, D. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.018585 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
Lucht, J. M. (2015) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v7082819 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
“The large majority of soy-based animal feed in the EU, thus, contains genetically modified components [10].”
BackgroundMicrobial and genetically engineered oils as replacements for fish oil in aquaculture feeds
Sprague, M., Betancor, M. B., & Tocher, D. R. (2017) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1007/s10529-017-2402-6 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
“It is thought that around 90% of soybeans traded globally contain GM material and, as such, a large proportion of animal feed available in the EU already contains GM components (Lucht 2015; Van Eenennaam and Young 2014).”
BackgroundFish nutrition research: past, present and future
Jobling, M. (2015) · Aquaculture International · doi:10.1007/s10499-014-9875-2 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
“…and books that aimed to inform about the advances in fish nutrition followed suit (e.g. Halver 1989; Wilson 1991; NRC 1993, 2011; Hertrampf and Piedad-Pascual 2000; Houlihan et al. 2001; Halver and Hardy 2002; Webster and Lim 2002; Holt 2011; Turchini et al. 2011; Merrifield and Ringø 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialNew GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology
Davison, J., & Ammann, K. (2017) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2017.1289305 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
“At this moment there are no international discussions on this subject of global regulation despite years-long pressing Masip G. et al. (Van Eenennaam and Young, 2014), PRRI (Gupta, 2000).”
BackgroundSustainable ruminant production to help feed the planet
Pulina, G., Francesconi, A. H. D., Stefanon, B., Sevi, A., Calamari, L., Lacetera, N., DELL’ORTO, V., Pilla, F., Ajmone‐Marsan, P., Mele, M. L., et al. (2016) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1080/1828051x.2016.1260500 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“At a global level, it has been estimated that foodproducing animals use from 70% to 90% of the GM crop biomass (Van Eenennaam & Young 2014), derived mainly from soybean, maize, cottonseed and rapeseed.”
BackgroundInvited review: Sustainable forage and grain crop production for the US dairy industry
Martin, N. P., Russelle, M. P., Powell, J. M., Sniffen, C. J., Smith, S., Tricárico, J. M., & Grant, R. J. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13080 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“In 2013, genetically engineered varieties were planted on more than 95% of sugar beet, 93% of soybean, and 90% of cotton and corn acres in the United States (Van Eenennaam and Young, 2014).”
BackgroundSinger, S. D., Hannoufa, A., & Acharya, S. N. (2017) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.13090 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Feed: Is There Any Difference From Food?
Giraldo, P. A., Shinozuka, H., SPANGENBERG, G. C., Cogan, N. O. I., & Smith, K. F. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01592 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“However, a detailed molecular characterization of the transgene insertion, development of tracking and tracing methodologies to ensure legality and traceability, and environmental studies to enable coexistence frameworks, are common studies in the safety assessment of GM crops (Van Haver et al., 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialA risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms
Conko, G., Kershen, D. L., Miller, H. I., & Parrott, W. A. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3568 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Nawaz, M. A., Mesnage, R., Tsatsakis, A. M., Golokhvast, K. S., Yang, S. H., Antoniou, M. N., & Chung, G. (2018) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2018.12.030 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Glyphosate-based herbicide formulations and reproductive toxicity in animals
Jarrell, Z. R., Ahammad, M. U., & Benson, A. P. (2020) · Veterinary and Animal Science · doi:10.1016/j.vas.2020.100126 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Safety assessment of foods from genetically modified crops in countries with developing economies
Delaney, B. (2015) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2015.10.001 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Caradus, J. R. (2022) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2022.2141273 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Lambo, M. T., Ma, H., Zhang, H., et al. (2023) · Animal nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2023.10.003 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Horizontal gene transfer from genetically modified plants - Regulatory considerations
Philips, J. G., Avila, E. M., & Robold, A. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.971402 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Tepper, K., Edwards, O. R., Sunna, A., Paulsen, I. T., & Maselko, M. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06516-8 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“For example, food crops genetically engineered to improve productivityinthe fi eldareinexpensivesourcesofanimalfeed 79 andenzyme supplements used to improve digestibility are sourced from genetically engineered microbes 77 .”
