CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 419Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-harm in England: a tale of three cities: Multicentre study of self-harm

Hawton, Keith, Bergen, Helen, Casey, Deborah, Simkin, Sue, Palmer, Ben, Cooper, Jayne, Kapur, Nav, Horrocks, Judith, House, Allan, Lilley, Rachael, Noble, Rachael, Owens, David·2007·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
DOI 10.1007/s00127-007-0199-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Self-harm is a major healthcare problem in the United Kingdom, but monitoring of hospital presentations has largely been done separately in single centres. Multicentre monitoring of self-harm has been established as a result of the National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England.Method Data on self-harm presentations to general hospitals in Oxford (one hospital), Manchester (three hospitals) and Leeds (two hospitals), collected through monitoring systems in each centre, were analysed for the 18-month period March 2000 to August 2001.Results The findings were based on 7344 persons who presented following 10,498 episodes of self-harm. Gender and age patterns were similar in the three centres, 57.0% of patients being female and two-thirds (62.9%) under 35 years of age. The largest numbers by age groups were 15-19 year-old females and 20-24 year-old males. The female to male ratio decreased with age. Rates of self-harm were higher in Manchester than Oxford or Leeds, in keeping with local suicide rates. The proportion of patients receiving a specialist psychosocial assessment varied between centres and was strongly associated with admission to the general hospital. Approximately 80% of self-harm involved self-poisoning. Overdoses of paracetamol, the most frequent method, were more common in younger age groups, antidepressants in middle age groups, and benzodiazepines and sedatives in older age groups. Alcohol was involved in more than half (54.9%) of assessed episodes. The most common time of presentation to hospital was between 10 pm and 2 am.Conclusions Multicentre monitoring of self-harm in England has demonstrated similar overall patterns of self-harm in Oxford, Manchester and Leeds, with some differences reflecting local suicide rates. Diurnal variation in time of presentation to hospital and the need for assessment of non-admitted patients have implications for service provision.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-007-0199-7

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Clinical guideline 16. Self-harm: the short-term physical and psychological management and secondary prevention of self-harm in primary and secondary care. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
  2. Royal College of Psychiatrists (2004) Assessment following self-harm in adults CR122. Royal College of Psychiatrists, London
  3. Statacorp (2003) Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0. Stata Corporation, College Station
  4. Statacorp (2003) Stata survey data reference manual release 8.0. Stata Corporation, College Station

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 419

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hawton, K., Bergen, H., Casey, D., Simkin, S., Palmer, B., Cooper, J., Kapur, N., Horrocks, J., House, A., Lilley, R., Noble, R., & Owens, D.
Affiliations
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Hawton, Keith
ORCID
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-05-21
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
513-521
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
DOI
10.1007/s00127-007-0199-7
OpenAlex
W1512725483
Cited by
419
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 20
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
self-harm, hospital presentations, self-poisoning, acetaminophen overdose, antidepressant overdose, benzodiazepine overdose, alcohol involvement, diurnal variation, psychosocial assessment, suicide rates, Oxford, Manchester, LEED
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Antidepressive Agents, Data Collection, Emergency Service, Hospital, England, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Time, Self-Injurious Behavior, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review