Cited by 43Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPublic Health Policies and Education

Advertising bans as a means of tobacco control policy: a systematic literature review of time-series analyses

Quentin, Wilm, Neubauer, Simone, Leidl, Reiner, König, Hans-Helmut·2007·International Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives This paper reviews the international literature that employed time-series analysis to evaluate the effects of advertising bans on aggregate consumption of cigarettes or tobacco.Methods A systematic search of the literature was conducted. Three groups of studies representing analyses of advertising bans in the U.S.A., in other countries and in 22 OECD countries were defined. The estimated effects of advertising bans and their significance were analysed.Results 24 studies were identified. They used a wide array of explanatory variables, models, estimating methods and data sources. 18 studies found a negative effect of an advertising ban on aggregate consumption, but only ten of these studies found a significant effect. Two studies using data from 22 OECD countries suggested that partial bans would have little or no influence on aggregate consumption, whereas complete bans would significantly reduce consumption.Conclusions The results imply that advertising bans have a negative but sometimes only narrow impact on consumption. Complete bans let expect a higher effectiveness. Because of methodological restrictions of analysing advertising bans' effects by time series approaches, also different approaches should be used in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00038-007-5131-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 43

Authors
Quentin, W., Neubauer, S., Leidl, R., & König, H.-H.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
König, Hans-Helmut
Venue
International Journal of Public Health
Published
2007-10
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
295-307
ISSN
  • 0303-8408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1661-8556
  • 1420-911X
OpenAlex
W2043483668
Cited by
43
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
tobacco advertising ban, tobacco control, cigarette consumption, smoking prevalence, advertising regulation, time series analysis, OECD countries
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Advertising, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Smoking, United States, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review