Cited by 393Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Suicide following self-harm: Findings from the Multicentre Study of self-harm in England, 2000–2012

Hawton, Keith, Bergen, Helen, Cooper, Jayne, Turnbull, Pauline, Waters, Keith, Ness, Jennifer, Kapur, Nav·2015·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Self-harm is a key risk factor for suicide and it is important to have contemporary information on the extent of risk.Methods Mortality follow-up to 2012 of 40,346 self-harm patients identified in the three centres of the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England between 2000 and 2010.Results Nineteen per cent of deaths during the study period (N=2704) were by suicide, which occurred in 1.6% of patients (2.6% of males and 0.9% of females), during which time the risk was 49 times greater than the general population risk. Overall, 0.5% of individuals died by suicide in the first year, including 0.82% of males and 0.27% of females. While the absolute risk of suicide was greater in males, the risk relative to that in the general population was higher in females. Risk of suicide increased with age. While self-poisoning had been the most frequent method of self-harm, hanging was the most common method of subsequent suicide, particularly in males. The number of suicides was probably a considerable underestimate as there were also a large number of deaths recorded as accidents, the majority of which were poisonings, these often involving psychotropic drugs.Limitations The study was focussed entirely on hospital-presenting self-harm.Conclusions The findings underline the importance of prevention initiatives focused on the self-harm population, especially during the initial months following an episode of self-harm. Estimates using suicide and open verdicts may underestimate the true risk of suicide following self-harm; inclusion of accidental poisonings may be warranted in future risk estimates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.062

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawton, K., Bergen, H., Cooper, J., Turnbull, P., Waters, K., Ness, J., & Kapur, N.
Affiliations
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Royal Derby Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hawton, Keith
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
175
Pages
147-151
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000008630
Cited by
393
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6
FWCI
28.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
self-harm, suicide, suicide risk, self-poisoning, hanging, accidental poisoning, psychotropic drugs, suicide prevention, mortality follow-up
MeSH terms
Accidents, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Poisoning, Risk, Risk Factors, Suicide, Self-Injurious Behavior, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review