BackgroundMethodFood and Feed Safety of Genetically Engineered Food Crops
Delaney, B., Goodman, R. E., & Ladics, G. S. (2017) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfx249 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Santis, B. D., Stockhofe, N., Wal, J. M., Weesendorp, E., Lallès, J. P., van Dijk, J. P., Kok, E. J., Giacomo, M. D., Einspanier, R., Onori, R., et al. (2017) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.033 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Wu, P., Guo, Y., Golly, M. K., Ma, H., He, R., Luo, S., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., & Zhu, J. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9542 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Bedair, M., & Glenn, K. C. (2020) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-020-01733-8 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Vincelli, P. C. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8050495 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“The weight of the evidence in favor of safety of crop improvement using GE is overwhelming, as reflected in the position statements of diverse, prestigious scientific societies [148–163]; scientific review papers [164–171], and hundreds of peer-reviewed research papers.”
BackgroundBreaking through the feed barrier: options for improving forage genetics
Barrett, B. A., Faville, M. J., Nichols, S. N., Simpson, W. R., Bryan, G. T., & Conner, A. J. (2015) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an14833 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Meta-analysis of over 100 billion animals, including several long-term (>90- day) and multi-generational studies pre- and post-introduction of GM feeds, has revealed no adverse effects on ruminant productivity or health attributable to GM (Van Eenennaam and Young 2014).”
BackgroundGlyphosate in livestock: feed residues and animal health1
Vicini, J. L., Reeves, W., Swarthout, J. T., & Karberg, K. A. (2019) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skz295 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The Role of Biofuels Coproducts in Feeding the World Sustainably
Shurson, G. C. (2016) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-022516-022907 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants
Caradus, J. R. (2023) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2023.2252947 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“6,12 It has been argued that in Europe where gene editing of crops were initially automatically classified as GM and regulated accordingly due to it requiring the use of recombinant nucleic acid techniques ignored the fact that “pro-ducts of certain GE (GEd) techniques are in several cases…”
BackgroundWu, P., Golly, M. K., Guo, Y., Ma, H., He, R., Luo, X., Luo, S., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., & Zhu, J. (2020) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114616 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Smyth, S. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.863193 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Current and Future Improvements in Livestock Nutrition and Feed Resources
Tona, G. O. (2018) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.73088 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Characterization of scientific studies usually cited as evidence of adverse effects of GM food/feed
Sánchez, M., & Parrott, W. A. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12798 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Furthermore, it has been noted that over 100 billion animals have consumed GM feed with no unfavourable or perturbed trends in animal health and productivity (Van Eenennaam and Young, 2014).”
BackgroundChallenges for Plant Breeders from the View of Animal Nutrition
Flachowsky, G., & Meyer, U. (2015) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture5041252 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Various types of animal feeding studies, such as measuring digestibility/bioavailability; efficiency studies including the transfer of nutrients from feed into food of animal origin as well as long-term and multi-generational feeding studies with feeds resulting from plant breeding have been described by many organisa…”
BackgroundRemoving politics from innovations that improve food security
Smyth, S. J., McHughen, A., Entine, J., Kershen, D. L., Ramage, C., & Parrott, W. A. (2021) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-021-00261-y · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Comparative analysis of detection techniques for glyphosate in urine and in water
Vélot, C., Poitou, F., & de Vendômois, J. S. (2022) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-022-00637-9 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“This is more relevant as most animals raised in intensive farming are fed with soycakes made from such GM soybeans [11, 12] mainly grown in the United States, Brazil and Argentina [5].”
