Cited by 42Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMental Health and Patient InvolvementSchizophrenia research and treatment

Training patients with schizophrenia to share decisions with their psychiatrists: a randomized-controlled trial

Hamann, Johannes, Parchmann, Anna, Sassenberg, Nina, Bronner, Katharina, Albus, Margot, Richter, Alwin, Hoppstock, Sandra, Kissling, Werner·2017·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose Many patients with schizophrenia have a desire for shared decision-making (SDM). However, in clinical practice SDM often does not take place. One cause might be that many patients behave passively in the medical encounter, therefore not facilitating SDM. It was the aim of the study to evaluate the effects of a patient directed SDM-training on patients' communicative behavior in the consultation, their attitudes towards decision-making and their long-term adherence.Methods Randomized-controlled trial comparing a five-session SDM-training for inpatients with schizophrenia with five sessions of non-specific group training. The SDM-training sessions included motivational (e.g. prospects of participation, patient rights) and behavioral aspects (e.g. role plays) and addressed important aspects of the patient-doctor interaction such as question asking or giving feedback.Results N = 264 patients were recruited in four psychiatric hospitals in Germany. The SDM-training yielded no group differences regarding the main outcome measure (treatment adherence) at 6 and 12 months after discharge. However, there were short-term effects on patients' participation preferences, their wish to take over more responsibility for medical decisions and (according to their psychiatrists' estimate) their behavior in psychiatric consultations.Conclusions While there was no effect regarding treatment adherence, the shared decision-making training for inpatients with schizophrenia has been shown to increase patients' active behavior in psychiatric consultations during their inpatient treatment. When implemented it should be combined with complementary SDM interventions (decision support tools and communication training for professionals) to yield maximum effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-016-1327-z

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamann, J., Parchmann, A., Sassenberg, N., Bronner, K., Albus, M., Richter, A., Hoppstock, S., & Kissling, W.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost (DE)
Corresponding author
Hamann, Johannes
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2016-12-31
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
175-182
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2562265673
Cited by
42
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GX1032)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
schizophrenia, shared decision-making, patient training, patient participation, medication adherence, patient-doctor communication, psychiatric consultation, inpatient care, role play
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Decision Making, Female, Germany, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Schizophrenia, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review