The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental health impact of social capital interventions: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Purpose Mental disorders are a major contributor to the global burden of disease and disability, and can be extremely costly at both individual and community level. Social capital, (SC) defined as an individual's social relationships and participation in community networks, may lower the risk of mental disorders while increasing resilience capacity, adaptation and recovery. SC interventions may be a cost-effective way of preventing and ameliorating these conditions. However, the impact of these SC interventions on mental health still needs research.Methods We conducted a systematic review of SC-based interventions to investigate their effect on mental health outcomes from controlled, quasi-experimental studies or pilot trials. We searched twelve academic databases, three clinical trials registries, hand-searched references and contacted field experts. Studies' quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools for randomized and non-randomized studies.Results Seven studies were included in the review, published between 2006 and 2016. There was substantial heterogeneity in the definitions of both SC and mental disorders among the studies, preventing us from calculating pooled effect sizes. The interventions included community engagement and educative programs, cognitive processing therapy and sociotherapy for trauma survivors, and neighbourhood projects.Conclusions There are paucity of SC interventions investigating the effect on mental health outcomes. This study showed that both SC scores and mental health outcomes improved over time but there was little evidence of benefit compared to control groups in the long term. Further high-quality trials are needed, especially among adverse populations to assess sustainability of effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Supporting this suggestion, recent reviews have shown that loneliness interventions informed by a social identity approach are particularly promising (Flores et al., 2018;Steffens et al., 2021).”
From Acceptability and Feasibility of an Intervention to Enhance Social Group Belonging: Evidence From Three Trials of Groups 4 Health (2022) · cites this paper as Flores et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Vos, T., Abajobir, A. A., Abate, K. H., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., Abd-Allah, F., Abdulkader, R. S., Abdulle, A. M., Abebo, T. A., Abera, S. F., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32154-2 · Cited by 13,220
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM)
Leong, F. T. L. (2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412963978.n182 · Cited by 10,861
Vos, T., Barber, R. M., Bell, B., Bertozzi-Villa, A., Biryukov, S., Bolliger, I., Charlson, F., Davis, A., Degenhardt, L., Dicker, D., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60692-4 · Cited by 6,414
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
Kawachi, I. I. (2001) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jurban/78.3.458 · Cited by 3,565
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social capital and health: A systematic review of systematic reviews
Ehsan, A., Klaas, H. S., Bastianen, A., & Spini, D. (2019) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100425 · Cited by 468
Evidence suggests a need to rethink social capital and social capital interventions
Shiell, A., Hawe, P., & Kavanagh, S. (2018) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.006 · Cited by 145
Breedvelt, J., Tiemeier, H. W., Sharples, E., Galea, S., Niedzwiedz, C. L., Elliott, I., & Bockting, C. (2022) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2022.57 · Cited by 104
A Brain Capital Grand Strategy: toward economic reimagination
Smith, E., Ali, D. A., Wilkerson, B., Dawson, W. D., Sobowale, K., Reynolds, C. F., Berk, M., Lavretsky, H., Jeste, D. V., Ng, C. H., et al. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-00918-w · Cited by 85
Fox, S. D., Griffin, R. H., & Pachankis, J. E. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112727 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Flores, E. C., Fuhr, D. C., Bayer, A. M., Lescano, A. G., Thorogood, N., & Simms, V.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Flores, Elaine C.
- Venue
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Published
- 2017-12-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-119
- ISSN
- 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-9285
- PMC
- PMC6040224
- OpenAlex
- W2772635566
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Fogarty International Center (US) (2D43 TW007393-06)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- social capital, mental health interventions, mental illness, community participation, cognitive processing therapy, trauma survivors, sociotherapy, resilience, social networks, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cost of Illness, Young Adult, Social Participation, Social Capital
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