BackgroundHMEJ-mediated efficient site-specific gene integration in chicken cells
Xie, L., Sun, J., Mo, L., Xu, T., Shahzad, Q., Chen, D., Yang, W., Liao, Y., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-019-0217-9 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Rausser, G. C., Zilberman, D., & Kahn, G. (2015) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012549 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Regulation of genome edited technologies in India
Chimata, M. K., & Bharti, G. (2019) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-019-00148-z · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Quality control of feed ingredients for aquaculture
Tangendjaja, B. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100506-4.00006-4 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Detection of dietary DNA, protein, and glyphosate in meat, milk, and eggs1
Eenennaam, A. L. V., & Young, A. E. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2016.1346 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationRisk-Only Assessment of Genetically Engineered Crops Is Risky
Herman, R. A., Zhuang, M., Storer, N. P., Cnudde, F., & Delaney, B. (2018) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2018.10.001 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Planting seeds for the future of food
Green, H., Broun, P., Çakmak, İ., et al. (2015) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.7554 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons
Panchin, A. Y., & Tuzhikov, A. I. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Bacillus velezensis DP ‐2 isolated from Douchi and its application in soybean meal fermentation
Liu, Z., Guan, X., Zhong, X., Zhou, X., & Yang, F. (2020) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.10801 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Baghbani-Arani, A., Poureisa, M., Alekajbaf, H., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88713-7 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Zhu, H., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Wang, J., Ding, J., Chen, X., & Peng, Y. (2015) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf5055547 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
How scary! An analysis of visual communication concerning genetically modified organisms in Italy
Ventura, V., Frisio, D. G., Ferrazzi, G., & Siletti, E. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516638634 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Animal nutrition with transgenic plants
(2013) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0000 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Development of a construct-based risk assessment framework for genetic engineered crops
Beker, M. P., Boari, P., Burachik, M., Cuadrado, V., Junco, M., Lede, S., Lema, M. A., Lewi, D. M., Maggi, A., Meoniz, I., et al. (2016) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-016-9955-3 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“This approach is also supported by evidence indicating that insertional effects associated with GE techniques are not different to the genetic changes that occur in conventionally bred plants and therefore should represent similar levels of risk (Weber et al. 2012; Van der Wiel et al. 2010; Kobayashi et al. 2004; EFSA…”
BackgroundInfluentialCurrent and future uses of genetic improvement technologies in livestock breeding programs
Eenennaam, A. L. V. (2024) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.1093/af/vfae042 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationDP-2Ø2216-6 maize does not adversely affect rats in a 90-day feeding study
Carlson, A. B., Mukerji, P., Mathesius, C. A., Huang, E., Herman, R. A., Hoban, D., Thurman, J. D., & Roper, J. M. (2020) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104779 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Huang, X., Li, H., Han, T., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1226988 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Nguyen, T. H., Taieb, S. B., Moritaka, M., & Fukuda, S. (2022) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2022.2037487 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“For instance, Van Eenennaam and Young (2014) reported that 85% of imported soybeans in Europe are GM products.”
BackgroundSingle-Event Transgene Product Levels Predict Levels in Genetically Modified Breeding Stacks
Gampala, S. S., Fast, B. J., Richey, K. A., Gao, Z., Hill, R. C., Wulfkuhle, B., Shan, G., Bradfisch, G. A., & Herman, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03098 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Lisha, V., New, C. Y., Nishibuchi, M., et al. (2017) · Food Research · doi:10.26656/fr.2017.1.001 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“According to Van Eenennaam and Young (2014), the available data for health and production parameters across commercial poultry, dairy, beef and hogs showed no significant deleterious health with the consumption of GMO animal feed.”
BackgroundMesnage, R., Arno, M. J., Séralini, G., & Antoniou, M. N. (2017) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-017-0105-1 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“While advocates put forward evidences, which they suggest prove their safety [2, 3], others provide evidence-based arguments that show a lack of a scientific consensus on the safety of genetically modified (GM) foodstuffs [4].”
BackgroundFuture challenges feeding transgenic plants
Flachowsky, G., & Reuter, T. (2017) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.2527/af.2017.0114 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“In conclusion, a number of reviews summarized (e.g., Flachowsky, 2013; Van Eenennaam and Young, 2014) that the feeds and foods from first-generation GM crops are safe and can be rated equivalent to their conventional counterparts as modified feeds revealed no significant impact on the composition…”
BackgroundInfluentialFood and feed safety of DAS-444Ø6-6 herbicide-tolerant soybean
Herman, R. A., Ekmay, R. D., Schafer, B. W., Song, P., Fast, B. J., Papineni, S., Shan, G., & Juberg, D. R. (2018) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.016 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Putnam, D. H., Woodward, T., Reisen, P., et al. (2016) · Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management · doi:10.2134/cftm2015.0164 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Smith, K. F., & SPANGENBERG, G. C. (2016) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy6040059 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“The majority (70%–90%) of these GM crops are used for animal feed [2] with up to 95% of the 9 billion animals grown for food production each year in the USA consuming diets containing GM ingredients [2].”
