Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize

Open access
Albrecht, Theresa, Wimmer, Valentin, Auinger, Hans-Jürgen, Erbe, Malena, Knaak, Carsten, Ouzunova, Milena, Simianer, Henner, Schön, Chris-Carolin·2011·Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Abstract

This is the first large-scale experimental study on genome-based prediction of testcross values in an advanced cycle breeding population of maize. The study comprised testcross progenies of 1,380 doubled haploid lines of maize derived from 36 crosses and phenotyped for grain yield and grain dry matter content in seven locations. The lines were genotyped with 1,152 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Pedigree data were available for three generations. We used best linear unbiased prediction and stratified cross-validation to evaluate the performance of prediction models differing in the modeling of relatedness between inbred lines and in the calculation of genome-based coefficients of similarity. The choice of similarity coefficient did not affect prediction accuracies. Models including genomic information yielded significantly higher prediction accuracies than the model based on pedigree information alone. Average prediction accuracies based on genomic data were high even for a complex trait like grain yield (0.72–0.74) when the cross-validation scheme allowed for a high degree of relatedness between the estimation and the test set. When predictions were performed across distantly related families, prediction accuracies decreased significantly (0.47–0.48). Prediction accuracies decreased with decreasing sample size but were still high when the population size was halved (0.67–0.69). The results from this study are encouraging with respect to genome-based prediction of the genetic value of untested lines in advanced cycle breeding populations and the implementation of genomic selection in the breeding process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00122-011-1587-7

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Foulkes AS (2009) Applied statistical genetics with R: for population-based association studies, 1st edn. Springer, New York · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-89554-3
  2. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd. Hemel Hempstead
  3. Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD, Bowman P, Moser G, Tier B, Crump R, Khatkar M, Raadsma HW, Goddard ME (2009a) Accuracy of genomic selection: comparing theory and results. Proc Assoc Adv Anim Breed Genet 18:34–37
  4. Luan T, Wooliams JA, Lien S, Kent M, Svendsen M, Meuwissen THE (2009) The accuracy of genomic selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation. Genetics 183:1119–1126 · doi:10.1534/genetics.109.107391
  5. Melchinger AE, Messmer MM, Lee M, Woodman WL, Lamkey KR (1991) Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci 31:669–678 · doi:10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183x003100030025x

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Albrecht, T., Wimmer, V., Auinger, H.-J., Erbe, M., Knaak, C., Ouzunova, M., Simianer, H., & Schön, C.-C.
Venue
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Published
2011-04-20
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
339-350
ISSN
  • 0040-5752 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2242
OpenAlex
W2030718898
Cited by
288
References
42
FWCI
13.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00122-011-1587-7
The paper
Albrecht, T., Wimmer, V., Auinger, H.-J., Erbe, M., Knaak, C., Ouzunova, M., Simianer, H., & Schön, C.-C. (2011). Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1587-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.