Inhibiting a promiscuous GPCR: iterative discovery of bitter taste receptor ligands
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The human GPCR family comprises circa 800 members, activated by hundreds of thousands of compounds. Bitter taste receptors, TAS2Rs, constitute a large and distinct subfamily, expressed orally and extra-orally and involved in physiological and pathological conditions. TAS2R14 is the most promiscuous member, with over 150 agonists and 3 antagonists known prior to this study. Due to the scarcity of inhibitors and to the importance of chemical probes for exploring TAS2R14 functions, we aimed to discover new ligands for this receptor, with emphasis on antagonists. To cope with the lack of experimental structure of the receptor, we used a mixed experimental/computational methodology which iteratively improved the performance of the predicted structure. The increasing number of active compounds, obtained here through experimental screening of FDA-approved drug library, and through chemically synthesized flufenamic acid derivatives, enabled the refinement of the binding pocket, which in turn improved the structure-based virtual screening reliability. This mixed approach led to the identification of 10 new antagonists and 200 new agonists of TAS2R14, illustrating the untapped potential of rigorous medicinal chemistry for TAS2Rs. 9% of the ~ 1800 pharmaceutical drugs here tested activate TAS2R14, nine of them at sub-micromolar concentrations. The iterative framework suggested residues involved in the activation process, is suitable for expanding bitter and bitter-masking chemical space, and is applicable to other promiscuous GPCRs lacking experimental structures.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.
Mysinger, M. M., Carchia, M., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300687e · Cited by 2,412 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Fierro, F., Peri, L., Hübner, H., Tabor-Schkade, A., Waterloo, L., Löber, S., Pfeiffer, T., Weikert, D., Dingjan, T., Margulis, E., Gmeiner, P., & Niv, M. Y.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gmeiner, Peter
- Niv, Masha Y
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 114-114
- ISSN
- 1420-682X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9071
- PMC
- PMC11072104
- OpenAlex
- W4362521782
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GM 13/12)
- Lady Davis Fellowship Trust, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- Israel Science Foundation (494/16)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Keywords
- TAS2R14, bitter taste receptors, GPCR antagonists, GPCR agonists, structure-based virtual screening, chemical probes
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Ligands, Protein Binding, Taste, Reproducibility of Results, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review