Long-term mortality in a nationwide cohort of childhood-onset type 1 diabetic patients in Norway
Open accessAbstract
Aims/hypothesis We examined long-term total and cause-specific mortality in a nationwide, population-based Norwegian cohort of patients with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes.Materials and methods All Norwegian type 1 diabetic patients who were diagnosed between 1973 and 1982 and were under 15 years of age at diagnosis were included (n=1,906). Mortality was recorded from diabetes onset until 31 December 2002 and represented 46,147 person-years. The greatest age attained among deceased subjects was 40 years and the maximum diabetes duration was 30 years. Cause of death was ascertained by reviews of death certificates, autopsy protocols and medical records. The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was based on national background statistics.Results During follow-up 103 individuals died. The mortality rate was 2.2/1000 person-years. The overall SMR was 4.0 (95% CI 3.2-4.8) and was similar for males and females. For ischaemic heart disease the SMR was 20.2 (7.3-39.8) for men and 20.6 (1.8-54.1) for women. Acute metabolic complications of diabetes were the most common cause of death under 30 years of age (32%). Cardiovascular disease was responsible for the largest proportion of deaths from the age of 30 years onwards (30%). Violent death accounted for 28% of the deaths in the total cohort (35% among men and 11% among women).Conclusions/interpretation Childhood-onset type 1 diabetes still carries an increased mortality risk when compared with the general population, particularly for cardiovascular disease. To reduce these deaths, attention should be directed to the prevention of acute metabolic complications, the identification of psychiatric vulnerability and the early detection and treatment of cardiovascular disease and associated risk factors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hypoglycaemic events are associated with 4-10% of type 1 diabetes-related deaths.
“and are associated with 4–10% of type 1 diabetes-related deaths.110–112”
From Type 1 diabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [112]
The clinical-review results report 11 deaths classified as due to hypoglycaemia among 103 deaths—about 11%—in a Norwegian cohort with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes. This supports an association with deaths, but the paper does not establish the stated 4–10% range for type 1 diabetes-related deaths generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHypertension and dyslipidemia are important vascular disease risk factors, with extensive data supporting their role as targets to improve cardiovascular health in people with type 1 diabetes.
“In addition to glycemic control, hypertension and dyslipidemia are also important vascular disease risk factors with extensive data to support their role as targets to improve cardiovascular health in people with T1D 120.”
From Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [120]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 390
- Authors
- Skrivarhaug, T., Bangstad, H.-J., Stene, L. C., Sandvik, L., Hanssen, K. F., & Joner, G.
- Affiliations
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Skrivarhaug, T.
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2005-12-20
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-305
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W1990788081
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Diabetesforbundet
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, childhood-onset diabetes, long-term mortality, cause-specific mortality, ischemic heart disease, cardiovascular disease, violent death, standardized mortality ratio, sex differences, psychiatric vulnerability, cardiovascular risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cause of Death, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Norway, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Myocardial Ischemia, Age of Onset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review