Cited by 71Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and Research

An empirical index of insulin sensitivity from short IVGTT: validation against the minimal model and glucose clamp indices in patients with different clinical characteristics

Open access
Tura, A., Sbrignadello, S., Succurro, E., Groop, L., Sesti, G., Pacini, G.·2010·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis Minimal model analysis for insulin sensitivity has been validated against the glucose clamp and is an accepted method for estimating insulin sensitivity from IVGTT. However minimal model analysis requires a 3 h test and relevant expertise to run the mathematical model. The aim of this study was to suggest a simple predictor of minimal model analysis index using only 1 h IVGTT.Methods We studied participants with different clinical characteristics who underwent 3 h regular (n = 336) or insulin-modified (n = 160) IVGTT, or 1 h IVGTT and euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp (n = 247). Measures of insulin sensitivity were insulin sensitivity index estimated by minimal model analysis (S(I)) and the mean glucose infusion rate (clamp) (M). A calculated S(I) (CS(I)) predictor, CS(I) = Alpha X K(G)/(DeltaAUC(INS)/T), was suggested, based on the calculation of the rate of glucose disappearance K(G) and the suprabasal AUC of insulin concentration DeltaAUC(INS) over T = 40 min. For all the participants, alpha was assumed equal to the regression line slope between K(G)/(DeltaAUC(INS)/T) and S(I) in control participants.Results CS(I) and S(I) showed high correlation (R(2) = 0.68-0.96) and regression line slopes of approximately one in the majority of groups. CS(I) tended to overestimate S(I) in type 2 diabetic participants, but results were more reliable when CS(I) was computed with insulin-modified rather than regular IVGTT. CS(I) showed behaviours similar to S(I) as regards relationships with BMI, acute insulin response and sex. CS(I) showed good correlation with M (R(2) = 0.82).Conclusions/interpretation A short test can achieve a good approximation of minimal model analysis and clamp insulin sensitivity. The importance of a method such as CS(I) is that it allows analysis of IVGTT datasets with samples limited to 1 h.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-009-1547-9

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The insulin sensitivity index (CSI) from the 50-minute IVGTT is highly correlated with the Minimal Model insulin sensitivity index (SI) from a 3-hour IVGTT and with the glucose infusion rate during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, and has greater reproducibility than the Matsuda composite index (MISI) derived from an OGTT.

    “CSI is highly correlated with the Minimal Model insulin sensitivity index (SI) obtained from a 3-hour IVGTT, as well as the glucose infusion rate during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp [19]. This method has also been used to assess insulin sensitivity in response to acute exercise [20,21], and has greater reproducibility than the Matsuda composite index (MISI) derived from an OGTT [20].”

    From Twelve weeks of sprint interval training improves indices of cardiometabolic health similar to traditional endurance training despite a five-fold lower exercise volume and time commitment (2016) · cites this paper as [19]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tura, A., Sbrignadello, S., Succurro, E., Groop, L., Sesti, G., & Pacini, G.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Magna Graecia University (IT)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Pacini, G.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2009-10-30
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
144-152
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2153797852
Cited by
71
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Sanofi
  • Universität Wien
  • Medizinische Universität Wien
  • European Association for the Study of Diabetes
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
insulin sensitivity, insulin sensitivity index, minimal model analysis, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, glucose infusion rate, glucose disappearance rate, type 2 diabetes, acute insulin response, body mass index, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperinsulinism, Hyperparathyroidism, Insulin, Kidney Diseases, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Regression Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Glucose Clamp Technique, Body Mass Index, Glucose Intolerance, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review