CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesPectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment

Diagnostik und Therapie der nichtsyndromalen und syndromalen Kraniosynostosen

Cedzich, C., Farmand, M.·2003·HNO
DOI 10.1007/s00106-002-0799-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Premature craniosynostosis is caused by a premature closure of single or multiple sutures of the cranial vault. It may result not only in aesthetic but also in functional disorders with an occasional ICP increase leading to a dramatic loss of vision. In the 1970s,Paul Tessier published his craniofacial principles for the primary treatment of craniosynostosis. His approach has gained wide acceptance over the previously described craniectomies and bone flaps, especially because of the significant benefits with an acceptably low level of morbidity. The following paper reviews the different kinds of craniosynostoses, their specific clinical manifestations, the necessary diagnostic examinations and the specific surgical procedures and operative results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00106-002-0799-1

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2003, Cedzich and Farmand recommended confirming suspected craniosynostosis with posterior-anterior and lateral skull X-ray and CT, with SPECT scintigraphy to assess suture occlusion and sonography only for follow-up.

    “In 2003, Cedzich and Farmand published the status of the necessary diagnosis of craniosynostosis. Accordingly, an existing suspected diagnosis should be confirmed at that time by a posterior-anterior and a lateral conventional X-Ray of the skull and a more detailed image should also be obtained by computed tomography (CT).”

    From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Cedzich, C., & Farmand, M.
Affiliations
Nuremberg Hospital (DE)
Venue
HNO
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
198-208
ISSN
  • 0017-6192 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-0458
DOI
10.1007/s00106-002-0799-1
OpenAlex
W2031670666
Cited by
6
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • HNO (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
craniosynostosis, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, syndromic craniosynostosis, premature suture closure, cranial vault, craniosynostosis surgery, craniectomy, bone flap, intracranial pressure, vision loss, diagnostic workup, clinical features
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Diagnostic Imaging, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Counseling, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Intracranial Pressure, Male, Syndrome, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review