The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexting als Risiko?: Zum konsensuellen und nichtkonsensuellen Versand persönlicher erotischer Fotos mittels digitaler Medien
Abstract
Background Digital media are used for the purpose of various sexual experiences. In recent years the exchange of erotic text messages or images ("sexting") has gained the attention of academic research and has increasingly been the center of public discussion on sexual boundary violations and violence via digital media. The unwanted forwarding of images to a third party is especially relevant in this respect. In contrast to media reports about sexting as a risk behavior with serious consequences, there is little empirical analysis about the actual sexting practice of adolescents and adults in Germany. Objective This paper is the first to describe sexting behavior of young adults in Germany on the basis of a large representative student sample. Material and methods Data were collected in 2012 in the course of a nationwide study. Students from 15 universities were asked among other things about their experiences with sending erotic text messages or images, the non-consensual forwarding of images and its consequences. Results More than half of the student sample reported sending erotic text messages, 26.8% of women and 16.8% of men had sent erotic images to someone, in most cases to their partner. Of the sexters, 2% mentioned that their images had been forwarded to another person without their consent. Conclusion The results indicate that in Germany sexting is mostly practiced in the context of a romantic relationship. Only a small percentage experience unwanted forwarding of images, and negative consequences are not reported for all incidents; however, this does not relativize the impact of those events implicating serious negative consequences for the involved person.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We ran the search again in Scopus excluding English publications to discover how many studies were excluded, finding that there was only one study that we did not include because it was in German and not in English (Dekker & Koops, 2017).”
From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Dekker & Koops, 2017
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Dekker A, Koops T, Briken P (2016) Sexualisierte Grenzverletzungen und Gewalt mittels digitaler Medien. Expertise zur Bedeutung digitaler Medien für Phänomene sexualisierter Grenzverletzungen und Gewalt gegen Kinder und Jugendliche. Unabhängiger Beauftragter für Fragen des sexuellen Kindesmissbrauchs, Berlin
- Ospina M, Harstall C, Dennett L (2010) Sexual exploitation of children and youth over the internet: a rapid review of the scientific literature. Edmonton: Institute of Health Economics. http://www.ihe.ca/download/sexual_exploitation_of_children_and_youth_over_the_internet_a_rapid_review_of_the_scientific_literature.pdf . Zugegriffen: 27. Febr. 2017
- Döring N (2012) Erotischer Fotoaustausch unter Jugendlichen: Verbreitung, Funktionen und Folgen des Sexting. Z Sexualforsch 25:4–25 · DOI
- Henry N, Powell A (2016) Technology-facilitated sexual violence: a literature rebiew of empirical research. Trauma Violence Abus 17:1–14
- Döring N (2014) Consensual sexting among adolescents: risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology 8:article 9 · DOI
- Klettke B, Hallford DJ, Mellor DJ (2014) Sexting prevalence and correlates: a systematic literature review. Clin Psychol Rev 34:44–53 · DOI
- Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (2015) JIM 2015. Jugend, Information, Multimedia. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19jähriger
- Schmidt G (Hrsg) (2000) Kinder der sexuellen Revolution. Kontinuität und Wandel studentischer Sexualität 1966–1996. Psychosozial-Verlag, Gießen
- Clement U (1986) Sexualität im sozialen Wandel. Eine empirische Vergleichsstudie an Studenten 1966 und 1981. Enke, Stuttgart
- Giese H, Schmidt G (1968) Studentensexualität. Verhalten und Einstellungen. Eine Umfrage an 12 westdeutschen Universitäten. Rowohlt, Hamburg
- Dekker A, Matthiesen S (2015) Studentische Sexualität im Wandel: 1966 – 1981 – 1996 – 2012. Z Sexualforsch 28:245–271 · DOI
- Strassberg DS, McKinnon RK, Sustaíta MA, Rullo J (2013) Sexting by high school students: an exploratory and descriptive study. Arch Sex Behav 42:15–21 · DOI
- Fein H (2011) Judging victims: why we stigmatize survivors, and how they reclaim respect. Contemp Sociol 40:27–28 · DOI
- Döring N (2015) Sexting. Aktueller Forschungsstand und Schlussfolgerungen für die Praxis. In: Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Kinder- und Jugendschutz (Hrsg) Gewalt Im Netz. Sexting, Cybermobbing & Co. BAJ, Berlin
- Poelchau H‑W, Briken P, Wazlawik M, Bauer U, Fegert JM, Kavemann B (2015) Bonner Ethik-Erklärung. Empfehlungen für die Forschung zu sexueller Gewalt in pädagogischen Kontexten. Z Sexualforsch 28:153–160 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review
Henry, N., & Beard, G. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241266137 · Cited by 63
“Fourth, the review only included studies in English.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Dekker, A., & Koops, T.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Dekker, Arne
- Venue
- Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
- Published
- 2017-07-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1034-1039
- ISSN
- 0007-5914 (ISSN-L)
- 1436-9990
- 1437-1588
- OpenAlex
- W2738428466
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Keywords
- sexting, erotic images, non-consensual image sharing, sexual boundary violations, online sexual violence, young adults, romantic relationships, student population, Germany
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Erotica, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Photography, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses, Students, Crime Victims, Presumed Consent, Young Adult, Text Messaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexting als Risiko?: Zum konsensuellen und nichtkonsensuellen Versand persönlicher erotischer Fotos mittels digitaler Medien. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00103-017-2595-9
- The paper
- Dekker, A., & Koops, T. (2017). Sexting als Risiko?: Zum konsensuellen und nichtkonsensuellen Versand persönlicher erotischer Fotos mittels digitaler Medien. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-017-2595-9