BackgroundResultIndia Needs Genetic Modification Technology in Agriculture
Datta, S., Dhillon, B., Gautam, P. L., et al. (2019) · Current Science · doi:10.18520/cs/v117/i3/390-394 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Petrick, J. S., Bell, E., & Koch, M. S. (2019) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2019.1680242 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Enlightened oversight of genetically engineered crops for the next generation
Herman, R. A., Gaffney, J., & Storer, N. P. (2020) · Agricultural & Environmental Letters · doi:10.1002/ael2.20004 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“We have now been using modern GE techniques to safely enhance commercial crop varieties for a quarter of a century (ISAAA, 2018; Romeis, Naranjo, Meissle, & Shelton, 2019; Van Eenennaam & Young, 2014).”
MethodComprehension of Products and Messages
Cummings, C. L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50530-5_8 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A dinâmica dos canais curtos de comercialização: o caso do Projeto Campagna Amica na Itália
dos Anjos, F. S., & Caldas, N. V. (2017) · Sociedade e Estado · doi:10.1590/s0102-69922017.32030010 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Gene Editing for Enhanced Swine Production: Current Advances and Prospects
Ju, W. S., Kim, S., Lee, J.-Y., Lee, H., No, J.-G., Lee, S., & Oh, K. B. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15030422 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The current regulatory status of biotechnologically bred crops in Canada and beyond
Singer, S. D., & Michaud, D. (2025) · Genome · doi:10.1139/gen-2025-0008 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Morera, P., Basiricò, L., Ronchi, B., & Bernabucci, U. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2015-0025 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Carry-over of DNA from genetically modified soyabean and maize to cow’s milk
Giacomo, M. D., Domenicantonio, C. D., Santis, B. D., Debegnach, F., Onori, R., & Brera, C. (2016) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/65570/2016 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…bacteria harbouring the animal gastrointestinal tract, and as a consequence might be risky for the humans as final consumers (EFSA, 2007, 2009; ADAS, 2013; Van Eenennaam and Young, 2014; MARLON PROJECT (‘Monitoring of Animals for Feed-related Risks in the Long Term’, FP7-KBBE-2012-6-singlestage).”
BackgroundUntargeted Metabolomics Are Not Useful in the Risk Assessment of GM Crops
Delaney, B., Hazebroek, J. P., Herman, R. A., Juberg, D. R., & Storer, N. P. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.03.002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The impact of GM crops on agriculture
Schulman, A. H. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817240-7.00012-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Genetically modified crops: the truth unveiled
Gruissem, W. (2015) · Agriculture & Food Security · doi:10.1186/s40066-015-0022-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Nevertheless, after a large-scale study that found no impact of GM feedstuffs on livestock populations [8], John Entine in the magazine Forbes recently declared ‘The debate about GMO safety is over’ [9].”
BackgroundFood from Genetically Engineered Plants
D’Ambrosio, C., Stigliani, A. L., & Giorio, G. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802259-7.00033-6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sharbati, J., Bohmer, M., Bohmer, N., Keller, A., Backes, C., Franke, A., Steinberg, P., Zeljenková, D., & Einspanier, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2017.00222 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…hypotheses, and adequate positive controls – for unforeseen effects – are not available, as most of the frequently published feeding studies never showed deleterious effects when feeding commercialized GM material to animals (for reviews see (Snell et al., 2012; Van Eenennaam and Young, 2014).”
BackgroundChen, L., Sun, Z., Liu, Q., Zhong, R., Tan, S., Yang, X., & Zhang, H. (2016) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.7624 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Public opinion toward GMOs and biotechnology in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bevanda, L., Žilić, M., Ećimović, B., & Matković, V. (2017) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_70 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Promise, problems and prospects: agri-biotech governance in China, India and Japan
Ma, J., Gilmour, B. W., & Dang, H. (2017) · China Agricultural Economic Review · doi:10.1108/caer-02-2017-0028 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Storer, N. P., Simmons, A. R., Sottosanto, J. B., Anderson, J. A. H., Huang, M. H., Mahadeo, D. A., Mathesius, C. A., da Rocha, M. S., Song, S., & Ewa Urbanczyk-wochniak, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1394704 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
McNaughton, J., Roberts, M., Smith, B., Carlson, A. B., Mathesius, C. A., Roper, J. M., Zimmermann, C., Walker, C., Huang, E., & Herman, R. A. (2020) · The Journal of Applied Poultry Research · doi:10.1016/j.japr.2020.05.004 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Vicini, J. L. (2017) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.2527/af.2017.0113 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Moral Issues in the Natural Sciences and Technologies
van den Heever, J., & Jones, C. (2019) · doi:10.4102/aosis.2019.bk114 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Is co‐existence and/or containment of genetically modified plants possible, and is it important?
