Cited by 22Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementGDF15 and Related BiomarkersCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

Prognostic value of plasma MR-proADM vs NT-proBNP for heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes: the SURDIAGENE prospective study

Open access
for the SURDIAGENE Study Group, Fraty, Mathilde, Velho, Gilberto, Gand, Elise, Fumeron, Fréderic, Ragot, Stéphanie, Sosner, Philippe, Mohammedi, Kamel +9 more·2018·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is the gold standard prognostic biomarker for diagnosis and occurrence of heart failure. Here, we compared its prognostic value for the occurrence of congestive heart failure with that of plasma mid-region pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), a surrogate for adrenomedullin, a vasoactive peptide with vasodilator and natriuretic properties, in people with type 2 diabetes.Methods Plasma MR-proADM concentration was measured in baseline samples of a hospital-based cohort of consecutively recruited participants with type 2 diabetes. Our primary endpoint was heart failure requiring hospitalisation.Results We included 1438 participants (age 65 ± 11 years; 604 women and 834 men). Hospitalisation for heart failure occurred during follow-up (median 64 months) in 206 participants; the incidence rate of heart failure was 2.5 (95% CI 2.2, 2.9) per 100 person-years. Plasma concentrations of MR-proADM and NT-proBNP were significantly associated with heart failure in a Cox multivariable analysis model when adjusted for age, diabetes duration, history of coronary heart disease, proteinuria and baseline eGFR (adj HR [95%CI] 1.83 [1.51, 2.21] and 2.20 [1.86, 2.61], respectively, per 1 SD log 10 increment, both p < 0.001). MR-proADM contributed significant supplementary information to the prognosis of heart failure when we considered the clinical risk factors (integrated discrimination improvement [IDI, mean ± SEM] 0.021 ± 0.007, p = 0.001) (Table 3). Inclusion of NT-proBNP in the multivariable model including MR-proADM contributed significant complementary information on prediction of heart failure (IDI [mean ± SEM] 0.028 ± 0.008, p < 0.001). By contrast, MR-proADM did not contribute supplementary information on prediction of heart failure in a model including NT-proBNP (IDI [mean ± SEM] 0.003 ± 0.003, p = 0.27), with similar results for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and preserved ejection fraction.Conclusions/interpretation MR-proADM is a prognostic biomarker for heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes but gives no significant complementary information on prediction of heart failure compared with NT-proBNP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-018-4727-7

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • External validation used adjudication data from the SURDIAGENE cohort, comprising 88 hospital reports (28 positive controls and 60 negative controls).

    “For external validation, we used adjudication data from the SUR­ DIAGENE cohort, comprising a total of 88 hospital reports, with 28 as positive controls and 60 as negative controls [19,20].”

    From Assessing large language models for acute heart failure classification and information extraction from French clinical notes (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods and Outcome sections identify the SURDIAGENE cohort and say that hospitalisation endpoints were adjudicated. They do not describe the citing study’s external validation or substantiate its sample of 88 hospital reports, including 28 positive and 60 negative controls (searched those numbers and terms). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
for the SURDIAGENE Study Group, Fraty, M., Velho, G., Gand, E., Fumeron, F., Ragot, S., Sosner, P., Mohammedi, K., Gellen, B., Saulnier, P.-J., Halimi, J.-M., Montaigne, D., Ducrocq, G., Rehman, M., Marre, M., Roussel, R., & Hadjadj, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Fraty, Mathilde
  • Hadjadj, Samy
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2018-09-19
Volume
61
Issue
12
Pages
2643-2653
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2891162798
Cited by
22
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, NT-proBNP, heart failure, type 2 diabetes, prognostic factors, heart failure hospitalization, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, adrenomedullin, natriuretic peptides, integrated discrimination improvement, cardiovascular risk prediction, diabetes duration, proteinuria, EGFR
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropeptides, Peptide Fragments, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Adrenomedullin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review