Cited by 219Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Assessment of depression prevalence in rural Uganda using symptom and function criteria

Bolton, Paul, Wilk, ChristopherM., Ndogoni, Lincoln·2004·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background We sought to assess the prevalence of major depression in a region of sub-Saharan Africa severely affected by HIV, using symptom and functional criteria as measured with locally validated instruments. Method Six hundred homes in the Masaka and Rakai districts of southwest Uganda were selected by weighted systematic random sampling. A locally validated version of the depression section of the Hopkins Symptom Check List (DHSCL) and a community-generated index of functional impairment were used to interview 587 respondents. Results Of respondents, 21% were diagnosed with depression using three of the five DSM-IV criteria (including function impairment) compared with 24.4% using symptom criteria alone. Increased age and lower educational levels are associated with a greater risk for depression; however, a gender effect was not detected. Conclusions Most community-based assessments of depression in sub-Saharan Africa based on the DSM-IV have used symptom criteria only. We found that expanding criteria to more closely match the complete DSM-IV is feasible, thereby making more accurate assessments of prevalence possible. This approach suggests that major depression and associated functional impairment are a substantial problem in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-004-0763-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpersonal psychotherapy in a group format was selected specifically because it was considered the most culturally appropriate intervention for this population, based on results of previous qualitative research and on discussions with representatives of the local population.

    “Interpersonal psychotherapy in a group format was selected specifically because it was considered the most culturally appropriate intervention for this population, based on results of our previous qualitative research (Bolton et al , 2004) and on discussions with representatives of the local population.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolton, P., Wilk, C., & Ndogoni, L.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • World Vision International (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilk, ChristopherM.
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2004-06
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
442-7
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W1990149441
Cited by
219
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, depression prevalence, rural Uganda, HIV, functional disability, symptom criteria, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, Hopkins Symptom Checklist, risk factors, age, educational attainment, gender differences
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Population, Uganda, Reproducibility of Results, HIV Infections, Comorbidity, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review