Caradus, J. R. (2025) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2025.2479724 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
GM crops: not the science but the regulatory policy is the problem
MONTAGU, M. V. (2016) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2016.1124.1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Transgenic food crops: public acceptance and IPR
Kiran, U., & Pandey, N. K. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818632-9.00012-5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Genetic Engineering and Transgenic Breeding
Ríos, R. O. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20532-8_7 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Chen, L., Zhong, R., Zhang, L., & Zhang, H. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7030092 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Blair, R. M., & Regenstein, J. M. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817240-7.00005-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flachowsky, G., & Meyer, U. (2015) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/65610/2015 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…animal feeding studies with tar- get animal species to evaluate the nutritional effects and safety of the changes induced in the plants (Flachowsky, 2013; Van Eenennaam and Young, 2014) • cooperation between plant breeders and animal nutritionists in the early stages of breeding programmes.”
BackgroundMukerji, P., Rudgers, G. W., Gibson, C., et al. (2020) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104712 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Biotechnology for Sustainable Production of Food
Yusuf Chisti, B. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823960-5.00089-5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Pexas, G., Kyriazakis, I., & Doherty, B. (2023) · doi:10.46756/sci.fsa.gzi586 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Institute of Resilient Communities
Vetter, K. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58768-4_16 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Not only is a large portion of the animal feed in the US already genetically modified [12] without any obvious effect, GMOs need to play a critical role in addressing the enormous and expanding malnutrition in many developing countries specifically in Africa or India [13].”
Regulating Safety of Novel Food and Genetically Modified Crops
Bartholomaeus, A. (2018) · Advances in botanical research · doi:10.1016/bs.abr.2017.11.003 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zhong, R., Zhang, L., Chen, L., Yang, X., & Zhang, H. (2020) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.10596 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Clark, L. C., Eisemann, J. D., Godwin, J., Horak, K., Oh, K. P., O’Hare, J. R., Piaggio, A. J., Pepin, K., & Ruell, E. W. (2020) · Topics in biodiversity and conservation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“2019; Van Eenennaam and Young 2014).”
Overcoming Obstacles to Gene-Edited Solutions to Climate ChallengesPreprint
Giddings, L. V. (2023) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041677 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“In its most recent proposals to ensure the safety of plants and animals improved through gene editing, the FDA has adopted a “ guilty until proven innocent ” approach that fl ies in the face of reason and experience (Van Eenennaam and Young 2014; Giddings 2017a,b).”
Boora, N., Ahlawat, Y. K., Chaudhary, D., Jaiwal, P. K., & Kundu, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-0309-4_14 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
MacDonald, R. S., & Reitmeier, C. A. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804445-2.00003-x · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Murray, J. D., & Maga, E. A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92348-2_8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Gupta, P. (2018) · Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research · doi:10.32474/ciacr.2018.01.000110 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“All such studies were questioned for the material and methodology used and for the inferences drawn [8].”
BackgroundAssessing the fate of recombinant plant DNA in rabbit’s tissues fed genetically modified cotton
Shahıd, A. A., Salisu, I. B., Yaqoob, A., Rao, A. Q., Ullah, I., & Husnaın, T. (2019) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/jpn.13243 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Glyphosate in poultry production: health risks, toxicity, and environmental impact
Fathi, M. A., Allam, A. A., Rudayni, H. A., Alawam, A. S., Taha, A. E.-S., & Elnesr, S. S. (2025) · World s Poultry Science Journal · doi:10.1080/00439339.2025.2542410 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“GM crops play a significant role in animal feed, particularly for poultry (Van Eenennaam and Young 2014), which heavily relies on corn and soybean-based diets.”
- Authors
- Van Eenennaam, A. L., & Young, A. E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616
- University of California, Davis (US)
- ORCID
- Young, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-10-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4255-4278
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2087980057
- Semantic Scholar
- 4ae01b48020041b54eddccee0ec80aa0b56c70eb
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Keywords
- livestock performance, livestock health, genome editing, international regulatory harmonization, animal feed
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Breeding, Edible Grain, Eggs, Female, Genetic Engineering, Meat, Milk, Pregnancy, Prevalence, DNA, Plant, Pregnancy Rate, Livestock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review